Evidence Case Studies Samples For Students

Policy and procedure directives are meant to ensure that all actions taken in every institution of the criminal justice system abides not only to the federal constitution, but also to ethics and human rights. Therefore, when policies and procedures are being drafted, their main foundation is the constitution. However, as history has shown, things are not always direct in the criminal justice system. An action taken in criminal justice system such a jail and that seemingly abides by the constitution may later be interpreted as an infringement on the constitutional right of the defendant. Such is the case of Carter ...

Integrity

Integrity

This is an ethical, legal and integrity question that needs to be interrogated in the best way possible. To start with, the name-calling in the workplace is uncalled for. It not only demoralizes the person who is being called the name, but it also creates a tense atmosphere since workmates are not respectful to one another. The officer in question is being referred to as “a rat” just because he testified against a person who committed a criminal offence. It was good of him to testify and ensure that justice was met because the hallmark of criminal law is to ensure ...

1. Foundationalism is a mode of justification which is primarily based on a system of beliefs. These beliefs are critically analyzed and they either gain merit or lose justification based on the emergent findings of their critical and exhaustive analysis and interpretation. Foundationalism further asserts that there are some self-justifying statements that do not need any further justification. There exists some statements which are self-evident. These statements are in themselves considered irrefutable truths and do not need any form of justification. Coherentism argues that a statement gains justification only upon discovery of other statements that lend support to the argument statement. Every ...

It was in a nice afternoon that I had sat in a restaurant with a colleague after work. He is a man who is usually conservative and I could not predict what was up for discussion. However, being the two of us in a shade, I believed this day we would share a lot with the man.

Following the conservative nature of the friend, I was mindful of what he was about to share with me. It was not a guarantee that he had something in particular that he wanted us to share since I still doubted how he could open up to me. At several ...

This is a case of Juli and Steve and their positions on the issue whether the release or publication of certain works of art, which in their case was the Laramie Project should be regulated in an event that not doing so creates the possibility of igniting public unrest or compromising the community of individuals who are not involved in the dispute. In the case, Steve argues that the public release of the Laramie Project should be cancelled and be ultimately banned from the campus. Juli, on the other hand argues that there is nothing wrong with publicly releasing or ...

Introduction

A criminal justice process is normally followed to ensure an individual’s rights are not abused. According to Moak and Carlson (3), the criminal justice process aims to ensure that relevant fact-finding is conducted in an effort to establish the truth. The criminal justice procedure needs to be done in accordance or by not being in contrary to an individual’s right as stipulated in the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteen amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Moak and Carlson (4) note that a criminal justice process needs to involve intensive cross-examination of both prosecution witness (the arresting officer and ...

The problem has two sides. The point is that some argue that when a police officer enters a dwelling to conduct a search, the owner of a dwelling may ask to leave. Minnesota vs. Olsen is one of such cases. United States vs. Beck is another case when police officers conducted illegal search. Although, police officers managed to conduct a search, in the court it was proved that the search was illegal. On the contrary, there is a case Kentucky vs. King. Police officers tried to buy drugs from Mr. King. When they managed to do this, they followed the suspect and arrested him in ...

Elements of the crime

Orr was arrested over an arson charge at a place called Atascadero. In order for the prosecution to prove that he was the person responsible for the crime, the following elements were identified. In this case, the prosecution provided both the Actus Reus and the Mens Rea element in their bid to charge Mr. Orr for the offense. On the Actus Reus section, the following factors were associated with the arson that Mr. Orr was under accusation. The factors included the physical manifestations that placed him on a probability scale of being the mastermind in setting the place ablaze.

Actus Reus

The prosecution ...

1. Facts
2. Issue

The issues in the following case are:

Whether the search conducted by the police officers violated a provision of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution regarding a protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Did Mr. Blake had a reasonable expectation of privacy when he was residing at Mr. Smith`s household?

Could the evidence (drugs and guns) be considered admissible in a court of law?

3. Rule
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides protection against unlawful search and seizure of persons and their property. The provisions of the amendment clearly state that search and seizure shall be conducted with the presence of a warrant that particularly describes the places and/or things that ...

