Law is universal. It needs the keen understanding of the law in order to interpret it and be able to apply it in real life situation. It is essential to set the comparison of the direct appeals, and the post-conviction remedies. As stated it is crucial to understand the historical changes that will assist in finding post-conviction relief.
Post-conviction relief depicts a unique process in which there is civil remedy which is given by the Illinois’ post conviction hearing act. They are civil in nature their basic and core reason is to challenge and points out errors in the ...
Conviction College Essays Samples For Students
174 samples of this type
Do you feel the need to examine some previously written College Essays on Conviction before you begin writing an own piece? In this open-access catalog of Conviction College Essay examples, you are granted an exciting opportunity to examine meaningful topics, content structuring techniques, text flow, formatting styles, and other academically acclaimed writing practices. Using them while composing your own Conviction College Essay will surely allow you to finish the piece faster.
Presenting superb samples isn't the only way our free essays service can help students in their writing efforts – our authors can also compose from point zero a fully customized College Essay on Conviction that would make a genuine basis for your own academic work.
People tend to believe in many things in their life. There is a great number of rights and wrongs that people have established in their minds. For, example, children is a source of happiness. These believes that tend to make people happy are called super replicators. Thesis+2 Main Ideas: People believe that certain things should be replenished in order to guarantee them life or happiness and it is called super replicator, but there are other people who do not share this opinion.
Daniel Gilbert and Julia Alvarez take a position on the debate regarding super replicator. They believe ...
Introduction
Maeder, et al. (2016) defined “CSI effect” as the unreasonable expectations of jurors on the sophistication of forensic science as a consequence of learning about it through television programs, such as the CSI (Crime Scene Investigation), resulting in fewer convictions in the absence of sophisticated forensic evidence against the accused. Lobo and Schnobrich-Davis (2015) referred to this as the “Tech effect”, which essentially extends the definition into the advances in information dissemination technology and beyond ‘crime scene television shows’.
Article Summary
Research questions: The Lobo and Schnobrich-Davis (2015) study was guided by three research questions: (1) Does the CSI effect (as ...
Introduction
The cases below were presented in the court of law and their decisions were a foundation on which other similar cases could be based on. Law in its course is a very tough discipline more so for the individuals who have not trained well in that field. All the cases presented below addressed different types of crimes. Judges give verdict on cases by interpreting the law basing on judgements of previous cases similar to the one at hand. Two of the cases below address disorderly conduct, one entails threat communication and the other addresses the act of escaping from ...
(Class Information)
Mike Tyson became a celebrity in his own right. He earned a big name in boxing, not to mention the wealth that he gained from the same sport. However, his fame waned when the front pages of the tabloids and newspapers feasted on his conviction story for allegedly raping one of the aspirants in the Miss Black America beauty contest. The Daily News read, “Mike Tyson, the world heavyweight champion at 19, last night became a convicted rapist at 25, after a jury found he attacked an 18-year-old beauty pageant contestant in his hotel room here last ...
(University/Institute)
Abstract
The goal of the justice system, whether the military establishment or in civilian society, is that the appropriate penalty is levied against the offending party. In the context of the military organization, the punitive sanctions against erring personnel as well as a number of individuals connected with the military is the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) wherein the concept of “non-judicial punishment” is contained. The UCMJ regulates and oversees the conduct of all trial procedures as well as the determination of the proper forum for the litigation and resolution of the charges arrayed against service members. In ...
Plea Bargaining in American Society
Introduction
Plea bargaining plays a very significant role in the American criminal justice system. It is estimated that approximately 90% of all criminal cases are settled by plea bargain rather than trial by a jury as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United State Constitution. Throughout this paper, I will discuss what a plea bargain is, benefits of plea bargains, disadvantages of plea bargains, the role of the victim in the plea bargaining process, and recent developments in plea bargaining.
What is Plea Bargaining?
In the American court system, a plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case in ...
