Claim College Essays Samples For Students

The concept of critical thinking entails a way of finding out whether the information received is true or false. There are six principles that govern the process of critical thinking.
The first principle dictates that for an extraordinary claim to be made it must be supported by extraordinary evidence. The level of extraordinariness of a claim is determined by how much a claim goes against what we already believe. The more a claim is unexpected, the more one needs in terms of supporting evidence so that a claim can be believed. This theory is important in critical thinking because it pushes one beyond ...

Introduction

A Freight claim/transportation claim/cargo claim/damage claim refers to a legal demand by a consignee or a shipper to a carrier or shipper for financial reimbursement for damage or a loss of a shipment. The intention of this claim is for the shipper or a carrier to make consignee or shipper whole. In general, claimants are expected to file the claim to recover the costs, but not including the profits. In addition, claimants are expected to take sound measures to mitigate damage or loss. For instance, in case the product that is damaged has retained some of its value, the carrier or shipper is only required to ...

Introduction

Deforestation is one of the environmental problems that the world is experiencing today. Humankinds’ characterization of the problems and the process of looking for possible solutions to the issue embody the social constructionism of the problem. The problem has been socially constructed overtime by people of the world, through research, scholarly claims, provision of evidence of the reality of the issue and the need to solve the problem, as well as the real social, political and economic implications of the issue. In line with the concept of social constructionism, the aforementioned issue is not a result of mere nature’s ...

Introduction

Autonomy, defined as “self-directing freedom and especially moral independence” (Merriam-Webster, 2013), is a concept that encompasses human rationality. It is a notion that has strong linkages to the idea of freedom, although those definitions have different concepts based on various perspectives. Notwithstanding the variations, autonomy is a feature that characterizes the freethinking nature of humans. With freethinking comes openness to accept any possibilities that could emerge as consequences to particular actions thought autonomously.

The notion of German philosopher Immanuel Kant is among those that have stood out in the literature of autonomy. Kant premised that humans act based on specific moral tenets – away ...

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a reasonable explanation on the right of the injured party in a commercial contract to file for damages on the breach of contract. The applicable Incoterm contract was also discussed based on the non-delivery of goods as stated in the contract. The article discussed the rights available to the buyer or the seller for the failure on the part of one of the parties to the commercial contract to fulfill their obligations that were previously agreed upon. The valid grounds that will allow the parties to recover for damages were also ...

“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth” (Marcus Aurelius). The knower’s perspective is essential in the pursuit of knowledge. This aspect of knowledge is something worth considering because the nature of the human mindset is made in such a way that perspective always creates a filter on the way one interprets life and “truth”. One could even say that without perspective, there would be no need for the pursuit of knowledge. It is nearly unavoidable to remove one’s perspective when pursuing knowledge because it is often ...

Introduction

The United States of America is among the superpowers of the world, and anything that changes in this country has impacted all the countries around the world. Their decision, foreign policies, trade, commerce, military affairs, politics, economic policies, and others have a huge influence on the politics, economy, defenses, and foreign policies of developed and developing countries. The United States is a democratic country, and the President of the state is the head of the country's government.

Moreover, they have a direct form of elections in which people voted after every four years to elect the President of the country. Two ...

In the Crito, an astonishingly solid claim has been made by Socrates about the authority of the state, in terms of the principles of right and wrong behavior. However, his claim does not seem consistent not only with another underlying claim that has been made in the Crito, but also with particular claims that have been made by him in the Apology. The purpose of this short essay is to argue that it is actually possible to interpret the claims that Socrates makes about the state’s authority in a way that inconsistencies with other claims are removed.
At ...

“Is Google Making Us Stupid?”

Since its creation in the 1990s, the internet has been an immense tool in acquiring knowledge in an instant. To help with the pursuit of knowledge, search engines, such as Google, have continuously been created in hopes of being the better way of finding specific information. Recently, there has been some concern about the constant use of Google and how it affects peoples’ mentality. The people who are against using Google on every search claim that the engine is making people stupid by replacing learning knowledge and critical thinking skills with simply obtaining information at the quickest convenience. It ...