Missouri vs. Seibert

The petitioner was a woman named Seibert. She was charged and convicted of second-degree murder for her alleged involvement in the death of a 17-year-old handicapped boy. Seibert son who had died earlier and to conceal evidence of parental negligence, she colluded with her other son to set her house of fire. She realized that if only her son’s body was found in the charred house, this would also suggest neglectful parenting and so, a decision was made to leave the 17 years old boy in the house too. The police became suspicious of her involvement and picked her up to ...

Brief of Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Decided
Decided June 19, 1961
Character of Action
The case of Dollree Mapp v. State of Ohio (henceforth Mapp v. Ohio) was brought before the Supreme Court of the United States in March of 1961. The case was brought before the Supreme Court after an incident with local law enforcement and a search of Mapp’s home. The defendant was initially convicted in the Cuyahoga County Ohio Court of Common Pleas. The conviction was later affirmed by the Ohio Court of Appeals, and after the affirmation by the Court of Appeals ...

The first episode of the serial podcast explores the story of the murder of Hae Min Lee. The episode is about of Adnan Syed, an ex-boyfriend of Lee, convicted wrongfully for her murder. The clip links the different leads that aim to identify the legality of the conviction of Adnan for the murder of his ex-girlfriend. In this case, the episode explores the long dominant leads used in the conviction of Adnan and unravels some of the key issues that necessitate deliberation. It is evident as one listens to the episode that it attempts to unravel the alibis presented ...

The case clearly shows that there has been theft by Cathy who is an employee in the department. Because the amount is missing and there is a proof of tax receipt, the amount has been misappropriated by Cathy. Studying the scenario it can be concluded that the finance department has been suffering from such thefts since a long time. Cathy has been allotted the finance department which shows lack of internal control and segregation of duties. Only when she was away from work, such information about theft was discovered. The amount would be difficult to estimate.
Embezzlement could be occurring ...

Abstract

This case study will examine the challenges that the Porcini Inc Company is undergoing and conduct a study on the possible changes meant for implementation to meet the competition that is being brought forth by the rival fast food restaurants. This paper will also identify the changes that should be initiated to improve on the company’s growth through an increase in the number of sales which will be achieved through identifying the gaps that need to be filled in order to achieve the desired success. Recommendations will also be highlighted in relation to the changes that need to be ...

RE: EXPRESS OF NO MERIT ON THE CASE FILED BY SOFIA LUI’S FAMILY

Question Presented
The question I raise is that, was Uber system responsible for the death of Sofia Lui, and was the case filed by Sofia’s family has any merit?

Short answer

According to the arguments raised by the plaintiffs, Sofia Lui family represented by Attorney Christopher Dolan; there is no evidence linking Uber System to the death of Sofia Lui. The driver in contention was a contractor who had been given a job by Uber System but at the moment of the accident, the driver in mention did not have any account with the company. Mr. Muzaffar, the driver, was not ...

A chain of eleven random explosions has taken place in an area that traverses two states and seven counties. The random explosions resulted in five deaths, 32 injuries and significant property damage. In all eleven cases, the explosions were detonated remotely. The Virtual Police Department of Maryland (VDP) will be the lead investigative agency because the first three attacks were within its jurisdiction. Two suspects were recognized and arrested, one adult male and the other a teenage male. Search and seizures were exercised, and both subjects confessed to their respective roles in the collective crime.
- Model: Investigative Taskforce
...

I will rely on 22-2403 regarding second-degree murder
I will also rely on the evidence presented by an expert in Battered woman syndrome, Mrs. Dominique Stephens and a doctor, Sidney, who works at the emergency services. Mrs. Dominique’s evidence will show that she has been suffering from battered woman syndrome. The expert witness in battered woman syndrome will corroborate Dominique’s evidence and proof that she was suffering from the syndrome at the time when she shot her husband. The expert studied the defendant for one month and affirmed that she is suffering from battered woman syndrome. His ...

How to Inventory Office Supplies

It is evident that the development of technology has influenced a number of issues among new workers. It is evident that most of the new employees within organizations do not know how to use gears because they lack skills. Cindy, my organization’s deputy president, has requested me to train wo of my fellow employees on office supplies inventory maintenance at the workplace. I will ensure that they comprehend its importance This is a major way that the trainees will learn workplace skills and capabilities. I will ensure that the two trainees learn the basic skills of computer technology. This will ...

