Trial College Essays Samples For Students

Introduction

In the American legal system, the rights afforded to a defendant who has been accused of a crime are fundamental and of paramount constitutional concern. The Framers were cognizant of the potential for government abuse and ensured that a criminal defendant’s rights were protected. The Sixth Amendment provides that in criminal proceedings, “the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury” (U.S. Const. amend. VI). Thus, the Sixth Amendment safeguards the criminal defendant’s right to a speedy trial and guarantees that defendant is entitled to a trial by a jury ...

The trial and execution of Socrates took place in Athens and to date, it still puzzles the world. The trial remains the most significant amongst all trials. We are left wondering why an old man was convicted to death because of his philosophical teachings. The puzzle is significant since Socrates conducted his teachings in his entire adult life despite the molestations. The trial remains the most significant because it has remained difficult to locate the answers connected to the mystery of Socrates trial. The trial is complicated because of the two surviving versions of the defense or apology of ...

1. Introduction

A. Describe the issue

A juvenile is a minor or an individual who has not attained eighteen years of age. Juvenile justice is an area of criminal law that deals with people who have not reached eighteen years ("Juvenile Justice"). In essence, the laws and jurisdiction apply to minors and are evidently different from those used on people above eighteen years. In the recent past, there have been passionate debates and claims about trials on minors especially those involved in serious crimes such as first-degree murder. Many youths are tried as adults yet in the eyes of the law they are ...

Introduction

Alternate Dispute Resolution is a method of settling disputes without the intervention of the civil courts. This application of the mediation process is especially successful in conflicts of family, minor injuries, home negligence issues and most other disputes in which the settlement is relatively fixed and lowers than a jury trial would assess. There are three basic types of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR): arbitration, reconciliation and mediation . A mediator is a neutral third person who adjudicates the proceedings and is agreeable to both parties before entering into the negotiations. The parties have to additionally agree upon accepting the ...

Introduction

People commit a variety of crimes on a daily basis. Some crimes are minor incidents that do not have an extensive consequence or sentence to uphold by the offender. There are crimes that are committed that are in a higher bracket and these crimes have a more serious sentence. People often commit a crime for a number of reasons. Some crimes committed were not even done by the person who was charged in the incident. There needs to be proof or evidence that can place the alleged criminal at the crime scene when it accrued. It is important that ...

Abstract

Mini-Trial may not be totally the same as the other Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR. It holds its own characteristics of providing resolution to the disputed issue. However, some of the processes involve in the mini-trial may resemble the methods in the mediation process. In the discussion of the article about the mini-trial’s process, one can be similar to how the mediation is being done. It was stated in the article that both disputants will have the opportunity to present their own version of the case, to which they are being presented to panel in order to come ...

1. The admissibility of scientific evidence and expert testimony in court has been the subject of recent debate in both UK and USA. Briefly discuss the background and compare and contrast how courts in both Britain and America make sure admitted evidence is relevant and reliable.

Introduction

The courtroom, never an isolated corner of the societal landscape, has felt science’s impact. Over the years, courts have tried various methods to respond to the increasing influx of science. However, the problem of defining standards for admitting scientific expert testimony is one with a venerable history and in all likelihood, an enduring ...

The novel "The Trial", written by Franz Kafka, analyzes the classic problem of the modern society - the confrontation between man and bureaucratic system. The novel tells the story about Josef K. who is arrested in the morning of his 30th anniversary without being told the reason for arrest. However, Josef continues to live his life as he does it before because the organization that has arrested him is not afraid of his abscondence. He is invited to the court, is visited at home and at workplace, is pursued by servants of justice. All this time he is trying ...

Psychological testing was developed to examine the cognitive and behavioral aspects of a patient. A variety of tests have been created to evaluate the individual to determine either the diagnosis of the individual or simply to attain an assessment or evaluation of the individual. Each test discussed below can provide advantages to the forensic setting. The validity and reliability of these tests have been extensively evaluated and are discussed.
1. Mental Status Exam
The Mental Status Exam (“MSE”) is used to evaluate a patient’s mental functions and behaviors. The MSE was created as a tool for clinical psychologists ...

Introduction

The United States Constitution can be described as the highest law of the land. During court proceedings, the constitution is the supreme law that is applicable in determining the outcome of criminal litigation, but other laws arise from the Amendments to the Constitution. The United States Constitution often guides how the government should function, the jurisdiction of the presidency, American Congress, and the Supreme Court. It is, however, paramount to note that all American states have their own Constitutions that they enact and follow, but the federal constitution is considered the highest law that overrides other state laws in ...