Although the Spratly and Paracel Islands don’t look like much—they’re little more than outcroppings of rock in the South China Sea, after all—they are the subject of serious debate in the international community, and a number of countries are becoming exceptionally territorial over their claims to the islands. These islands are known by a number of different names, depending on the country; for the purposes of this discussion, and in the interests of relative clarity, the English name for these islands—the Spratly Islands—will be used exclusively in the text to refer to these ...

The first principle is ruling out rival hypotheses. This principle means that only one explanation would be relevant in explaining a given claim. A situation may be defined by different arguments or explanation, which may be seen as relevant to a given a situation. However, most of them may not be relevant in making excellent conclusion over a given matter. At a pool of explanations, the most outstanding explanation matters most. Although, it is a bit hard to differentiate, or identify the most outstanding explanation individuals ...

Identify one activist claims maker group (i.e a social movement organization) (please identify this claims making group in a way that I could find out more about them with relative ease, i.e. a google search of their name) Make sure to define kay terms/ concepts in your answer.
The activist group I found that is committed to taking a stance on the issue of online gaming addiction is called The Mothers Against Videogame Addiction and Violence (MAVAV). According to the MAVAV website, the organization is “dedicated to educating parents of the world's fastest growing addiction and the most reckless endangerment of children ...

Explain Whether Anybody In The Scenario Below May Have A Claim In The Tort Of Negligence

“Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” Per Alderson B. and Blyth V (1856).
In order to establish an understanding with regards to negligence it is very necessary to examine with clarity that whether the defendant is truly careless or ignorant when it comes to performing his duties. And at the same time did ...

PSYCHOLOGY

Instruction: This week’s activity will focus on planning your Data Analysis for your Capstone. You may want to review Chapter 3’s table 3.3 for words associated with correlation (association claims) or significance testing (causal claim). You may also want to review the lectures on descriptive/frequency methods.

For the follow below, indicate whether you would need to conduct a frequency/descriptive study, correlational study (association claim), or significance testing (causal claim).

“Mars candy bars causes children to be hyper”

This study would require Significant testing because of the word causes which is a causal claim.
“Watching violent shows is linked to increased aggression”
This study would be ...

Intentional Torts

Essay Question 1:
Manny Ramirez is a professional baseball player. He is a great hitter, but is also somewhat quirky and controversial. Because of his quirkiness, the Boston Red Sox decided to trade him to another team, the Los Angeles Dodgers. The Boston print and radio media has been very hard on Ramirez. Two radio talk show hosts, John and Gerry have been repeatedly very critical of Manny, with John states “good riddance” and Gerry states “who needs him” and “he’s a lousy ballplayer” on the air. Manny heard these comments while listening to the radio on the ...

In the captivating world of “House of the Dragon,” Rhaenyra Targaryen, initially played by the actress Milly Alcock, emerges as a formidable character, defying societal norms and challenging the traditional constraints imposed upon women in leadership roles. It is fascinating to explore the significance of Rhaenyra’s image for modern women aspiring to lead, showcasing her fierce ambition, resilience, and determination to claim the Iron Throne. As Rhaenyra’s journey is analyzed, it becomes apparent how her portrayal as a powerful and multifaceted leader not only empowers audiences but also serves as a compelling reminder of the potential and strength ...

As a matter of fact and law, it is indeed true that to successfully bring a claim in negligence, the claimant has to prove on a balance of probabilities the existence of a duty of care, breach of that duty by the defendant and a resultant loss, harm or injury to them. This is known as "the three-part test" for negligence. In addition to these essential elements of the tort of negligence, no defenses should be applicable if a claim is to succeed. However, successfully proving the existence of these elements and getting remedies from courts is not a ...

