Intention Case Studies Samples For Students

Business Commerce Law

Distinguish between libel, slander, defamation, trade slander, and deceit, indicating in what situations each would apply and the significance of the distinction.
Libel, slander, defamation, trade slander and deceit are legal terms that are often interchanged by lay persons. While these words may seem related and almost similar, there are several ways in which they are different. Here is a discussion of what these different terms mean and situations to illustrate their meaning:
Defamation is a broad term used to refer to any published statement that is a false accusation and is detrimental to a particular person’s reputation. The plaintiff ...

Issues

This case concerns the analysis of the validity of the offer and its acceptance under the terms and rules of the contract law made in different forms by virtue of the advertisements in the newspaper.

Contractual relations are comprised out of two primary pillars as the offer and acceptance. In fact, the one party to the contractual relations should provide the other one with the offer. In case the second party accepts this offer this implies that these people have entered into the legal and binding relations. Given the merits of the case, one may see that Philip plays ...

Abstract

The God squad group, mainly made of boys in junior and senior years, uses the 9/11 attacks as a rallying point for combination of white supremacist, racist, anti-Semitic, ant-Islamic, anti-immigrant, ant-gay, nee-fascist dogma mixed with a good dose of anti-abortion and fundamentalist Christian diatribe. The group catches the attention of the administration when they show up at school all wearing their uniforms and distributes the first edition of their weekly "newsletter". The” newsletter” contains highly offensive diatribes on how it is the "the duty of all true Americans to fight against the forces trying to destroy our country". The ...

People v. Poplar 20 Mich. App. 132, 173 N.W.2d 732 (1970) was an appeal filed in the Michigan Appellate Court by Marathon Poplar seeking to set aside a conviction of lower court that had found him guilty of aiding and abetting the crime of breaking and entering and of assault with intent to commit murder. The facts of the case which gave rise to the appeal are as follows.
On December 3, 1964 in the early morning hours, two men, Clifford Lorrick and Alfred Williams broke into the Oak recreation park building. However, before they could steal anything from ...

The case study on Salt Lake City, the Olympics, and Bribery manifested a complex scenario, which demands a critical valuation. The case involved the perceived default by professional heads of the Salt Lake City Olympic Committee (SLCOC) and members from the International Olympic Committee (IOC), who have the full understanding of the ethical and legal stipulations of their work. The analysis of the case requires exclusive consideration of all facets ranging from the activities, circumstances that led to the occurrences, the individuals involved and the required rules as well as the regulations governing the corporates. Therefore, the analysis would employ the ...

Abstract

The Crown and Waikato Tainui has been having conflicting standards in the management of the Waikato River. The report is basically giving details on the background of the different stands that each team has pertaining the river and how the conflict resolution was approached.
Tainui believes that the river lies in their ancestral land and that the Crown has not right interfering with the management of the river and its resources. This initiated the need for a deed settlement between the two parties. The deed settlement was signed in august 2008 and this brought the genesis of shared management ...

Distinguish between slander, libel, defamation, deceit, and trade slander, indicating the instances each would apply and the significance of the dissimilarity.
For a statement to be actionable and considered to be defamation, it has to be published, false, and derogatory and must refer to a specific person. If it refers to a group of people, it is not defamation. A defaming statement cannot be complimentary even if not true. It must also have the effect of disadvantaging the individual, in that it has to be told to a third party possibly the media causing other people to avoid the plaintiff.
Slander ...

Homework Written Assignment

Homework Written Assignment

IRAC for Assault

Issue: Is Bob liable for having assaulted Jack?
Rule: An assault is an intentional act that causes a person to reasonably apprehend or fear an immediate or imminent harmful or offensive act or contact against their person or body.
Analysis: Bob committed an intentional act because he flew through the air towards Jack’s direction, possibly with the aim of causing him harm or using some force to prevent Jack from being the first to purchase the 60-inch HD television. Jack must have had a reasonable apprehension or fear of an immediate harmful or offensive contact ...

Contract of Sale of a Good and Legal Obligations of Concerned Parties

Introduction
This research paper presents an analysis of a case study and is written to address breach of law of contract concerning sale of a good (bicycle) by a last year student named Jonas. He placed an advertisement in one of the sports magazine making an offer to the general public to sell his bicycle. Jonas was approached by two first year students named by Sarah and Saleh at different times on the same day. As this last year student was not aware about the telephonic message placed by Sarah, he sold the bicycle to another first year student ...