Forensic Evidence 1: Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999)Facts
Patrick Carmichael was driving his minivan on July 6, 1993 when its right rare tire burst was causing the van to turn over. As a result, one passenger died, and several others sustained injuries. Carmichael, enjoined by the survivors and the deceased’s representatives, instituted an action against the tire manufacturer and distributor. They claimed that the accident was caused by a fault in the tire. The claimant’s case by and large relied on the expert opinion of a tire failure analyst. According to the expert opinion, ...

As highlighted by the United States penal code, murder is classified as a crime. Whether it is in the first degree, second or third, it is still a crime that is punishable by law. In addition, armed robbery is a felony that is considered serious in nature because it poses a danger to the victims. In addition, murder can be classified into instigated murder under manslaughter. Criminal acts are acts that are against the law. The criminal act in question is a case that involved the murder of two store owners during a robbery incident in a Chicago store. The robbery was done by a man called ...

Peremptory challenge

In law, there is a provision for a peremptory challenge. Under this provision, attorneys have the discretion to select a jury or reject them even without stating the reasons as to why they do so. Presiding judges have the duty of deciding whether the peremptory challenge is accepted or not. In most cases, such challenges are as a result of a party to a case having a reason to think that engaging some jurors would result in an unfair verdict. When both parties to a case have an agreement as to the composition of the jury, there are high chances that they will accept the verdict. This ...

Section I. Circle the letter of the most appropriate answer.
1. In Griswold v. Connecticut the Supreme Court found that Connecticut’s statute, which banned contraceptives, violated a freedom expressly protected by which of the first ten amendments of the Constitution of the United States:
a. The First Amendment.
b. The Fifth Amendment.
c. The Fourth Amendment.
d. None of the above.
2. “Substantive due process” refers to those procedures:
a. that are expressly enumerated within the four corners of the United States Constitution.
b. that are not expressly enumerated by the ...

This research paper aims at establishing why heavy drinkers are more likely to think that their relationships are not happy as much as people who are light drinkers. This research will be evaluated on the basis on the role that income plays in contributing to the heavy drinking which may lead to unhappy marriages. The research will also evaluate who among men and women are more affected with heavy drinking which leads to unhappy marriages and relationships.
Having reviewed recent research conducted on the role alcohol plays in relationships, I established that alcohol has been a major influence in ...

Introduction

On the Mother’s Day of 2001, a murder incident occurred at a place called Antietam Creek. The body was found lying lifeless in the bushes of the creek. There was evidence to show that this was purely a murder incident because the manner in which the body of a young man was lying on the ground and also its condition was suggestive as such. At the bottom of a steep hill lay the body, with a pool of blood and evidence of some tussle on the ground. This showed that the young man must have struggled with his assailants before they succeeded in killing ...

Kenneth Ravenel v. Fredrick L. Burnett (Case study)
Kenneth Ravenel v. Fredrick L. Burnett (Case study)
Under the field of criminal law, the case, Kenneth RAVENEL v. Fredrick L. BURNETT [2070401], September 26, 2008, under the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, exemplifies conflict resolution. As an example, it entailed the requisite steps in which conflict may be resolved, in addition to the practicability of their applications. The case in point pertained to the claim by Burnett that Ravenel had threatened him with malicious harm, because of suspecting the former of being in an affair with his ...

Interview Techniques

Introduction
Law enforcement officers use interviews and interrogations to get information from criminal suspects. The two aspects of communication are important in deriving needed information. The two techniques are may be different in a number of ways. Interrogations are characterized by verbal aggressiveness while interviews engage a non-aggressive dialogue. Both the parties in an interview contribute to the conversation without prejudice. However, it seems that, in an interrogation, the verdict is already determined before the questioning begins. Sometimes officers engage in unorthodox tactics of eliciting information from suspects. Concerns have been raised about officers bullying suspects during interrogations. Interrogations may ...