Transgender persons have long been experiencing various forms of discrimination on the basis of their sex. These people experience a wide gap between their anatomical sex and their gender structure. As a result, many transgender people have at one time experienced anxiety and distress that there is no proper reflection of their gender and the way they portray themselves. In this sense, there should be great consideration of the legal rights of the transgender people so that they may not face certain challenges such as school discrimination, lack of quality public service and difficulties in getting appropriate gender designations.
...

INTRODUCTION

Adequate comprehension of the composition of the mind is somewhat challenging from the literal perspective. Precisely, it is difficult to explain how the consciousness occurs from a scientific perspective due to the presence of the complexities of the human cognition. David Chalmers (1995) proposes that there are many “easy” problems of consciousness, but one genuinely “hard” problem, namely what philosophers call “qualia”, or phenomenal experience. He argues that the reductive physical, mechanical and functional explanations made by cognitive science are only adequate to explain the easy problems, and that the hard problem requires explanations different not just in difficulty, ...

In the case of Giesecke & Devrient v Minister of Safety and Security (Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa) the main issue was admissibility of hearsay as evidence as per s 3(1)(c) of the Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988. Giesecke & Devrient was the appellant while Minister of Safety and Security was the respondent. In the case, it was ruled that hearsay could not be admitted as evidence.
The appellant was involved in the provision of cash processing as well as security services for a number of clients including banks and casinos. One of its ...

Controversy emerged as the city council in Charlotte City, North Carolina, pushed for the approval of an ordinance that aims to provide a wider protections for the LGBT community. In an article entitled Governor Wants Transgender Restroom Rule Blocked which was recently published in ABC News, Governor Pat McCrory expressed his disappointment when the city council voted for the revision of the existing non-discrimination city ordinance. The proposed revision included an order where people were explicitly allowed to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. The governor’s argument against the city council’s decision is in it, ...

In the article by BBC news, it can be seen that there is a claim which is made by the president of the United States of America. In this article Obama is seen to comment that smoking marijuana is just as dangerous as drinking alcohol. In this article, the claim being made is that Marijuana has the same effects as drinking alcohol both socially and health wise. This is a conclusion he made to a long lasting debate in which there has been arguments of whether the use of the drug should be made legal or not or whether the sentencing of ...

Mary Lefkowitz’s book Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History is Lefkowitz’s defense of the teaching profession against people who view the opportunity to teach a college class as a chance to inculcate the next generation with one’s own political views. Lefkowitz originally ran into Afrocentrism in the early 1990s when she found that actual scholars were teaching and writing that the civilization of the ancient Greeks had come wholesale across the Mediterranean Sea from Egypt, as well as that people in ancient Egypt like Cleopatra were black – in addition to ...

Concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh,

Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia v. Singapore)
The present decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) deals with the sovereignty of three land features located at the mouth of the straits of Singapore, between Malaysia to the north and Indonesia to the south. Sovereignty is defined as supreme power or authority and determining which state has that power over specific locations is a topic within international law. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the three land features, which will be called Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Putech (translates to “White Rock” from the Portuguese and Malaysian, respectively), Middle Rocks, ...

Having been involved in several cases, Daniel Groll’s intention to provide a lasting solution to this problem intensified. His intentions are to develop a model for understanding disagreements in a clinical setting. Groll at providing insight into what doctors can and cannot plausibly be said to know regarding what’s best for their patients. Groll deals with this by developing taxonomy of clinical disagreements. Groll’s secondary aim is to show that Robert M. Veatch’s theory on what on what clinicians can and cannot about their patients’ well-being is overly skeptical and limits the role. In the article, Groll presents a ...

Introduction

The English legal system is based on elements of the Christian Bible and its tradition. This comes with some moral concepts like lying about other persons and spreading false information. Defamation is made up of libel and slander. Whereas libel is a false and damaging comment written down, slander refers to such a statement spoken orally. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a critical analysis of the concept of defamation and how it relates to media law.

Basically, every human being has a right to a reputation. Reputation is a kind of personal right that embodies a ...