Several accounting transactions occurred during the month of December 20X5 and were as follows:

A withdrawal was made at a value of £15,000 from the business for the personal use of the owner.
An existing retail store was purchased by the company for £150,000 on December 1.
10 desktops were purchased at a total cost of £3,500. The purpose of which is for the administrative and retail operations of the business.
10 printers totalling to £500 and miscellaneous computer accessories worth £275 were purchased. The purpose of which is to improve the purchase ordering as well as the selling operations of the business.
5 security cameras and other shop fittings ...

Part 1: Prosecutor’s Duty to Report

Although the American criminal law is based on the adversarial system where the prosecutor, representing the state, and the defense, representing the accused, engage in openly confrontational activities in order to persuade a neutral decision-maker of the truth of their story; the Supreme Court has held that under some circumstance, and despite the adversarial nature of the relationship, the prosecution must assist the defense in the preparation of their case.
The underlying reason for this counter-intuitive element of the adversarial system, is the traditional belief that the substantial power of the state, as expressed through its law enforcement and ...

Part 1

Objective: in this critical analysis, you are expected to demonstrate an understanding of public health ethics and legal issues. Also, you are required to actively engage with the subject and come up with a substantial perspective on it.

Introduction

This critical analysis will outline the main purpose of the public health ethics and legal issues for protecting and upholding public health. Public policies and social programs are some of the aspects that constitute a good public health. Also, some patients with distinct issues contribute to the wellbeing of the public health, especially in a situation of unethical event regarding health ...

Introduction

Trials for criminal cases is important to know the level of guilt or innocence of the accused person. It involves the enforcement of public codes of conduct as represented in the rule of laws as supported by the government’s prosecuting institutions or individuals. In general, the criminal case trials, there are efforts to bring criminal charges against the individual who allegedly committed a crime against another person or group of persons. However, the trial process itself is not as easy as it sounds. There are procedural steps that are normally being followed in a criminal trial, which will ...

The CSI effect is intrigued by many crime scene shows on television. These shows are based on what real crime scenes and investigators go through. They have a similar process to accessing a crime scene and locating evidence in the crime. They portray the shows to have a real life effect on the real cases and situations that investigators deal with. The increase in different versions of these shows is all over the networks. People enjoy watching the real life crime and the drama that it details. What the shows are simulating is that the crimes can be processed, ...

The judicial process in the United States of America has become flawed over the years. This has arisen from the fact that most of the American citizens have come out in large numbers condemning the prosecution and injustice to innocent men and women all over the country. As a result, legal scholars have had to engage with the public over issues such as racism, as well as the general degree of anti-Semitism in a bid to reduce the unlawful prosecution of innocent men and women in the United States. In this light, it is important to analyze the Leo ...

Rodney G. King was an African-American taxi driver who came into limelight after being beaten up by four LAPD officers on the night of 2nd March 1991. The incident sparked nation-wide unrest and communal riots leading to fifty four deaths, seven thousand arrests, several injuries and losses worth millions of dollars. “The events brought to the forefront concerns about racism and police brutality within the L.A.P.D.”
The incident took place at the night of March 2, 1991 when King was speeding his Hyundai car and was chased down by two patrol officers. He tried to dodge the cops for ...

The United States has one of the most complex and fascinating criminal justice systems in the world. The reason that the United States has such a unique criminal justice system, is that the founding fathers based their principles from superior legal frameworks around the world. For example, the founding fathers were known for looking to English, French, and other European Legal Frameworks, (The United States Constitution). Additionally, the founding fathers thought to their education of Roman Law and the laws of Ancient Greece, (The United States Constitution). For this reason, the United States has a unique array of principles ...

IN THE SUPREME COURT

BETWEEN:
CHARLES WAITROSE Appellant
and

REPUBLIC OF CANADA Respondent

APPELLANT SKELTON ARGUMENT
_________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The agreed facts of the case as it was before the trial and first appellate court were that Florence Waitrose, 8, had been suffering from an inoperable malignant brain tumor for six months. Despite receiving significant amounts of medication to help abate her pain, she continued to suffer considerably in the terminal stages of her life. All other curative treatments had ceased, and she was being nursed at home by her parents. Her father, Charles Rose, under the feeling that neither he nor his daughter could cope any longer with ...