Introduction

Every lawyer can prove that modern justice system is not perfect. There are such cases that can be tried for months and even years. When such a case appears, a judge might find it difficult to sentence a defendant. This case study is devoted to a thorough analysis of one of such cases – the case State of New Jersey vs. Sonney Pelham. The essay will be divided into several parts. The first part will contain a brief case descriprtion.The second part –mens rea – will be devoted to the issue of innocence of the defendant. The third part – actus reus- will be dedicated to the ...

<Law>
<Tutor>
<Department>
The Flitland Crown Court convicted Dr. Arthur Jones for the crime of murder for withdrawal of life-support treatment to premature-born Baby X. Prior to his conviction, Dr. Jones did not dispute the antecedent facts that led to the death of Baby X. He reasoned out that the offense was committed to give way for the more viable Baby Y. There was only one available life-support system, and the question was, to whom he should administer the life-support treatment, to less viable Baby X or to more viable Baby Y?
...

Abstract

The number of worldwide issues concerning environmental safety and corporate social responsibility has been on an ever-increasing rate. This is why we can also see a significant growth in the demand for environment-friendly and self-sustaining buildings. The number of domestic and international organizations that monitor and facilitate the standardization by means of a tiered certification of such buildings has also been on an ever-increasing rate. The LEED certification program is one of the most prominent ones in the U.S. and the UC Davis Brewery, Winery, and Food buildings have received platinum grade certification under such program. The objective of this paper ...

Introduction

A contract denotes an activity between two willing parties to enter into an agreement that will be bidding to them and enforceable by law. It should be a voluntary affair. One party known as a promisor will make a promise to the promisee. The promisor’s promise is consideration for the promisee’s promise. A contract is unenforceable if it is void under common law or stature or is voidable at the option of the innocent party. There are various categories of contracts. The contract illustrated by the case study falls under the sales of goods contract. In order for a contact to ...

Using New York State Penal Law definitions, define and explain the differences between burglary and robbery

Robbery according to the New York law is defined as being equivalent to larceny which is the unlawful taking or the forcible stealing of property. Any crime committed when a person in the course of committing a larceny uses or threatens the direct use of physical force on another person with the intent to compel the owner of the property to at in a way that aids the commission of the larceny, to overcome any resistance to retain the property after taking it, to prevent resistance when taking the property or to compel the owner of the property to deliver it. According ...

Introduction

In the history of the United States of America, there have been many cases when the Constitution of the country has been violated. One of the most significant cases, regarding the issue of violating the Constitution of the United States of America, is the case Schenck vs. United States. The case was heard on the third March, 1919. This essay is devoted to the analysis of the case. The essay will be divided into several parts. The first part will be devoted to the issue of the case. In this part, I will outline the main peculiarities of the ...

Elements of the crime

Orr was arrested over an arson charge at a place called Atascadero. In order for the prosecution to prove that he was the person responsible for the crime, the following elements were identified. In this case, the prosecution provided both the Actus Reus and the Mens Rea element in their bid to charge Mr. Orr for the offense. On the Actus Reus section, the following factors were associated with the arson that Mr. Orr was under accusation. The factors included the physical manifestations that placed him on a probability scale of being the mastermind in setting the place ablaze.

Actus Reus

The prosecution ...

U.S. 211, Addyston Pipe and Steel Company v. U.S. (1899)
U.S. 211, Addyston Pipe and Steel Company v. U.S. (1899)
1. Provision of the Antitrust Laws
The provisions invoked in the case were sections one and two of the Sherman Act, 1890. The provisions illegalized any persons or group of persons who shall in one way or another conduct themselves in a manner that would restrain trade. The conduct includes matters of contract and or trusts. In addition, the Constitutional clause on commercial transactions between states was also invoked as being ancillary to the matters at hand.
...

- Issues for Tom Muccio
Tom Muccio has the responsibility of renegotiating with Wal-Mart for a deal that does not pressurize the retailer to accept large product inventories. The extra inventory would require Proctor and Gamble (P&G) to do advertising and to offer price specials for the goods to move, this is extra expenses for P&G (Sebenius & Knebel 3). Internal letdowns is another issue, whereby P&G lacks the incentive and structure for customer relationship improvement, there were internal conflicts between the new teams approach and the sales people who wanted to handle both sales and customer handling as it ...