A Rhetorical Analysis

In order to have a solid ground for rhetorical analysis, this paper has chosen a particular angle of collective memory as the artifact to be studied. Because collective memory deals with a memory of an event shared by a certain group of people, it is only fitting that we examine an event of national importance, something that had marked in the history of America and the World. One event that falls into that category is the 9/11 incident. Thus, in this paper, we will try to analyze a collective memory by dissecting the rhetorical appeals and tools used in an online article dedicated to ...

In modern business, it is almost impossible not to transact without the use of credit. Often, the amounts of business expenses outmatches the business incomes or at least at one time or another. In order to shore up one’s deficits, it is essential to obtain loans to fill in the gaps. In addition, some businesses generally require additional capital outlay to operate. It is advisable that an entity settles for the best capital mix that balances the assets and liabilities well. An entity must have just the right ratio of debt and equity capital. In accessing debt capital, ...

Introduction

It is a sad fact is that rape remains a common crime all over the world, and different countries have different punishments for convicted rapists. Chemical castration is a process where drugs are used for reducing sexual activity and libido of the convicts. Among all the options that are present in the judicial systems, probably the most logical solution is chemical castration. Chemical castration is a process where drugs are used for reducing sexual activity and libido of the convicts (Park). Even though some people might claim that chemical castration seems too harsh a punishment, but it is only ...

The issue before the court in this case was whether this standard of proof was the proper standard to be used in determining retaliation or was the appropriate standard the “motivating factor” standard. Or more specifically, whether a plaintiff claiming retaliation can win a claim based on discrimination being a “motivating factor” for retaliation or must the plaintiff show that the discrimination was the reason for the retaliation. In addressing this issue, the United States Supreme Court determined that the standard of proof used to allege a claim for retaliation under Title VII must be the but for test ...

In the op-ed “In ‘The Piano Lesson,’ a Family Fight Over an Heirloom Rooted in Slavery” by Ken Jaworowski posted in The New York Times last 26 Jan 2016, the author describes the method of acting by the performers. There are several words and ways that can be used to describe the different aspects of a play, but to be able to do it in an objective manner is not easy. Theatrical performances generally involve emotions, and in writing a review about on, it is difficult to move away from capitalizing on the emotions implied while staying objective about ...

Question 1: Ensuring compliant coding and billing

Adhering to accurate coding and billing processes is one of the most important elements in ensuring RCM coding and billing compliance. A critical process that can be used to ensure RCM practices comply with coding and billing regulatory guidance and industry standards is regular monitoring and auditing of medical claims before submission for payments such as the ICD-10 standards (CureMD, 2016; Kochhar, n.d.). Frequent request follow-up and verification activities improve and strengthen the overall coding and billing processes of a firm by helping ensure that all the necessary right safeguards are in place to avoid errors (MetricStream Inc., 2016). ...

In his article “Revenge of the Nerds”, Steven Pinkler analyzes how and why humans, of all the animals on the planet, evolved on the cognitive niche and became the dominant species. His main claim is that human ancestors’ particular characteristics, namely visual orientation, social living, particular hand development, and hunting, made them more apt to evolve causal reasoning than any other animal on the planet. The article is clearly organized and structured in order to create a strong argument in favor of his thesis. He bases his claims on different types of evidence which try to prove not only ...

Knowledge is indeed a great privilege to posses, if you know something; it is easier to perform some functions. Possession of knowledge requires ethical responsibility as some knowledge may prove dangerous to the society and is rather kept secret for the good of all. The possession of knowledge carries the responsibility of sharing that knowledge depending on the situation. Knowledge is omnipresent and people can obtain it in many different ways (John 23). As such, every human being in the world has knowledge on something. However, this knowledge could be completely not important to one person, but could also be ...

There are some legal formalities and requirements of valid marriages in every civilised society. Under English law, every marriage is solemnised with a couple of formalities and liabilities that are to be followed by people who enter into a marriage. Marriage laws have become more relevant in today’s society as they provide security and stability to couples, but at the same time, marriage laws have become more complicated in order to fulfil swelling incidents of divorces and breakups due to intolerance between couples and various other reasons. This paper proposes a discussion on English marriage laws in respect of some specific ...