Although the American criminal law is based on the adversarial system where the prosecutor, representing the state, and the defense, representing the accused, engage in openly confrontational activities in order to persuade a neutral decision-maker of the truth of their story; the Supreme Court has held that under some circumstance, and despite the adversarial nature of the relationship, the prosecution must assist the defense in the preparation of their case.
The underlying reason for this counter-intuitive element of the adversarial system, is the traditional belief that the substantial power of the state, as expressed through its law enforcement and ...

Laws are established in a country so as to maintain order in the community. Laws are mainly written by leaders and failure to follow the laws leads to punishment by law enforcers or the judicial department. One may wonder whether or not citizens should follow the law without any objections. The obedience and lawbreaking issues appear to be a crucial issue in the real world as people struggle with enforcing and obeying laws stipulated in various institutions or nations. Some famous philosophers such as Socrates have played a significant role in the world of philosophy. Socrates defined and considered ...

(Class Information)
Mike Tyson became a celebrity in his own right. He earned a big name in boxing, not to mention the wealth that he gained from the same sport. However, his fame waned when the front pages of the tabloids and newspapers feasted on his conviction story for allegedly raping one of the aspirants in the Miss Black America beauty contest. The Daily News read, “Mike Tyson, the world heavyweight champion at 19, last night became a convicted rapist at 25, after a jury found he attacked an 18-year-old beauty pageant contestant in his hotel room here last ...

1. Explain in detail the Exclusionary Rule.
The Exclusionary Rule is the rule that is generated by the law under the constitutional rights. It does not allow the use of any of the non-legal obtained proof in the trials for criminal under the fourth amendment. It will usually apply for the elimination of the physical evident. The best example of exclusionary rule is stolen property, murder, or weapons that allows the police to catch a break in a case under the rights of the fourth amendment. The exclusionary rule could be under the Fifth Amendment, when no person can ...

Abstract

The United States Bill of Right is scattered in several Amendments of the Constitution due to the progressive developmental history of the U.S law and Constitution. Each amendment either introduced a new right or enhanced on the existing one. Of essence to my discussion, however, is the Due Process Clause was introduced in the American Bill of Rights by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution. As per the Amendment, no state should deprive any person his or her life, liberty, or property without following the due process of the law. In the Fifth Amendment, a similar stand was ...

Essay in English Law Whether it is Unfair for Criminal Justice Insiders to Sit On Jury

Most likely, it is unfair for someone who works in the criminal justice system to be chosen to participate as jury selection-members, in the British legal system. Prior to the time of the Global Recession of 2008, one report discussed several aspects of the UK-defined protocol of what a jury-system process entails. Commentary was made regarding the UK jury system historical roots, trial-jury size, secrecy, independence, and selection (“Jury Service – Crown Prosecution”). One set of erudite Australian Professors noted that the advent of social media had fundamentally caused problems, especially during trials (Wallace et al. 2011). Consider, however, the ...

The device that necessitated the clinical trial by Thoratec Corporation, the sponsor, is the Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD). The device is meant to assist the left ventricle of the heart to perform its function of pumping blood to the aorta and onwards to vital organs of the body. The device is prescribed for patients whose hearts are not able to function optimally.
The study type employed during the clinical trial of the device was observational, non-randomized, and controlled (St. Jude Medical). It took place in a number of HM II implanting centers. The observational model incorporated prospective and ...

Introduction

The criminal justice system in the United States is complex and has a trove of advantages for the defendant in comparison to several other nations. The rights include the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent during a police interrogation. Apart from these rights, the process to find someone guilty and sentence that person is a tedious process. Unlike justice systems which rely on circumstantial evidence, the American Justice system insists on the presence of physical evidence to corroborate. In addition, a lengthy process ensures checkpoints in different areas to prevent convicting innocent people of crimes ...

Typically, when information is written by scholars, the information is transferred to the end users of the information. The end users, in this case, are the people seeking to find solutions to their research problems from the sources while the scholars are the authors of the sources. It is, therefore, prudent for scholars to take a lot of caution in their writing. They need to keep it simple and have detailed explanations with numerous examples to enable the readers or the end users of their work to have a better understanding of their work. Moreover, having a better understanding ...

The right to counsel is often considered as a right to a fair trial as enshrined in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Amendment states that it is the right of a defendant to be represented by an attorney. In case they cannot afford legal services, the government is mandated to ensure that they are represented by a legal counsel. Every defendant has the constitutional right to be represented by legal aid (Silva, 2012). The right to legal counsel was successfully pushed for by an unlikely America hero by the name Clarence Earl Gideon. He successfully ...