It is evident from the case study that Fortin was victimized because of her employer’s antiunion discrimination. It is noted that the warnings issued to Fortin were initiated by her comments that the workers wanted to better themselves. In addition, three warning letters were issued at only two days from the day she made the comments (NLRB, 2000). This has been cynical; since, she had been promoted and commended for an increasing number of sales at the metro Dade account within the same year. Moreover, the performance appraisal process had been fabricated to implicate her with poor performance, ...

1. Which of the four privacy torts are involved with regard to this case? Is this a case of libel?

Libels as well with the invasion of privacy are two very important issues in communication law. Libel denotes to anything falsely printed and observed communication created of an individual with the intent to denigrate that individual. It is a printed depiction transmitting an unfair and inauspicious notion primed with the aim of spoiling an individual's repute. If the accused is capable of illustrating that the derogatory proclamation is fundamentally accurate, then the claimant's claim for libel will be unsuccessful. The publication requires solely be to a single individual, however it ought to be a declaration which declares to be reality, and is ...

Introduction

Euro Disneyland was opened in 1992 at Paris in a 5 billion project with the main intention of merging Disney and Paris (Matlack & Sager, 2003). In USA and Tokyo Disney was a success and it was the intention of the management then to replicate the same success to Paris. However, the first instance the park opened there was a hurdle in the form of farmers who blocked the entrance with tractors as a protest to the American government who pushed for cutting of French Agricultural subsidies (Matlack & Sager). This was a sign of the future being marred by difficulties despite the positive ...

Foing-nova is an IT company located in Varaždin, Croatia, which provides software for users of the state budget. However, Foing-nova remains a small business despite recently changing its location and expanding its headquarters. After consulting RajkoTomiek, who is the CEO of Foing-nova, it was clearly understood that the most suitable method of company’s expansion would be to increase their market share. Although, Foing-nova is expected to gain new customers by entering a new market and thus become more profitable. However, a strategy must be put in place to ease the diversification of the company and to ensure ...

HRM Issues in an Insurance Company

The Cases discussed below are related to Human Resource Management, experienced by the author as a human resource manager in an Australian Health Insurance firm. Each case has some distinct features typical of HR function and are addressed by the author using the relevant theories and practices on the issues. The cases are presented below

Scenario 1

This case represents a situation where a young male employee GS has been promoted as the manager in a regional office which is comparatively smaller than his previous location. His team consists of mainly part time female members, with similar and educational backgrounds and ...

The increase in the number of corporation necessitated the formation of cooperate governance, which is a particular set of laws and practical approach through which organization is directed as well as controlled to focus on the internal and external corporate structures, with the intention of monitoring the management's actions, including those of the directors. Thereby instituting measures that may stem misdeed of corporate officers. The paper tests whether Citic Pacific as a company applied corporate governance in its oversea deals. The empirical evidence based on exhibits will be the supporting documents of the literary content written. First, the paper ...

Business Law

The case is a promissory estoppel situation where Dhafir acted upon Hansen’s legal action if any damages occur from the falling tree. Hansen can place a claim stating the cutting of the diseased limb and not the whole tree as a premise. The courts will still proceed with the promissory that Hansen made as it is the ignitor of Dhafir’s decision to cut the tree.

Legal Capacity to Contract and Requirement of Legality

The issue is the involvement of a minor in a contract before they attain the legal age of participating in one. The car sellers will hold John responsible for the debts as ...

Elements of a binding contract

The key elements of a binding contract are; offer, acceptance, consideration, intentions to create legal relations, privity of contract, capacity to contract and the fact that it must not be illegal or contrary to public morals(Cross & Miller 2008, 195).
An offer is an unequivocal statement expressing intention to be bound on precise terms with the party to whom it is made once it is accepted by the said party(Beckett 2015, 139). An offer has been distinguished from invitations to treat. For instance, in Fisher v Bell, display of goods in a shop in an invitation to treat ...

The workplace is comprised of individuals with different types and personalities. As a result, conflict is bound to be experienced at one time or another. However some instances witness the escalation of such aggression to unwarranted levels, in which case, those on the receiving end are left in a vulnerable position. Such situations can be explained as workplace violence and harassment. According to the Ontario Ministry of Labor, workplace violence involves the physical exertion of force or attempt to use force to an individual with the intention to cause physical harm. It can also be described as the interpretation ...