Philosophy is the study of the types of punishments that government imposes on individuals who participate in criminal offences. Punishment philosophy entails an intensive analysis of punishment procedures and their effectiveness in rehabilitating the victims that undergo the punishment process. Many philosophers have come up with varying versions that explain the theory of punishment. Some philosophers have come out strongly to detest the act of punishing criminal offenders. They argue that punishment does not help in changing the morals of a criminal. According to these philosophers, punishment can only be effective on criminals who are in their early stages of ...
The United States has one of the most complex and fascinating criminal justice systems in the world. The reason that the United States has such a unique criminal justice system, is that the founding fathers based their principles from superior legal frameworks around the world. For example, the founding fathers were known for looking to English, French, and other European Legal Frameworks, (The United States Constitution). Additionally, the founding fathers thought to their education of Roman Law and the laws of Ancient Greece, (The United States Constitution). For this reason, the United States has a unique array of principles ...
Some cities were imagined, designed and created wholly or partially in a way that forever provided shape for their histories and identities, governments and religions as well as for the economies of their citizens. An example is the great city of Jerusalem. Whatever they were or however they developed later in time, the details of their foundation, along the momentous and monumental contractions that redesigned or redefined various sectors within them make them case studies in the historical processes that surround cities as well as their regional and continental effects. The paper attempts to identify the evolution of Jerusalem ...
385 U.S. 293 (1966)
Issue
The main concern raised by the current case was whether evidence gotten by the government through deceptive placement of a secret informer in the councils and quarters of a defendant in the event of a criminal trial accrues as a criminal act. In fact, the main issue was whether such an act infringes on a defendant’s rights as enshrined in the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments. As connoted by these amendments suppression of evidence obtained under such circumstances is only allowed in subsequent trials of the same defendant, but on a varying charge (Osteburg & Ward 10).
Ruling
The Judgement was affirmed.
...
Debbie, a District Attorney, who is the prosecutor where Jill Smith is facing charges of murder and other drug related charges, is certainly guilty of prosecutorial misconduct on her part. A background of the facts of the case is helpful in this instance. It is the case that Debbie has allowed her past convictions about Smith’s character weigh on her decision to secure conviction since Smith was absolved of the offence on a technicality. Based on the prior conviction that she had secured against Smith in an earlier case and the consequent acquittal by the appeal court on a technicality, Debbie ...
Darlie Routier from Rowlett, Texas is an American woman that was convicted for the murder of her five- year old son, Damon. Coincidentally both of her sons, 6 year old Devon and 5 year old Damon died during the attack but the conviction only tried the murder of Damon. During the fateful day Routier claimed that her house had been broken into and that an intruder had repeatedly stabbed 2 of her sons. Upon arrival policemen secured the area to collect evidence but a search in the house did not indicate any signs of forced entry. Her 2 sons ...
Introduction
Deception is the act of telling a deliberate lie or giving some misleading information deliberately. It is a very common act within the society, and self-reporting researches have shown that every person tells approximately two lies per day and tells a lie once in every four, social interactions (Albrechtsen, 2010). Bearing in mind that the decisions made in the criminal justice system has severe consequences on an individual, there raises the question of whether deception is ethical within this system, and whether the end justifies the means. This paper aims at investigating deception by the investigation officers within the criminal justice system ...
Probation Officer’s Report
The following is a report prepared on request of His Honour George Huges
of the the Provincial Court of Alberta
in regards to
Virginia Jane White
who is due to appear for Sentencing on
Report prepared by:
Personal Information:
Current Charges:
Criminal Record History:
Comments:
The defendant has no previous criminal convictions.
Police Report Summary:
According to the Metropolis City Police Department, their officers were called out to the Dresswell Clothing Store on March 2nd, 2001. This was in response to a shoplifting complaint from the store security manager. The officers arrived to find that Mrs. White had been ...
Introduction
It is a sad fact is that rape remains a common crime all over the world, and different countries have different punishments for convicted rapists. Chemical castration is a process where drugs are used for reducing sexual activity and libido of the convicts. Among all the options that are present in the judicial systems, probably the most logical solution is chemical castration. Chemical castration is a process where drugs are used for reducing sexual activity and libido of the convicts (Park). Even though some people might claim that chemical castration seems too harsh a punishment, but it is only ...