Steps in Criminal Jury Trial

Upon being charged with a crime, the defendant is provided with some documents including an appearance notice and promise to appear in court, summons, the information, etc. This states the charges, the offense, and then date, time and place of the opening court appearance (Walston-Dunham, 2011). In this instance, the case now proceeds to the trial phase. For a case to be complete, it has to follow through six main steps i.e. selecting a jury, opening statements, evidence presentation and cross-examination, the final remarks, jury instructions, and finally the jury verdict.
Selecting the jury - The first step begins ...

In the criminal justice system, there are different types of courts used. The two courts that will be discussed is the trial courts and the appellate courts. Even though these two courts are used in the legal system, they are not completely the same type of court procedures. The different types of cases can be heard at different levels depending on which court is needed for the case. The process of each court and the way the rulings are performed are not similar.
A trial court is where most cases start their proceedings. “In a trial court hearing, both ...

1) What is the purpose of a plea bargain?
The purpose of a plea bargain is to ensure that the defendant gets a minimum sentence if they plead guilty ("Plea bargain," 2016). At the same time, aside from it being a controversial issue, it conserves resources in the criminal justice system.
2) According to the Office of United States’ Attorneys, "When the Government has a strong case, the Government may offer the defendant a plea deal to avoid trial and perhaps reduce his exposure to a lengthier sentence."

A. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?

I agree with this statement. For the government to have a ...

Question 1: Grand Jury Review and Preliminary Hearings

According to Gaines and Miller (2016), the major difference between a grand jury review and preliminary hearings is that during the former, the prosecution presents its case before a selected jury in the absence of the defendant with the aim of determining the existence of a probable cause based on the available evidence. On the other hand, during the latter, there is no jury but instead it resembles a main trial in which the prosecution is required to demonstrate the existence of probable cause before a judge. Further, whereas grand jury preview is a mandatory procedure before trial, the ...

The administration of proper medication is essential to the treatment of a health complication. As such, medical practitioners need to enforce proper measures in the issuance of medicine to enhance the betterment of patients (Bojesen et al. 375). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of medicines through the utilization of a case study. This study will be in line with the code of conduct for Oncologists since the medical practitioner in this scenario deals with cancer patients. Since the maintenance of confidentiality is essential to the success of the medical practice, the practitioners’ and patient’ ...

The U.S criminal justice system faces a myriad of challenges, particularly within the last two decades. The prison and penitentiary population reached its optimal level and parole and probation numbers over-doubled. For instance, in 2009 seven million Americans were put under supervision either by federal or state criminal justice systems. These high numbers of offenders under supervision are an indication of the systemic failures in the criminal justice system (Robinson 31). There are two main classifications of criminal justice systems in America, the state and federal criminal justice system. These two systems play a role in identification and prosecution ...

A poor person should have legal representation during trial in order for the proceedings to comply with the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment and due process clause under the Fourteenth Amendment. Development of this idea took decades and started with providing counsel for those who do not have knowledge of the law, who are also likely to be indigent, and evolved into the appointment of legal counsel for indigent defendants in state courts.
In Powell v. Alabama, the case showed that legal representation for the poor during trial was necessary to give effect to the right of ...

Pre-trial process denotes the actions, conferences, and motions that take place afore the real court trial. They mostly take place between the prosecutors and the attorneys and can either be with/without the process of a judge or jury. Against the apprehension of many people, most cases are disposed at this stage explaining why there are plea bargaining in most cases. Conferring to Scheb & Scheb, (2011), the pre-trial process adheres to a well-laid structure, they have numerous variations depending on the sternness of the misconduct committed by the offender. The pre-trial process takes place for various reasons. For instance, they ...

The term ‘actus reus’ refers to the physical component of the crime, while ‘mens rea’ addresses the mental aspect of the offence. Situations, when the alleged perpetrator has the actus reus, but lack mens rea can be different, and a solution depends on the constituent components of a particular crime. First of all, strict liability offences and a range of other offences that differ across statutes and common law under different jurisdictions do not require proving mens rea. Strict liability often refers to minor offences (e.g., selling alcohol to an under-aged individual), where it is hard to determine the ...

ABSTRACT

Forensic psychology has grown in popularity and the assessments these professionals conduct can be incredibly beneficial in determining a criminal defendant or offender’s mental stability, ability to stand trial and the level of threat they may represent. That being said in order for forensic psychologists to provide these assessments it is required that a number of the Ethical Standards Code, which is the core structure of modern psychological practice, be augmented or adapted to allow the psychologist to be beholden to the law enforcement who hires them and not directly to the subject; they must be able to ...