Supporters of the amendment claim that nuclear energy serves an important role in the energy mix because it helps in meeting the future generation’s energy demands. Proponents of the policy’s amendment claim that nuclear power provides clean energy because using nuclear energy does not destroy the ozone layer through emission of greenhouse gasses. Those who support amending the policy claim that nuclear power provides a solution to sustainable energy because producers can achieve continuous production of nuclear energy.
Opponents believe that the nuclear power has dangerous effects on human beings because the process of producing energy involves ...

Introduction

Employer employee relationship is based upon mutual trust. Employee should make every effort to fulfill expectations of employer while employers have an ethical, as well as, legal duty to provide an amicable environment to their employees. Employers are legally bound to ensure a safer and unprejudiced work environment for employees. There are various laws and regulations that protect employees’ rights and ensure appropriate implementation of employees’ rights and interests at the workplace. Employers cannot dismiss employees in arbitrary manner and merely on their will and such a behavior is strictly prohibited by the employment laws of United Kingdom. This paper intends ...

Introduction

It is popularly believed that the original Tibetan culture under the Dalai Lama was spiritual, non-violent and free from corruption, lust, and greed and that Tibetans lived happily in pre-1950 period before the invasion of the country by China. However, it is claimed by China that the reality was far from true as Tibetan society was marked by corruption, lust, greed, and barbarity. Not a long ago, the head of the Chinese administration for religious affairs, Ye Xiaowen, claimed in a published article in a state-run newspaper 'China Daily' that "History clearly reveals that the old Tibet was not the Shangri-La that ...

- Evaluation of a drug label including patient reported outcomes (Limit 2 pages)The evaluation of the PRO will include the following information:a) Company, generic, brand name and therapeutic class of the product

Brand name: HUMIRA

Generic name: adalimumab
Therapeutic class of the product: Antirheumatic
b) AHFS or other Drug Classification

AHFS: 92.00

c) FDA Approved Indication

Humira got FDA approval in the year 2002

e) Identity the type of studies that were conducted by the pharmaceutical company to support the PRO claims.
e.1. Trial design, randomization and blinding procedures
Ans: Mostly randomised clinical trials were designed to learn about the effects of Humira. Blinding was not performed to all ...

The first philosopher to define knowledge was Plato. He stated that for people to claim that they know something, the thing that they claim they know should be true. This is the first condition of knowledge. The knowledge should be true so that it can be proven to be so. The second condition of knowledge is that it should be believed that it is actually true. People should be able to believe that knowledge is true. The third condition is that the knowledge should have some form of justification. There should be some form of prove that the knowledge ...

Are Parisians really rude or arrogant or is this another stereotype?

Introduction
One of the critical issues that affect the study of human behavior is the way different people understand the responses given and give an accurate report on their findings. Various individuals have engaged in numerous anthropological and ethnographic researches in attempts to understand why some communities behave in certain ways. A widely held serotype is that Parisians are rude and arrogant and they often show a significant level of dislike to non-Parisians. However, this can be treated as individual’s perception, and researchers would want to confirm whether such stereotype is true. Some individuals tend to place judgment ...

Does all of the creation have equal rights? Or are some of the Earthlings more valuable than the others? This question has become a deep issue nowadays. While in the past, the moral status of animals was not strongly debated as there were more acute issues at the time, now this issue is rather actual. When the racism and sexism were defeated, and all humans gained equal rights, have not the time come for animals to get these rights? Should animals be given equal considerations of interests with humans? Peter Singer answers with a strong “yes.” He calls the ...

P1 Socrates in Plato’s Gorgias criticizes Orators who are public speakers and tyrants who are rulers and oppressors as unintelligent groups of people in the society. He further says of oration as a type of flattery. This claim by Socrates seems unfair and harsh, but he comes to a conclusion that Tyrants and Orators are unintelligent because, according to Socrates, having power translates to having something good for who has it. Therefore, Socrates views orators and tyrants as having power in the society that they think it is good for them. It is from this definition of a ...