Part 1: Prosecutor’s Duty to Report
Although the American criminal law is based on the adversarial system where the prosecutor, representing the state, and the defense, representing the accused, engage in openly confrontational activities in order to persuade a neutral decision-maker of the truth of their story; the Supreme Court has held that under some circumstance, and despite the adversarial nature of the relationship, the prosecution must assist the defense in the preparation of their case.
The underlying reason for this counter-intuitive element of the adversarial system, is the traditional belief that the substantial power of the state, as expressed through its law enforcement and ...
The Existence of God: God is dead by Nietzsche
In a parable contained in his book titled “The Gay Science” Nietzsche made a controversial statement where he claimed that God is dead. Indeed, this statement elicited many opposing opinions not only because it appears inflammatory on the face of it, but also because of the philosophical weight it carried. Contained in the parable of “The Madman”, the text indicated,
“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under ...
Although the American criminal law is based on the adversarial system where the prosecutor, representing the state, and the defense, representing the accused, engage in openly confrontational activities in order to persuade a neutral decision-maker of the truth of their story; the Supreme Court has held that under some circumstance, and despite the adversarial nature of the relationship, the prosecution must assist the defense in the preparation of their case.
The underlying reason for this counter-intuitive element of the adversarial system, is the traditional belief that the substantial power of the state, as expressed through its law enforcement and ...
Introduction
America is hailed as the land of freedom and opportunity. A large part of this freedom is that citizens have the right to speak their minds freely without fear of government persecution. Public debate is a crucial component to the American ideal of democracy and a society self-governed by the people. The principle of free speech and free expression is jealously guarded and enshrined in the Constitution. The First Amendment reads, “Congress shall make no lawabridging the freedom of speech” (U.S. Const. amend. I). Over the years, the Supreme Court has interpreted many challenging questions arising under the First ...
On the 18th December 1975, Maureen Kelly proceeded to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals to challenge the ruling of a nonjury trial regarding her unlawful entry to the Statler Hotel. In the earlier trial, she was convicted of violating D.C Code of 1973 by showing up in the hotel premises after being issued a barring notice. The Court of Appeals later decided that the appellate was guilty of the allegations since the hotel’s management had issued a warning for her arrest (Court Listener, 2016). Nonetheless, one may wonder whether this ruling is justifiable. Precisely, does the ...
Identification Procedures Line Ups and Show Ups
Identification Procedures Line Ups and
Police lineups have been used for decades in criminal cases. The witnesses who seen the criminal can look at a line up and pick out the person he had seen when a crime was committed. This process has been used to help identify and charge an individual with a crime. A police lineup may involve real people or may be photographs of individuals. Usually, the lineups will have the person who committed the crime, and approximately five fill in people to choose from.
There is a process that needs to be followed when police ...
Introduction
The country’s criminal justice is one of hallmarks of modern civilizations. It secures the rights and liberties enjoyed by modern Americans. Its three components – law enforcement, courts and corrections – all work together and separately to ensure that the vision of the founding fathers continue to guide the country. Each of the components, for example, should ideally abide by the principles of due process and equality. As shown in the case study being considered here, all components apply in processing a person’s entry into the system.
Description of Murder
Murder is defined by 18 U.S. Code § 1111 (a) as “the unlawful killing of a ...
Argued December 2, 3. 1913
Decided February 24, 1914
An indictment was made on the defendant Fremont Weeks for using the postal mail for the transportation of lottery tickets, which was a criminal code violation. The police arrested him at his place of work and in arresting him; they conducted a warrantless search on his office and found evidence of the usage of the mail for the transport of lottery tickets. The police later went to Week’s home and entered illegally using a key whose hiding place was directed to them by a neighbor. The police later went on to search the defendant’s premises without an ...
Compare and contrast situations in war
Understanding the reasons why men fight, why they endure emotional, physical, mental torture and death in war are complex, uncertain and even thought to be unanswerable. Despite lack of a single unifying theory to explain motivation of soldiers in combat, military leaders have to find methods to motivate their men in order to achieve victory. Historians have established several methods to inquire the motivation for war. Content analysis is widely used by several historians and war psychologists to reveal the motivation of soldiers in the Second World War and the American Civil War. What is most noticeable about both wars ...