According to Porter & Norton, (2007), accounting cycle refers to a series of steps that are performed in each accounting period and that climax in the preparation of some financial statements. The accounting cycle is necessitated by the time period principle of accounting that requires the preparation of financial statements on a periodic basis. In the items listed, three are steps in the accounting cycle. These are;

Post Transactions in the Ledger

The totals of various transactions are transferred from the journals to the ledger periodically. In a manual system, the frequency of posting the transactions depend on the level of activity in the business ...

A jury is a group of randomly selected adults from the community to participate in the criminal justice process as jurors. The first step is to elect members to serve as jurors for a specified time. In the selection of the jurors, the jury commissioners use a list of designated people either by voter register or any other accepted criteria and ensures that the selected people reflect the diversity inherent in the community. All people over eighteen years have an equal chance to join the Jury services (“The answer book for jury service,” n.d.). For a felony, the jury ...

The United States is a very large and complex entity filled with diverse races, cultures, ideologies, philosophies, belief systems and perspectives. That said establishing a societal structure that encourages diversity and autonomy, but also establishes standards, rules and laws that outline the nation, is no easy feat. The American criminal justice system has been praised as one of the most ethical and just in comparison with other such systems across the globe. While that may have been true many years ago, many modern thinkers and American citizens, today feel that the criminal justice system is highly flawed and is ...

International Trends in Correctional Facilities

Private correctional facilities are gaining popularity by governments in many parts of the world. A private correctional facility (prison, detention or jail) refers to a place where individuals are physically in facilities provided by a third party or a private entity through contractual agreements with the local or national government. The government pays the private entity a monthly rate or per diem per prisoner. Privatization may also refer to take over of existing public correctional or the building of new facilities by private entities. Privatization dates back to the days of the American Revolution whereby Great Britain, US colonizers, ...

Introduction

The cases below were presented in the court of law and their decisions were a foundation on which other similar cases could be based on. Law in its course is a very tough discipline more so for the individuals who have not trained well in that field. All the cases presented below addressed different types of crimes. Judges give verdict on cases by interpreting the law basing on judgements of previous cases similar to the one at hand. Two of the cases below address disorderly conduct, one entails threat communication and the other addresses the act of escaping from ...

In the case of Yakubowicz v Paramount Pictures Corp., Yakubowicz, the defendant in the case, was on his way home on the night of February 15, 1979 when he was stabbed by Michael Barret who had been at the Saxon theatre watching two consecutive screenings of “The Warriors”. The movie in question contained several scenes of juvenile-gang related violence. Additionally, Barret smuggled alcoholic beverages into the theatre where he got intoxicated. While they were parting at the subway, Barret stubbed Yakubowicz with a knife at the chest. Consequently, he died the following morning. His father brought a tortuous action ...

The arrival of the British troops in Boston in the year 1768 was a cause of much unrest between the relations of the Americans and the British. The American soldiers were just as disturbed as the American citizens, who were forced to be kept under control by the British rule. America being a British colony at the time was forced to follow the rules and regulation imposed by the British. The unrest that ensued came from the colonists and the ones who were loyal to the British Parliament. As much as the personal strife between the colonists and the ...

Everyone likes to be a hero, but being a hero is not a simple process. It is a journey of life from simple to complex; from simplicity to hardship and from ignorance to knowledge. For gaining real knowledge and enlightenment, the hero has to undergo many situations in which his physical abilities, his morals, values and principles are tried by the destiny. The hero’s hardship and ultimate success are portrayed in Western and Eastern Epics. Ramayana is one of the heroic epics in Sanskrit composed by ancient sage Valmiki. It is a story of high idealism and the ...

When somebody is charged for criminal action, the only aim he or she has is to reduce the potential penalty. In order to minimize the risks at the trial the defendants usually choose to come to an agreement with the prosecutor. According to the definition a plea bargain is a process of negotiation between the defendant and his attorney on one side and the prosecutor on the other. In this case the defendant agrees to plead guilty or no contest to the crime. In exchange he or she may receive a reduction of the severity of the charge, dismissal of other charges ...

The Cave

Plato’s The Cave is an allegorical story which Socrates was telling one of his followers Glaucon to explain to him the difference between a philosopher who seeks wisdom and others who aim to remain in ignorance. In the story, Socrates tells of a group of people who have been chained facing an empty wall their entire lives. They are unable to look anywhere, except the wall. Right behind them is an assembly line of items that are constantly going by which are reflected onto the wall by the light which comes from the fire that is behind the ...