The deceased, Carol Hoffman was murdered by her husband on the or about the evening of 10th or the early morning of 11th August 1981. They had earlier on spent the day together with their children and everything seemed fine. However, when they went to bed at night, David wanted to make love to his wife and when she refused, he choked her to death. After his wife’s death, David went to the basement of the house to call his mother (appellant) and asked her to go and sit in the living room. Sitting in the living room ...

The Defendant had been estranged from the complainant, who was his wife. The wife, Marjory Damms was also separated from her mother. The defendant wanted to reconcile his wife and her mother, hoping that it would lead to reconciliation between himself and Marjory. On the morning of 6th April, 1959 the defendant drove to where Marjory stayed, and waited at a bus stop he knew she frequented. When she arrived he lied to her that her mother was unwell, and convinced her to get into his car. When they arrived at the mother’s home, Marjory realized that the defendant ...

In the Canadian criminal justice system, bail suffices for purposes of releasing the accused while still on trial. The accused is afforded an opportunity out of detention at least until he is proven guilty, proof which has to be beyond reasonable doubts. It is in appreciation of the role of bail and the courts that confer the same thereof that I visited the said courts. On November 20th 2013 I visited a bail court as part of my class assignment to examine cases of accused being processed through a bail hearing. The bail court I visited was City Hall on Queen ...

Introduction

The ethical issue presented in this case is that the client is only concerned about the budget and project being delayed and is not concerned about the requirements of the room being explosion proof. Further, to solve this situation, Bull tells Dante that he will have the fire code official Bobby get back to him on the matter. Later, Bobby burns calls Dante and tells him that the room is explosion proof and they can continue with the work even without verifying that he has visited the site. Further, Dante is willing to accept the fire official statements and ...

Miranda v Arizona

The brief facts of the case were that the defendant Ernesto Miranda was arrested on the 13th of March 1963 by the police based on circumstantial evidence that tended to link him to the rape of an 18year old girl. Following an interrogation by police that lasted two hours, Miranda signed a confession statement to the rape charge on forms that alleged that he had made the confession without any coercion and out of his own free will. The form also stated that the defendant was well aware of his legal rights as well as the fact that any statements ...

Question 1

a). Using the ACF graph, a trend is identified, which shows seasonality. The first trough shows the high season whereas the second trough represents the slack. After the ninth period, the graph shifts to the negative side, which may signify a low season. The PACF graph shows that a majority of periods of high are followed by a low period. This, however, is different for some periods where a period of high is followed by two consequent lows. This is a non-linear trend for the Mobile Home Shipment.
b). From the autocorrelation analysis, there is an evident time series. A time series is when there is a ...

Miranda v. Arizona, Terry v. Ohio

Facts of the case
Ernest Miranda kidnapped and raped an 18-year old woman on her way back home from work after parting company with her coworker on alighting from a bus they had both travelled in. The victim could not identify the perpetrator even though police brought in several suspects. At one stage t police suspected her complaint itself. They made undergo lie-detector test but the test neither could confirm nor deny her innocence. However, after a week of the incident, the victim on her own found the victim and gave leads about him ...

Miranda v Arizona

The brief facts of the case were that the defendant Ernesto Miranda was arrested on the 13th of March 1963 by the police based on circumstantial evidence that linked him to the rape of an 18year old girl. Following an interrogation by police that lasted two hours, Miranda signed a confession statement to the rape charge on forms that alleged that he had made the confession without any coercion and out of his own free will. The form also stated that the defendant was well aware of his legal rights as well as the fact that any statements or confessions ...

Introduction

In this article, there is overwhelming evidence at the initial trial for any prosecutor, investigating authority and even the court to believe that John was the murderer. His confessions are consistent whenever they come, and his self-sentencing to death in itself an admission of guilt. The fact that even the state of the body turns out exactly where and how he had described to the police, and the motive he alleges would leave no doubt in anyone that he murdered Maxine in cold blood, and deserved the strictest sentence. Arrested seven months after the murder, crime scene evidence could ...