Identify

The relevant legal issue in the case study is whether a binding contract existed between Rosa and Basil. The facts indicate that Basil intended to purchase a table from Rosa. He even sent her a letter of confirmation. However, after seeing another piece of furniture on offer, he decided to buy that one instead and declined Rosa’s offer, via voicemail. Rosa insists that Basil enacted a binding contract for the purchase of her table. Through the application of relevant legal knowledge, this article will identify whether or not the issue raised by Rosa is valid enough to exercise ...

An American multinational company has recently employed Robert Lowe as a manager. Lowe gets a transfer to work in the multinationals’ branch in Paris. Lowe is enthusiastic towards the new place of work, and is eager to meet workers. He displays a friendly attitude towards developing a good working environment. Lowe decides to throw a big party and invites all the employees in the firm. His intention is to meet all the people in the office informally. Lowe is full of excitement since all the employees accept the invitation to the party. Lowe thinks that all the people are equally excited. Lowe offers a buffet ...

PART I

British Petroleum Company Profile
BP plc, formerly known as British Petroleum, is a UK based multinational oil and Gas Company with its headquarters located in London, England, United Kingdom. As of 2012, BP is the world’s sixth largest energy company in terms of market capitalisation, fifth largest company by revenues, and sixth largest oil and gas company by production (BP. Financial and Operating Information, 2008-2012). BP is a vertically integrated organisation and it has a strong presence in all areas of the gas sector, including exploration and production, refining, promotion, distribution, power generation, and trading. The company also operates in the ...

Introduction

In any undertaking or transaction, it is essential that the parties are guided by law. Contracts play the role of binding the parties to an agreement that they are obligated to perform some task. Basically, a contract refers to an agreement between two or more parties. The enforceability of a contract in a court of law is essential in that the parties to a contract can get a remedy if the other party fails to perform their duties. A typical contract should have an offer, acceptance and legal relations (Beale, 2002). These are necessary for any contract to be enforceable.
In this paper, ...

The essence of the firm/industry problem

The evolution of fast casual in the use of new concepts will dilute the market. In 2010, Chipotle enjoyed dominance since it became the first in the fast-casual segment and surpassed Panera bread and other competitors (Hitt & Ireland, 2007). With the emergence of new concepts, new entrants such as Better Burgers serve as potential threats of Chipotle.
Chipotle faces two strategic challenges that include consumer awareness and profitability in International expansion and increased competition from the quick service restaurants. In consumer awareness, the firm has to address two challenges. The consumers in the food market industry are not ...

Apple Anti-trust Case

Facts to the case
The publishers of the books were able to control the prices of e-books but with Amazon Company selling the books at a cheaper price, the publishers could not control or raise the prices at will. Amazon was using a discounted model strategy to sell the publishers' books, but the publishers could not keep up competition. This is because they considered the price to be very low and could not compete individually with Amazon.
The publishers, therefore, ganged up and collaborated in order to alienate and force the Amazon to sell the books at the publishers ...

ID Number

Abstract

On the 28th of February 1973, the Supreme Court released its 5-2 decision declaring the case of United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation must be remanded and reversed and supporting the law as constitutional. The verdict rested on the authority of the court over statutory construction. It was determined by the court’s opinion and was liberal in respect. The court conducted a review of the case through appeal and heard the case on the 17th of October 1972. The case started in the US District Court in Rhode Island and was heard straight from that court through ...

Introduction

The technology solution is intended to improve efficiency in both supplier activities and customers' activities to better standards unmatched by rival businesses with similar services. To maximize long-term sales, profits and retain customers, Myra needs to incorporate latest technology solutions that will uniquely define and differentiate her services from the rest of hairdressers. A team with strategic plan is most essential before initiating a business process to ensure effective and smooth transition from the traditional sales-related activities to the high-technology system.

Business process explanation

This study aims to provide solutions to Myra's UMUC Haircuts business which seeks to stay competitive in the market ...

The First Amendments legal concepts indicated in these case facts are defamation. It occurs when one makes a statement of purported fact that paints a person’s behavior or action as negative, and it tends adversely to damage the reputation of the person and that is communicated through publication to someone who is not the injured party. In this case, the defamation is in the form of libel.
The source of law that provides the legal test that should be applied in resolving this conflict is constitutional law. The U.S Constitution provides for the protection of rights of the citizens. ...

Foundation Course-

- Article: Creating Shared Value
The shared value concept encompasses policies and practices to enhance a firm’s competition as well as social and economical decision in the area of operations. The government pressurizes firms and makes shared value hard to achieve. Porter and Kramer (2011, p.63) asserts that the government has to collaborate with the businesses to achieve success in the society. The shared value concept focuses to connect the society and economic progress. A society must regulate the market to influence the government policy decisions. Shared value concept recognizes societal needs created by the firms’ internal costs. ...