Charismatic leadership is considered as the leadership resting on the characteristics such as devotion to extraordinary sanctity, commendable character, heroism, normative orders and patterns that are designed and revealed by an individual (Miller, Vandome & McBrewster, 2010). Leaders become involve in the peculiar behaviors and thus display considerable expertise. The situations and circumstances of crisis and other realities lead to creation of an atmosphere that is favorable for the charismatic leadership emergence. The followers however react to such unexpected behaviors and actions as a member of the situations context and help in attributing charisma to leader. The charismatic traits include trust, ...
1. The admissibility of scientific evidence and expert testimony in court has been the subject of recent debate in both UK and USA. Briefly discuss the background and compare and contrast how courts in both Britain and America make sure admitted evidence is relevant and reliable.
Introduction
The courtroom, never an isolated corner of the societal landscape, has felt science’s impact. Over the years, courts have tried various methods to respond to the increasing influx of science. However, the problem of defining standards for admitting scientific expert testimony is one with a venerable history and in all likelihood, an enduring ...
Introduction
One of the most common strategies of criminal defense attorneys when representing a defendant who has an unusual condition such as a mental abnormality, is to argue either that regardless of their actions, they are nevertheless not responsible for the crime or that they never had the capacity to commit a crime. The reason that criminal defense attorneys can make these arguments is that criminal law recognizes a number of unique situations where otherwise criminal conduct should not be subjected to a determination of guilt and the offender should be exempted from the crime (LaFave, 2000). These arguments, which ...
Discussion on Various Topics
The problem relates to how marijuana should be legalized throughout the United States. There are now twenty-four U.S. jurisdictions that have enacted medical marijuana laws (MMLs), or laws that protect individuals who use marijuana upon recommendation of physicians, farmers who plant and supply the market, and doctors who issue prescription regarding use of marijuana (Smart 1). The legalization of medical marijuana will create a need for change, for example, new laws, policies, knowledge of medical and psychological effects, and education to help people understand the proper use of marijuana.
There are many issues to be resolved if legalization of ...
I believe that it is possible for an offender to reform him or herself and reenter into the society as a responsible citizen. However, this depends on the rehabilitation programs and process that he or she passes through. Giligan (2012) reveals that rehabilitation process gives an offender an opportunity to understand his or her offense thus assisting him or her to rectify such an offense and seize from doing it completely instead of punishment. Besides, it encourages the offender to take advantage of various constructive patterns that allow him or her to act according to the will of the ...
Abstract
This article will examine the validity of arrests made by police officers upon appeal of the defendants claiming that their 4th and 5th amendment rights have been violated by the police officers. This paper will present to cases decided by the US Supreme Court that will explain if the arrests made by the police officers were valid and the issues raised by the defendants in accordance to the rights under the 4th and 5th amendment. There will be a discussion on whether the ruling of the Supreme Court was justifiable. There will also a brief discussion on the exceptions ...
Critically Examine the Contribution made by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to the Development of the International Law of Genocide.
Critically Examine the Contribution Made by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to the Development of the International Law of Genocide.
At the core of the international law of genocide is the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention). The Genocide Convention came about in 1948 through General Assembly Resolution 260. It came into force in 1951. One hundred forty states ratified the Convention. Its purpose was to deter future acts of ...
Whereas the need for and application of scientific evidence has become a ubiquitous practice in most criminal justice systems, not so much attention has been paid to the potential limitations and problems associated with this type of evidence. Aspects of forensic technology such as DNA analysis have been used in the identification of the guilty and exoneration of the innocent globally for decades now. However, as the Innocence Project (n.d) notes, whereas some of these forensic technology procedures such as bite mark and shoe print comparisons were developed through thorough scientific research, many of these techniques are yet to ...
The judicial process in the United States of America has become flawed over the years. This has arisen from the fact that most of the American citizens have come out in large numbers condemning the prosecution and injustice to innocent men and women all over the country. As a result, legal scholars have had to engage with the public over issues such as racism, as well as the general degree of anti-Semitism in a bid to reduce the unlawful prosecution of innocent men and women in the United States. In this light, it is important to analyze the Leo ...