Factual Background

The Respondent in this matter, Abel and his friends were indicted with bank robbery in the District Court, with his cohorts pleading guilty to the charge as framed. The respondent however, denied the offence and the matter went for trial whereby one of the cohorts named Ehle agreed to testify against him. The respondent then made known to the court of his intention to discredit the testimony by Ehle by calling a witness named Mills who would testify to the effect that Ehle had admitted to him that he intended to implicate the respondent so as to obtain favorable treatment ...

Encompassing the group detailed recorded findings and research on the probe about experiences of web users experience when using different Web browsers. Keeping in mind the aim of this probe delivered by means of Identifying and distinguishing peculiarities of certain Web Browsers, which in the long run will lead to a reduction of the user’s attitude and experiences when using certain web pages. Each of the three methods used came along with their fair share of challenges. Each group member had their own valid merits and demerits regarding the use of certain Web Browsers over others. This brought up ...

U.S. versus AOL
This was a case regarding fraudulent business operations between PurchasePro and AOL. It focused on the overstating revenues that were obtained from the sale of software licenses. Chief executive officers of PurchasePro were accused of several charges including wire-fraud. This means that the crime involved the use of a computer or an equivalent electronics medium. This attaches the computer system as a means to achievement of the offenders’ main goal. Other crimes related to this case and computer use included identity theft and cyber stalking. As such, this case necessitated the use of computer forensics in the determination ...

The landlord’s strongest position arises out of the Lease Agreement dated November 1, 2005, together with the Smoke Detector Agreement dated the same day (attached as Exhibits A & B, respectively), taken together with the tenant’s undisputed actions from the facts given.
1. Affidavits from both the electrician (later identified as Lech Triscian) and the landlord (attached as Exhibits C & D, respectively) which outlines what was observed when they entered the premises, specifically;
A. The occupants appeared to include the person who was in the premises when the landlord and the electrician entered, which would violate ...

This case study presents bosses who are difficult to deal with mainly because they always think of what is best for the company. In the process of doing so, they push each and every person to surpass their limits. It is quite tough for an employee to deal with a difficult boss. They are always unpredictable like the commodore, less rational and less understandable. This makes it difficult to deal with them especially since one minute they seem quite understanding and the next they minute they behave like monsters.
Both bosses’ posses the characteristics discussed above. From the case, ...

Facts

The case concerns the contractor and Patrick who is the owner over an alleged contract breach on the renovation of a house belonging to the owner. Under the contract, there was a clause stating that the contractor would have to pay a fixed and liquidated damages without proof of loss, a sum equal to 35% of the full contract price and also pay the cost incurred on the attorney and the court cost. The plaintiff sued the contractor for the return of his deposit ($5000) while the defendant counterclaimed for $36,102 and attorney fees. The trial court concluded that the owner had ...

In the year 2008, a young woman Casey Anthony was accused a first-degree murder of her two year old daughter Caylee .She was also charged with other offences which include; aggravated manslaughter, providing false information to the law enforcement and aggravated child abuse. Casey Anthony was accused of providing false information by pleading not guilty of the charges and that the baby was kidnapped by a baby sitter .The case drew a lot of media attention and this forced the judge to keep the location of the jury selection secret for a very long time. The charges against Anthony gained ground due to the ...

The Exclusionary Rule is one of the more important rules that is utilized in the American judicial system. The entire American judicial system is designed to protect the individual's rights from the government, and to limit the amount of power that the federal and state governments have over the citizenry. In criminal trials, the individual is considered innocent by the government until proven guilty; this is to protect the individual citizen against unfair or untrue allegations, and to ensure that all citizens receive a fair trial when they are accused of criminal activity.
The exclusionary rule or the exclusionary ...

Occupation: Criminal Mastermind

Age: Unknown
Marital Status: Divorced
Much of the Joker’s life remains a mystery. No evidence of his existence in the form of DNA records or fingerprints was available for the Police Department. He speaks of an abusive and alcoholic father and states his hatred of him. Ultimately, no reliable history can be made of the Joker due to constant shifting of his story. We are introduced to the Joker while he and a group of compatriots are robbing a bank. Systematically and calculatedly the accomplices were killed leaving only the Joker to make his escape with the bank money. ...