The deceased, Carol Hoffman was murdered by her husband on the or about the evening of 10th or the early morning of 11th August 1981. They had earlier on spent the day together with their children and everything seemed fine. However, when they went to bed at night, David wanted to make love to his wife and when she refused, he choked her to death. After his wife’s death, David went to the basement of the house to call his mother (appellant) and asked her to go and sit in the living room. Sitting in the living room ...

Lewis v. United States

Facts: An undercover officer in the department of narcotics called Lewis to find out whether he would sell him marijuana. The officer disguised his identity; he identified himself as Jimmy the Pollack. Lewis agreed to the officer’s request and directed him to his residence where the transaction would take place. The officer went to the petitioner’s abode and made his purchase; these transactions happened severally. Lewis was on one occasion arrested and charged with infringing federal drug laws. The District Court convicted Lewis following a denial to pre-trial motion seeking to suppress. The First Circuit affirmed this decision.
...

Factual Background

The Respondent in this matter, Abel and his friends were indicted with bank robbery in the District Court, with his cohorts pleading guilty to the charge as framed. The respondent however, denied the offence and the matter went for trial whereby one of the cohorts named Ehle agreed to testify against him. The respondent then made known to the court of his intention to discredit the testimony by Ehle by calling a witness named Mills who would testify to the effect that Ehle had admitted to him that he intended to implicate the respondent so as to obtain favorable treatment ...

Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984)

Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
467 U.S. 837 (1984)
Facts: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 required some of the states which have not yet conformed to the national air quality standards of the EPA to comply with the set standards pursuant to the unamended Clean Air Act. The EPA enacted regulations which interpreted the term “stationary source” to permit the other states to treat all of the pollution-emitting devices coming from similar industrial group ...

U.S. v. Gypsum Co. (1950)

Question 1

This was a case, which was argued on October 19, 1950 and decided on November 27, 1950. The proceeding was actually filed in the year 1940 in District Court of United States for Colombia District by United States under the Attorney general’s authority. The complaint that was charged was a long –continued conspiracy or plot by the defendants in the restraint of trade in the gypsum products amongst numerous states and in Columbia District, and a like monopoly, all in desecration of Sherman Antitrust Act.
The defendants, appellees or respondents in this case, were the ...

Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005)
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005)

This was a case concerning a projected that was designed to create at least 1000 jobs, which would in turn lead to an increase in revenue through increased tax collection. Moreover, it was also the intention of the project designers that it would revitalize the economy of the city, more so the waterfront and downtown areas. The project received the consent from the requisite authorities in the city of London to commence in the year 2000. In order to realize ...

Question one – Case study

This case was heard by the Supreme Court at Brisbane in the state of Queensland. The judgment was delivered at Brisbane by Judge Fryberg on the 24th January, 2011.
The judge in the case was Fryberg J. The case was heard on the 2nd and 3rd December, 2010.
The Plaintiff in the case is Ms Mee Wah To, a landlord who owns a parcel of land located at 33 Lisson Grove, Wooloowin. The Defendant on the other hand is Miss Eugene Choi, a tenant of part of the land owned by Miss Mee Wah To.
The counsel for the ...

Identity theft is a crime characterized by wrong acquisition and use of another person’s data in a deceptive and fraudulent manner for economic or other purposes. The World Wide Web has made it possible to obtain another person’s data and use in a fraudulent manner without his consent. Unlike fingerprints which are unique for each and every person, personal data especially social security numbers, bank account numbers, telephone calling card numbers and other information if they fall in the wrong hands, they may be used for the wrong reasons and cause considerable damage. In the United States for instance, a lot ...

Business

Introduction
Contracts are legal binding agreement that brings two or more parties together. The law of contracts is very vital to people involved in entering the contract. For example, when one decides to buy an item from the supplier with some terms and conditions in place, they may decide to sign a contract depending on the mode of payment. Contracts need not to be in writing, but parties involved may decide to do so. Only people above the age of 18 are allowed to sign a contract. Contracts do have benefits and damages to the parties involved and more importantly, ...