People can be blind to love, truth, or reality in general. The reason can be strong emotions or an intention to escape a traumatizing situation. At the same time, the outcomes of such blindness are usually tragic. Euripides was a master of creating dramatic plays that encapsulated the strongest emotions of a person by engaging them into the traumatizing actions and experiences. Particularly, the topic of blindness is particularly vividly represented in Euripides’s “Medea” (Euripides 17). She is overwhelmed with her frustration and anger on Jason’s betrayal and humiliation. In the swirl of a blind rage Medea ...

The Existence of God: God is dead by Nietzsche

In a parable contained in his book titled “The Gay Science” Nietzsche made a controversial statement where he claimed that God is dead. Indeed, this statement elicited many opposing opinions not only because it appears inflammatory on the face of it, but also because of the philosophical weight it carried. Contained in the parable of “The Madman”, the text indicated,
“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under ...

The life story which is captured in “giving Voice to values and framing a life story” reflects the fight for justice for people whose rights to be compensated were violated. While I will be providing an evidenced case, the objective is to ensure that victims are fully rewarded with their rightful compensation and also in the amount that meets the given legal and ethical obligations on the part of the insuring company. This story therefore dwells on the principle of serving justice for the people who have various types of injuries who are seeking a fair assessment of the case ...

Globalization refers to the integration across the world arising from the interchange of products, aspects of culture, world views and ideas. Advances in telecommunication and transportation, rise of the internet are some of the major factors in globalization, harnessing more interdependence of cultural and economic activities.

Cons of globalization

According to Steger, there are five claims of market globalization and justice globalization. The first claim is global integration and liberalization of markets. He states that globalism begins with an ideology that attempts to establish a self-regulating market that serves as a model for future global order. The idea offers integration and liberalization of global ...

According to Lilienfeld (2011), there are six principles of scientific thought that must be applied when utilizing scientific thinking. It is commonly believed that scientific thinking need only be applied to scientific concepts; however, this is not the case. These six scientific principles can be applied to any type of claim, regardless of subject matter; these principles are methods for analyzing claims in any realm of study. The six principles of scientific thinking, according to Lilienfeld (2011), are as follows: first, that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; next, that a claim must be falsifiable if it is to be meaningful; ...

Psychology is the study of the mind, behavior and brain scientifically. Psychology brings out varies levels analysis, from to complex social and cultural influences, as well as from the brain to mind. Therefore, psychology is used throughout human life and cannot be exempted in any way. For that reason, psychologists are able to predict the natural behaviors of humans based on their daily activities. In order to study these behaviors, scientists have to come up with ways in which the analyses can be done. This has led to the creation of six scientific thinking principles that have been set ...

It is apt that use of binomial distributions on probability has sundry applications. They can be used in Businesses, Engineering mechanics, Marketing institutions, and other fields such as in Governmental Organizations. Determining if one brand of a product is preferred than the other, is an aspect of hypothesis testing. A hypothesis can be defined as a guess, which the claim is interested in proofing as either true or false.
In this essay discussion, a hypothesis test will be carried out using statistical means, and other methods to either support the claim or decline it. There are two ways of presenting a hypothesis. ...

Critically assess the current legal position of auditors in the UK and Ireland. Analyse the impact the current situation has on the competitiveness of the audit market and discuss some of the methods available to auditors to reduce their exposure to expensive litigation.

Introduction

Auditors are liable for both criminal and civil offenses. Criminal offenses arise when the auditors violate a government-imposed law. It will be a dispute between the State and the auditor. On the other hand, civil offences dispute are always between the individuals and /or organizations. The last two decades have seen the large 4 auditing companies settling the ...