Age: 27

Introduction
Lady Gaga was born in March 1986 in New York and since she was young she has always displayed her talent in music .Since her high school years, she has always been a provocative and an extremely strange performer. During her high school years, Lady Gaga was frequently mocked and ridiculed because of her personality. In interviews, she has admitted that she was a freak and never fitted in with her peers especially because of her obsession with attention. She has been the kind of person with crazy actions that make her look like she is seeking attention. But ...

Before a claim is filed in court, there are considerations a party has to bear in mind. These are regarded as pre-action considerations. They assist in determining factors such as the type and validity of the claim, the right parties, and the costs vis-à-vis the award. Essentially, they assist a party in determining whether litigation is the best option and if so, how it will be conducted.
Candy Tang wants to sue Sid Ho for injuries sustained because of an accident that occurred due to Sid’s negligence. The injuries have prevented her from carrying on her work as a professional ...

Memorandum

RE:
Tamara laments that upon trying various diets and many pills in sought for reducing weight, all her efforts have been futile. She is still earning those extra pounds even though she is starving and the weight loss pills do not seem to work. According to her, she could give anything just to get a former weight back.

Background

Barbara Printup-a senior marketing director for Cambridge Sciences Pharmaceuticals (CSP) paid attention to various overweight people as they narrated their numerous struggles to offset overweight. Due to this, he has been appointed to be in charge of the launching of a new ...

Question 1

The elements of negligence include the duty of care which involves taking reasonable precaution to reduce harm. Breach of duty indicates that lack of reasonable precaution leads to the breach of the initial duty of care (Miller & Jentz, 2010). Factual causation involves proving that there has been negligence while the last element is the damages payable to the plaintiff.

Question 2

Causation indicates the coexistence of causes and effects of the activity which are required to be proved in a court of law. It is necessary to prove causation as it indicates the relation between of the activity being claimed and its ...

Environmental and Nutritional Requirements of Lactobacillus casei

Lactobacillus species have attracted considerable attention during the past few years due to the health benefits to the gastrointestinal tract when they are added as probiotics to food products such as yogurt and other fermented milk drinks (Broadbent, Larsen, Deibel, & Steele, 2010). In general, Lactobacillus species exhibit very complex nutritional and environmental requirements for optimal growth. Particularly, Lactobacillus casei is a rod shaped, aciduric (prefers acidic environments), facultative (capable of living in aerobic or anaerobic conditions) and mesophilic (temperature range between 15-40°C) lactic acid bacterium. These characteristics allow its isolation from different environments including fermented milk, meat or vegetable ...

Major Issues in the Stella Liebeck’s Case and in the Successive Incidents

The major issue in the cases presented against McDonald’s is that customers suffered bodily and psychological harm from consuming their foodstuffs. For instance, in Stella Liebeck’s case she accuses McDonald’s of “gross negligence”, and selling “unreasonably dangerous” coffee that was “defectively manufactured”. Stella stayed in hospital for eight days and spent three weeks recuperating after suffering third-degree burns from a coffee cup bought from McDonald’s. Through her lawyer, Reed Morgan, Stella wanted to be compensated $ 100,000 for medical expenses and McDonald’s fined triple that amount in punitive damages. As the case went on trial, ...

Kay V. Cessna Aircraft Company, 548 F.2d 1370(1977)

Julius Kay, the Plaintiff’s deceased husband, had been killed after his Cessna airplane crashed as he took-off. One of the engines had failed resulting to the crush.
The Plaintiff sued the manufacturer of the plane, the defendants, under the strict products liability doctrine. The defendant argued that the instructions were adequate and had the deceased followed them, the accident would not have occurred.
The jury found the defendant liable for the accident upon which they made a motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. The trial court granted the motion. ...

Question 1: Discuss the implications of co-conducting a project plan from the project and department managers’ points of view.

Beijing EAPS Consulting Inc. (BEC) is a consulting company specializing in the provision of psychological support to personnel of BECs customer companies. BEC began with six staff in 2001 and has grown to 20 staff in 6 short years. The company started with two co-founders managing the company from a single office, shared between them. At the start of the venture, a definite company structure with identified departments did not exist. At the time, employees were assigned projects based on skills and company schedules.
In 2006, Beijing EAPS Consulting started setting up new departments and contracting new employees. The company structure ...