LEGAL BRIEF OF CASE Kowalchuk v. Stroup Case 8-8

Supreme Court of New York
Summary of key facts: Plaintiffs are mother and son named, Evelyn Kowalchuk, who 88 years of age and a widow, together with her son, Peter Kowalchuk. The plaintiffs invested in brokerage accounts that were allegedly mismanaged by Matthew Stroup, the defendant in this case. The parties filed an arbitration proceeding case before NASD (National Association of Securities Dealers) in December 2005 for damages amounting $832,000 to against defendant for fraudulent handing of their accounts. Prior to the judgment of NASD, the parties entered a settlement agreement wherein Stroup offered to pay $285,000 on ...

Discussion Post

Discussion Post
- Define the terms material support or resources, training, military-type training, expert advice or assistance, critical infrastructure, and terrorist organization in relation to 18 United States Codes 2339, 2339B and 2339D
Anti-terrorist legislation under Title 18 U.S. Code in reference to “Mens Rea” pertains to a person with the intention or state of mind along with accompanying conduct by law describing the offense of supplying materials to terrorists. Under Title 18 aligned with Code(s) 2239 and 2339B “Mens Rea” specifically pertains to the act of a person charged as intentionally providing support to a terrorist group or ...

1. Does Tom have a contract of sale with the shop?
A contract of sale denotes a contract where be a seller agrees to transfer or transfers the title in the goods to another party for a money consideration, which is referred to as the price. When goods are on display at a shop window, this is an invitation to treat. This means a willingness on the part of the buyer to negotiate a contract of sale with the buyer. Therefore, there is no contract yet as the parties are not at consensus ad idem. In an old case of Harris v Nickerson (1873), the ...

The Influence of the Stalemate in the W.T.O on the E.U.: Global Europe as New Trade Policy
The Influence of the Stalemate in the W.T.O on the E.U.: Global Europe as New Trade Policy

Introduction

As an introduction, it is important to note that the European Union is one of the largest regional groups in the world. The group is an economic group which has continued to establish and execute various polices which have had a substantial effect on the trading activities in the member countries. Moreover, the group is also a political group. The recent stalemate in the world trade ...

Annotated bibliography

Cailleba, P., & Casteran, H. (2009). A quantitative study on the fair trade coffee consumer. Journal of Applied Business Research, 25(6), 31-46. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/227583556?accountid=45049

This article draws attention on the manners in which ethical behaviors

of consumers contributes to fair coffee trade. This is vital because most people purchase coffee depending on the consumer perception and values. However, the article also offers the French transactions case study conducted between 2005 and 2007, whose major aim was to find out the effects of personality traits, types of promotion and the characteristics of a product on coffee purchases. Further, the article goes ahead to investigate on the relationship between coffee purchases, personal ...

Executive Summary

This case study focuses on identifying fraudulent issues taking place in the given four situation of Forensic Accounting. It identifies the issue on hand for every situation and goes further to discuss the in details the presence of elements such as coercion, collusion, and concealment. Nevertheless, the paper utilizes the fraud triangle to explain how the fraudulent acts are committed. The conclusion for each situation discusses the possible ways of addressing the issues being identified.

Introduction

Fraud have been on rise in forensic Accounting creating path for more investigations in order to identify ways in which these frauds arise and ...

Google is a large multinational organization involved in business of internet search, cloud computing and internet advertising technologies. Headquartered in Silicon Valley, It is one of the most profitable and widely recognized internet companies in the world. The work environment in Google is considered to be the one of the most employee-friendly in the world and it attracts one of the brightest and most entrepreneurial individuals into the organization. However in 2010 it was found that the turnover was on a sudden rise with many of its key employees leaving to either join other competent organizations or start-up their own business. ...

Introduction

Perturbation method and method of strained coordinates is usually not in a position of computing standard legitimate expansions in cases, in which steep changes in dependent variables occurs in particular sections of the domain of the independent variables. In such occurrences, simple expansions are used to simplify such section, and strained coordinates that are almost similar to them are not able to handle the steep changes. In order to acquire standardized legitimate expansions, one must acknowledge and embrace the fact that the steep changes are featured by the magnified scales, which are distinct from the scale featuring the behavior of ...

Question 1

According to the corporations act 2001 (cth), section 249H subsection 1 a valid notice of a meeting of a meeting of shareholders should be at least 21 days. The only exception to this rule is when all the members of the company agree beforehand for a shorter notice or when members of the company who have 95% of the voting power or more agree beforehand on the issue of a notice shorter than 21 days. The company issued a notice of seven days, which is less than the legal requirement by 14 days. The annual general meeting of the Sparx Ltd was therefore not valid ...