Experimenters College Essays Samples For Students

What is the relationship between the predicted outcome and the claim being tested in scientific experiment? An experimented outcome can be compromised in two ways. What are they and how do they differ?
The predicted outcome is a common aspect of science with a particular interest in scientific research studies. In science, questions about truth and the claims of certain phenomena are answered through empirical evidence. Nevertheless, there are instances where scientists make educated guesses on a particular test subject. A predicted outcome can be proved right based on measurable evidence in a hypothesis experiment. On the other hand, ...

Stanley Milgram

American scientist Stanley Milgram carried out the Milgram experiment in order to find out whether subordinates would carry out actions that are against their conscience with instructions from their superiors (Zhang et al., 2005). Milgram initiated the Milgram experiment in order to establish whether Adolf Eichmann who was in trial for war crimes in 1961, and his colleagues had common intentions when carrying out war crimes (Milgram, 1974).

The Experiment

Perry (2003) explains that the basic scenario of the experiment requires three people to participate. The volunteer assumes the role of the teacher. The remaining two assume the role of the ...

All around the world, millions of animals are put in cages and stuck with needles in order to see the effects of certain products and medications. Medical testing on animals is a controversial topic. However, most people cannot deny that testing on living animals is a moral issue that our society needs to address. In this paper, I will present reasons why medical testing on animals is immoral, show how medical testing benefits humans more than animals, and give alternative methods that can be used in the place of animals. Only by addressing the problem can we as human take the ...

Introduction

The double-blind randomized controlled trial is an experimental procedure where neither the experiments subject nor the person conducting it has any information about the unique aspects of the experiment.
A double blind randomized controlled trial aims at measuring and comparing the outcomes that presents themselves from two or more clinical interventions. A single intervention will serve as a standard to compare or as the control in the experiment. The involved participants in the experiment will receive interventions in an organized random manner so that they all have the characteristics which are similar at every start of comparing them. Randomization ...

Traditionally, animals have been assumed to respond to changes in the environment the same way as humans do. This assumption has been continuously used for product testing, research, and educating of living animals. Animal experimentation is done in a broad range of environments, including agricultural facilities, universities, hospitals and independent laboratories. This technique is used to assess the safety of the products such as cosmetics, chemicals medical services, and household products. However, animal-based testing methods have failed the human needs due to varied reactions of various animal species to these commodities. Moreover, the methodology has received severe criticism from ...

Utility and sub game perfection

Ultimatum Game is an appropriate paradigm that investigates the discord between social motives like fairness and self-interest. UG bases on the assumption that bargainers maximize their outcome. The acceptance of the smallest offer can yield high outcomes and the alternative of refusing means no outcome at all. The social utility model implies that the utility of the outcome depends on both payoffs. The study aims to identify factors that can affect the relative importance in making UG.
A strong reciprocity model in the evolution of human cooperation gains acceptance because of support and experimental findings. An observation that unfair ...

Following the American Psychological Association’s Guidelines

Each section of a peer reviewed article as a specific purpose. For example, the abstract and introduction are typically used to state the purpose of the paper and to display evidence to support the paper’s claim. In regards to the peer reviewed article about divorce’s impact on aggression in young males, the abstract and introduction perform these acts inadequately. The abstract states the procedure and results of the rest, rather than the purpose of the test. Varying evidence was stated in the abstract, but not enough to detract from the revealing results. In comparison, the introduction stated the purpose ...