Privilege Case Studies Samples For Students

Miranda v. Arizona, Terry v. Ohio

The case involves an appeal in the U.S. Supreme Court against conviction of Ernest Miranda for rape and kidnapping of a young woman and sentencing him for 20 to 30 years of imprisonment on each charge to run concurrently.

Facts of the case

Ernest Miranda, a young Mexican man about 28 years old, kidnapped and raped an 18-year old woman Lois Ann Jameson while she had been returning home from Paramount Theater in downtown Phoenix where she worked along with a coworker and after she got down from the bus alone. After complaining to the police, Lois could not identify ...

Walmart Stores v. Cockrell (2001)

Issue: Does the shopkeeper's privilege protect Walmart from the liability under the circumstances of the case?

Rule of Law: Given the notion of the shopkeeper'e privilege, this rule allows the supermarkets to detain, stop or conduct the investigation of the shoplifters in case of any suspicion exists. In this case the supermarket does not responsible for such false imprisonment if there are reasonable grounds for the denetion of such a kind, within reasonable time, while the investigations of reasonable person is provided in reasonable manner (Cheeseman, 2014. p.88).
Analysis: At first, the Court considered the elements of false imprisonment. It stated that Cockrell was detained by the officer of Walmart ...

As Chief of Staff, my assignment is to create a response for you on the topic Medicare Crisis. I understand that you have been requested to take an interest in a board dialog and give a reaction concerning the Medicare financing crisis. The board examination will concentrate on the proposition of diminishing Medicare uses by enlisting members in HMO's. The National medical coverage framework for Americans started back with President Teddy Roosevelt, his stage when he kept running for president in 1912 included health care coverage. Roosevelt's thought for a national health arrangement was put on hold until U.S. ...

Google initially argued that filtering Internet content is less damaging than riot making its search engine available in the Chinese market. Do you agree?
I agree with Google, as I think that complying with Chinese rules and filtering Internet content is less damaging than riot making its search engine available in the Chinese market, as it brings fewer problems with Chinese government, fewer conflicts, and less financial losses. Furthermore, Google’s decision secures its position in China and allows the company operating there, while the riot can lead to Google’s exit from Chinese market without any possibilities to ...

Introduction

- What is students freedom of expression

Discuss its extent and limitations in modern societies of students’ freedom of expression

Explain some diverse interpretations of students’ freedom of expression
How students’ freedom of expression is unique in relation to student publications
Conclusion
- Personal views regarding students freedom of expression emerging from chapter 10

Abstract

This essay encompasses discussions pertaining to students’ freedom of expression as it pertains to schools in United States of America. A case study contained in chapter 10 of teacher and the law will reviewed in an attempt to reflect on what is students freedom of expression; its extent and limitations in modern societies; explain some ...

The film Legally Blonde pretends to be a celebration of the power of women in the dusty, sexist halls of Harvard Yard, but in fact it is a comedy that uses the time-tested ability of sexist roles to gain cheap laughs and play to the tastes of those who snicker at women, believing them to be less able than men and qualifying all of their successes at having been based on luck or some other sort of dynamic than true competence. Reese Witherspoon stars as Elle Woods, a sorority girl who fits every stereotype of the naïve blonde. She catches the ...