The Beatles is a band which is famous all over the world. Their songs have been favorite songs for many generations now. It seems that their songs never get old. People love them and understand them. However, “Blackbird” can be seen as one of the most interesting songs and songs that have a very deep meaning to it.
The name of the song itself speaks quite loud and direct about the meaning in it. According to the source: “McCartney explained that "bird" is British slang for girl, making "blackbird" a synonym for 'black girl'” (Reddit Web). The name of ...
While the use of scientific evidence in solving crimes has helped in the identification of criminals and the exoneration of the innocent, there are certainly a number of problems that are associated with the use of forensic technology such as DNA testing within the criminal justice system. According to Edmond (2014), the use of forensic medical and scientific evidence within the criminal justice system has in a number of occasions led to wrongful convictions and hence a miscarriage of justice due to the fact that most of them are not reliable.
The aspect of the reading from the Innocent ...
A 19-year-old high school girl was shot twice and buried while still alive in 1998 and Clayton Lockett was convicted of her murder (“Clayton Lockett” 1). After conviction, he was given the death penalty to be imposed by lethal injection and fifteen years later, his execution was botched when drug dosage was not adequate for death, finding veins for giving the drugs required multiple attempts, and the medications leaked into his muscle tissue (Connor). Witnesses to his death described it as agonizing and the response of the public again stirred the debate concerning using government sanctions to kill in ...
As an Employer, What are Your Legal Obligations Concerning Religion in the Workplace What Policies You Put in Your Employees Handbook?
Religious in the American work environment is among the most antagonistic and troublesome territories for representatives and managers to explore. In our inexorably differing and religiously pluralistic culture, the attempt will undoubtedly happen, and if The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) measurements are correct, it is occurring at a regular enlivening pace. EEOC religion-based charges of separation have expanded about 41% since 1997, and payouts have expanded around 174% (Religion-Based Charges FY 1997 - FY 2015). The risk ...
Wayne William’s case was a case that had taken the state of Atlanta Georgia by storm. At first there was no evidence that had been tied to any individual person with regards to the murders. How the murders later pointed at Wayne was really profound. In a span of two years, that is, between 1979 and 1981, approximately 28 African American youths and adolescents were found killed in Atlanta. These members of the society were all minors. These cases had something in common. For instance, there was a correlation with the way the murders were carried out and ...
Although Socrates is considered to be one of the greatest philosophers and teachers of all times, he has not left behind any written work. Much of what is known about Socrates and his philosophies come from Plato and his other contemporaries. The Trials of Socrates consists of the Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Euthyphro, clouds by Aristophanes and Xenophon's,Socrates’ defense of the Jury. These six texts reveal the nature of the trial as well as the kind of man Socrates is. Socrates is sentenced to death for having expressed doubts and not accepting the Gods recognized by the state and ...
Introduction
Human rights employment is a set of guidelines that are put in place to protect people from any form of discrimination. Human rights have a purpose that seeks to guarantee individuals equal treatment regardless of any certain identified characteristics that are normally termed as “prohibited grounds of discrimination” that in some sort of way have attracted historical bias or stereotyping in regard to employment. In any organization, employers who may include nonprofit organization have to be aware of different human rights legislation as it applies to the different practices of employments. These employment practices include recruitment advertisements, promotion, wages, ...
The Logic Behind Reevaluating Natural Life Sentences
Jennifer Lackey’s engrossing article, The Irrationality of Natural Life Sentences, is a philosophical critique of the existing judicial policy to incarcerate a convicted offender indefinitely, in light of the fact many prisoners in the United States are facing natural life sentences. A natural life sentence, while typically reserved for individuals convicted of serious crimes, is a conviction requiring the offender to spend the remainder of his or her life as a warden of the state, without any hope for parole. Within the article, Lackey tactfully argues that these types of sentences are an illogical and unnecessarily cruel form ...