Analysis of Argument of Who Improves the Lives of Young People in Apology 24d-25c)

The analysis of this paper looks at Socrates defense that he does not corrupt the youth of Athens. Specifically, the paper examines the passage from Apology (24d-25c). “Come, then, and tell these jurors ” to “Of course it is, whether you and Anytus say so or not”” will be addressed and considered.
First the conclusion of the argument Socrates makes is prefaced by the accusation that Socrates has been charged with corruption of the youth and not believing in the gods the city of Athens believes (24b). It is helpful to separate between Socrates argument, and the argument Socrates ...

Video games do not cause violent behavior

For over two decades, there has been a major debate of the influence of video games among children and other video game users (Claim). Of particular interest has been violent videogames such as Mortal Kombat, Grand Theft Auto among others that have for so long been linked to violent behavior among the youths (Ground). Recent reports suggest that the video games are not in any way related to violent behavior among the youths or any other user (Qualifier). In a report published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence, it was found out that playing of video games among the youths ...

For the past couple of months, several news organizations are reporting China’s astounding economic growth and subsequent mobilization in the Asian region which is both alarming and impressive for many experts. Their economic growth is astounding for the very fact it proves China is still an economic powerhouse even in today’s world given their history as the world’s first traders. On the other hand, however, the mobilization of its forces around its “claimed” territories is alarming because of the possible implications that China is now getting ready to overthrow the United States as the dominant force ...

Every country has a set of laws that take care of the employees in different working sectors. Many a times, employees find themselves being mistreated by their seniors in workplaces leading to poor job productivity, or even termination. The employment law takes care of the rights and obligations regarding the employer-employee interaction, and takes care of the current employees, new applicants, and the retired employees. The legal issues involved in an employment law are those related to wages, taxation, immediate termination, discrimination of any manner, and safety in workplaces. Even if most employment laws are governed by the responsible state and ...

Claim:

The advertisement is about a luxury car. The claim made in the advertisement is about an ultra Luxury car which the city has not experienced ever before. The claim presented in advertisement is, the car is utmost luxury and people should accept this fact and also People should use this luxury car.

Grounds:

The ground made in the advertisement is this city does not know any thing about luxury. It has been to the hell till now and started learning finer things in life from now on. This car will be an addition to their learning and will provide altogether new ...

Claim

The premature deaths of middle-aged Americans arise from many cases of suicide, an outbreak of liver diseases, regular use of painkillers as well as the overdose of drugs.

Part B

Based on the following sources the claim is true because the researchers of the articles consulted have given adequate attention to analyzing the causes of the premature deaths of the middle-aged white Americans. According to the article, "Mortality trends among working-age whites: the untold story," it is evident that most of the middle-aged Americans tend to die prematurely because of the overdose of drugs and the outbreak of liver diseases. “causes ...

In Plato's "Apology", Socrates' series of dialogues in the period preceding, during, and after his trial provide an insight into his mastery of rhetoric. That is especially true given his ability to arrange his arguments in a judicious manner. While not overly successful in persuading the jury, the final judgment appears to be as a result of bias and prejudice rather than having a weak argument in the various passages of the "Apology." Socrates makes a persuasive claim that it is not possible to separate wisdom from moral virtue. Therefore, by being a man of wisdom, he could not ...

Briefing Paper 1

a.) The “act of state doctrine” provides that a court in the United States, cannot pass judgement on the actions of a foreign government taken within their own country or territory that it has jurisdiction over (Cheeseman, 2012). In essence, the doctrine bars U.S. courts from interfering in the domestic policy actions of another government in their own country.
b.) Under a communist theory of the world, the government of Cuba did act ethically when it appropriately the Glens’ property. From an American perspective, the expropriation was not only ethically questionable but most likely illegal. Club Med, under the ...

1. Johnna: The essay’s thesis is a claim of value and it is maintained throughout the essay. The thesis is: “The public is the main reason that baseball players abuse performance enhancing drugs because the public has high expectations that athletes believe are unachievable without the use of steroids”. The main points of the essay are mentioned in the thesis. Body paragraphs begin with topic sentences and the ideas are well developed. The objections to the claim the readers might have are adequately addressed because the writer mentions that the athletes feel the pressure to use drugs because ...