Formulated question

Question: If adults with schizophrenia received atypical antipsychotic medication verses conventional neuroleptics, which one will result in lower incidence of violent behavior.

Description of the practice setting

My practice setting is a group therapist. The role of a group therapist extends beyond that of a family therapist to address complications facing several individuals with schizophrenia in the entire community. The aim of this practice is to ensure that the patients do not end up feeling alone with their complications. The treatment involves encouraging these patients to share their problems with others suffering from similar problems. This way, they eventually end up understanding that they are not the ...

Introduction

Moral culpability can be defined as the degree or level of wrongfulness based on moral standards rather than the formulated legal standards. In his book The Ethics of Belief, William Clifford tries to illustrate this concept by giving an analogy to a ship owner and his ship. In the analogy, the ship owner manages to convince himself that his ship is seaworthy and can be sent to sea. He does this without verification and the result is that the vessel sinks and many people lose their lives but he goes ahead to collect his insurance settlement.
The ship-owner can ...

Abstract

In seeking success, Ford Motor Company entrusts the services of Alan Mulally, as the CEO. Having worked for Boeing, Mulally appears ready for this task as he embarks on undertaking a thorough research at Ford immediately he arrives, in order to study and formulate the best strategy for the company. As Ford Company is geared towards success, Mulally’s style of leadership is analyzed, as well as his personality dimension elements. The methods Mulally introduces at Ford are evaluated for effectiveness, while seeking for evidence of evidence based management at Ford. Furthermore, Mulally’s elements of communication openness are analyzed.

...

It makes use of data mirroring. This is achieved by combining two physical drives and then striping data across them. In this arrangement, the first stripe is the original data while the second is the mirror data, which is a copy of the original data but is written in RAID –level 1. This level provides 100% data redundancy but have diminished data storage space.
Relative value of an asset is the likeability of an asset when compared to another one. One factor that needs to be put into consideration when determining this is the ease with which the asset ...

In the case of the State of Arizona v. Gant, the question being addressed before the court was whether or not, under the 4th Amendment, law enforcement officers need to have their safety threatened or a need to preserve evidence in order to search a vehicle without a warrant after the occupants have been arrested.
Arizona state police arrested Rodney Gant on an outstanding warrant for driving a motor vehicle with a suspended license. The officers handcuffed Gant and he was placed in their squad car. He was locked inside of the car. After Gant was secured, police searched his vehicle. They found a ...

THE PROCEDURE FOR BRINGING A CLAIM UNDER THE CONVENTION

Chapter III of the ICSID convention, regulations and rules covers conciliation (World Bank Group, 2006). Section 1 to 3 of this chapter specifies the process of conciliation from the request, formation of the conciliation commission and the eventual conciliatory proceedings. Section 6 deals with the recognition and enforcement of an award.

Conciliation

According to this chapter, MTP Petroleum shall lodge an official request in writing to the Secretary General of ICSID. The Secretary General shall copy the same letter to the other party to inform them of the impending process (Reed, Paulsson, Blackaby, 2010). The request shall include the issues ...

The procedure identified for evaluation in this discussion is shaving a patient for preoperative surgery

Preoperative shaving is described as removal of hair from the site in which an incision is to be made during a surgical procedure. A bath is usually taken first. The area is cleaned thoroughly after a bat

h, and then utilizing a hair removal device hair is taken from the skin. The mostly used device in the facility was a razor. If patients were allergic to this instrument then a shaving power/ cream was the alternative.

Determination of practice

In many institutions shaving a preoperative site prior to surgery is a routine nursing intervention. However, with emerging speculations regarding whether it is necessary the surgeon has ...

According to US-CERT (2008), computer forensics is a discipline that combines law and computer science elements to collect and analyze data from computer systems, wireless communications, networks as well as storage in a manner that that is court of law treats as admissible. Similarly, Rouse (2007) clarifies that it is the use of computer analysis and investigation to collect evidence appropriate for purposes of presentation in any court of law. Its main goal is to carry out planned investigations while at the same time maintaining a well documented chain of evidence to exactly establish what happened and who is accountable. In essence, ...