Arguments to the Police Chiefs
As a prosecutor, I would argue, firstly, that immediate screening of cases just after an arrest has taken place is important in preserving evidence that the prosecution may rely on at trial to secure a conviction. Secondly, I would argue that prompt screening of cases helps the law enforcement officers and the police chiefs to ensure that there is a follow up on cases while memory is still fresh and information is available. Moreover, such screening is important in that it helps in situations where shoddy, incompetent or faulty investigations have been conducted that are not likely to enable ...
Explanation of Topic
Domestic violence is a behavioral pattern that encompasses various forms of abuse against an individual within a domestic setting. Crimes of domestic violence consist of threats and physical abuse between individuals in a social or close familial relationship, and are punishable by law (Ashworth, 2010, p. 58). Acts of abuse exist in a variety of forms that include sexual, religious, economic, emotional, verbal, and physical, and can range between marital rape, acid throwing, and female genital mutilation that may result into disfigurement and death. Various acts of domestic violence are evident in children, women, and men, with the largest ...
Criminal Liability of Joe
Joe is liable for possession, supply, and permitting premises to be used for the supply of controlled drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The law provides that it is “unlawful for a person to have a controlled drug in his possession”. Joe is a user of illegal drugs. Any controlled drugs found on his person and place of residence renders him liable for possession. When Karla overdosed, Joe was in possession of the heroin that Karla injected on herself. It is also unlawful for any individual “to supply or offer to supply a controlled drug to another”. ...
The film portrayed the central characters similarly to the book. The “Gideon’s trumpet was interesting in the sense that it was able to show the events that took place during the actual court case involving Gideon v. Wainwright. The main theme of the movie is the right of the accused to a counsel and to have legal representation during criminal trials. The character who portrayed the part of Clarence Earl Gideon was Henry Fonda (Avery 212).
The character of Gideon was an exact replica of the persona presented in the book as the man from Florida, who was ...
Scenario One: The essential elements of OUI conviction are 1) operating a vehicle, 2) on a public highway, 3) under the influence of drugs or alcohol). For Joe to be convicted under this statute, he must have been intoxicated and was “operat[ing] a vehicle.” There is no question that NH102 was a public highway for purposes of the statute. The vehicle portion of the statute is a key element to the OUI offense. The statute clearly states that a person must be operating a vehicle while intoxicated to be convicted of this crime. For purposes of the Motor ...
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Humboldt County, 542 U.S. 177 (2004)
After receiving a call reporting a fight between a man and a woman of Grass Valley Road in Nevada, a deputy sheriff was dispatched to the scene. Upon arrival, the deputy observed a pick-up truck parked on the side of the road with a woman sitting inside the truck and a man standing outside of it. The deputy approached the man and informed him that he was here to investigate a reported assault. The man denied being involved in any assault or having done anything ...
Police corruption is a huge issue that has been happening around the world. Police have contaminated and planted evidence in the past to ensure a conviction of an innocent person. This is not how police are supposed to conduct themselves, and allegations of corruption in the force are taken seriously. Over the years many offenders who were incarcerated for a crime that they had not committed have been set free, but there are many more who are still waiting for evidence to prove innocent.
Once case that has been in the national spotlight is a police corruption case that ...
Introduction
Since religion is an individual and institutional reality in the lives of most of the populace in the U.S., it is nothing unexpected that the teaching of religion gives a noteworthy connection to numerous women. This relationship of religion to women is perfectly fit to them as they address the problem of exploitation. Through writings, customs, teachings, and convention, religious groups and organizations pass on qualities and conviction frameworks to their individuals. Moreover, individuals frequently have a direct support or advising associations with religious pioneers who may give direction or guideline. Religious writings and teachings can serve as assets to help ...
When somebody is charged for criminal action, the only aim he or she has is to reduce the potential penalty. In order to minimize the risks at the trial the defendants usually choose to come to an agreement with the prosecutor. According to the definition a plea bargain is a process of negotiation between the defendant and his attorney on one side and the prosecutor on the other. In this case the defendant agrees to plead guilty or no contest to the crime. In exchange he or she may receive a reduction of the severity of the charge, dismissal of other charges ...
Business and the Legal Environment
Acme markets, Inc employed 36,000 people and operated with about 16 warehouses but in 1970 they got a letter containing details of the problems with rodent infestation. Thus, after Mr. Park got the letter, he was able to meet with the vice president and was assured that he was being investigated for the problems affecting the firm, and later correct measures would be taken. Thus after investigation was complete, it was found that the firm had some improvement in the facility but there was still infestation of rodent (Jennings, 2012). As a result of this, the firm was charged with ...
Religious experience is such an intrinsic part of Western civilization that it would be difficult to distinguish the elements of the former from the latter. One of the central tenants of the Abrahamic religions, which dominate Western civilization, is faith. While this has sustained many different meanings throughout millennia, one may hold that faith is a belief when there is insufficient evidence.
Faith is not a conviction where there is enough evidence for something or when it is self-evident. For example, one should not employ this concept in reference to gravity or other experiences that have been repeated once and ...
For example Elizabeth L. Angeli, Department of Psychology, State University.
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Sample Grant
Program.
Angeli, Department of English, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 55555
The value of alternative sentencing
“Sentencing refers to the punishment that a judge imposes upon a defendant who has either plead guilty to a charge or who was convicted following a judge or jury trial (Nocuffs.com, n.d.).”
“Sentences for a criminal conviction can take many forms, and a conviction does not always mean a trip to prison. Alternative sentences can include different combinations of the following: a suspended sentence, ...
Human behaviour is one of the most studied subjects in the world today. The complexity of human behaviour has elicited a colossal amount of research by psychologists seeking to understand some of the behavioral trends exhibited by human beings. Consequently, these psychologists have advanced several theories that explain some of the fundamental aspects of human behaviour. Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable human behaviour. Theories of behaviorism emphasize behavioral changes that result from a stimulus-response association that is made by a learner. The proponents of this theory regard all human behaviour as a sort of response to natural stimuli (Becker, 1963). The immediate ...
Habeas Corpus and the war on Terror
The main reason why this essay has been written is to find out what habeas corpus means and its application in the war on terror especially at Guantanamo Bay and its detention camps. This writ, though not normally applied in federal courts, has been consequently used several times since the declaration of war on terror in 2001. This essay first examines the meaning of habeas corpus, provides the history of the writ in the United States and its use in the unlawful detentions. Second, this essay goes through the cases of Guantanamo Bay and sets to find out whether ...
- Litigants and court indentified
Petitioner- Appellant: Cecil G. Daniels
Respondent: State of Idaho
- Legal issue
In the following case, Court of Appeals reviews petitioner`s claim to reconsider the district court`s denial of post-conviction relief. The issue in the following case is whether the assistance of the appellant counsel was ineffective and deficient (failure to challenge the denial of suppression motion) to a degree that it led to the subsequent conviction of the appellant.
- Short of description of the case.
The petitioner, Cecil G. Daniels, was charged with driving under the ...
Death by fire is a movie that is based on an American case of arson. This is after one Cameron Todd Willingham was convicted for charges of causing arson deaths to his three children. Early on during the investigations, the initial fire investigation claimed to have found several indicators that led to conclusions that it was an arson act. Due to this, the prosecutor found Willingham guilty. However, watching the video clip till the end, scientists later re-evaluated the evidence that the prosecution had relied to make the conviction. After their re-examination, the scientists were of the opinion that there ...
People, who have been recently released, often report the fact that they feel being in-between. On the one hand, they are free, while on the other, they still encounter a variety of complicated and sometimes depressive issues related to such challenging dimensions of release as reentry difficulties, inability to meet personal needs and barriers to success.
The release from prison seems to be euphoric event to those, who have never had the experience of being incarcerated. For a new releasee returning home after is a harsh experience of perceiving variety of changes both regarding the way the routine is being organized, ...
dates and time
Part of each country’s criminal justice system is to both punish and try to rehabilitate offenders, either convicted in prison or under community supervision, so they can return to the society and be integrated with it in the smoothest and most effective way. Actually, punishment and rehabilitation are part of a four-objective criminal system that also includes deterrence, which alongside punishment and rehabilitation will be further researched throughout this paper in terms of which is more effective. The aforementioned objectives will be discussed taking into consideration the effect they have on the victims and their ...