The “Son of Sam” Case

The Nature and Type of Defenses Used
The main type of defense that was used in this case is the insanity defense. The insanity defense is a common-law excusatory defense under which a defendant in a criminal case asks the court to excuse them from criminal responsibility for their conduct. According to Math, Kumar, and Moirangthem (2015), the insanity defense rides on the assumption that at the material time, the accused person was ailing from a mental illness making them incapable of differentiating right from wrong behavior or appreciating the nature of the crime. The test for establishing the ...

Introduction

Railways for cars are a new and modern way of transporting cars from one place to the other using trains. This is one of the brightest in innovation in the history of humankind since it has helped to solve many problems that are normally associated with moving cars. Because of the availability of the above service, it is now very easy for people especially those who own personal cars to move their vehicles from one region to the other. The idea works on the principle that the cars are loaded into the train using very simple loading techniques.
This ...

Introduction

A recent report of the International Longevity Center-UK (ILC-UK) indicated that dementia can no longer be viewed as an isolated disorder due to a high prevalence of medical comorbidities, often undiagnosed, associated with it (Scrutton & Brancati, 2016). Patients with dementia also had received a less coordinated comorbidity treatments, resulting to the faster decline of their daily functioning, a reduction in their quality of life (QOL), and earlier mortality events than patients with these comorbidities, but in the absence of dementia.
The report also noted other important findings, which exacerbated the need for better therapeutic options in dealing with dementia, ...

I. The Prosecution’s Offer
The first step in making a plea offer is looking into Mario’s criminal background and the specific facts of the particular case. For instance, if Mario had and extensive criminal record including multiple DUI arrests of convictions, then the pleas offer would probably not include much of a choice other than pleading guilty and accepting a sentence of 364 days in jail, completion of a treatment program, and 2-3 years of supervised probation; or 2-3 year in prison. However, assuming that Mario does not have an extensive criminal record or DUI history; a ...

Condoms are a method of contraception used by both males and females. It acts as a barrier. A male condom constitutes a thin sheath that is usually made of latex (Alexander, 2016). On the other hand, the female condom is made of polyurethane sheath that has a flexible ring at the two ends (Edlin & Golanty, 2016). Condoms are intended for protecting people from contracting STIs during sexual intercourse. Besides, they are used as contraceptives. Condoms are grouped as class II medical devices since they exhibit the second lowest level of risk.
Various clinical studies have been conducted on various ...

In any event, a contract has implied and express terms. Express terms are easy to decipher, and they constitute the substantive part of the contract. Often, contracts impute binding obligations to the parties and violation of any term attracts liability. Implied terms of a contract operate in the underground. In an event of a claim of infringement, the court has to analyze both express and implied terms of the contract. Often, courts allocate liability depending on what term of the contract is in violation. In a practical scenario, some terms are more relevant than others. In the past, courts ...

Introduction

In recent decades, trends in diets tailored to promote weight loss have resulted in a significant increase in the intake of protein, particular in people with overweight and obesity issues. Accordingly, researchers have questioned the benefits or risks linked to the habitual consumption of “dietary protein in excess of recommended intakes” (Martin et al., 2005). In general, the primary concern has involved the possibility that diets rich in protein may increase hyperfiltration and, hence, exacerbate renal damage. Nevertheless, the potential link between protein-rich diets and renal damage has also been questioned due to an absence of adequate clinical evidence. ...

Abstract

The application of the rule of law as well as driving the use of the law towards the creation of a law abiding society is the limelight towards the creation of a society which does not condone crime and its sycophants. Enforcing law is one of the most effective mechanisms of controlling crime in any area. The use of the police as a law enforcement mechanism encourages peaceful coexistence within the society. The control of crime is usually a major step in discouraging crimes in communities. In the places where there are high cases of criminal cases reported, the ...

In this July 2013 trial, George Zimmerman stood accused of the second-degree murder of teenager Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman had shot Martin in February 2012 after a confrontation between the two in Sanford, Florida. From the beginning, Zimmerman defense team did not deny that he had shot Martin but rather that he shot Martin in self-defense (Linder, 2014).
Claiming self-defense is one of the fundamental principles of exculpation in criminal law. The theory underlying exculpation holds that in some situations although a person has otherwise acted criminally, their actions are justified and therefore should not be subject to punishment. In ...

John Proctor is one of the main figures in the play “The Crucible”. The author of this play is Arthur Miller. The character of John Proctor is one of the major personalities which are described in the play. He happens to be one of the reasons why the witch trial begins. The character of John Proctor goes from a much respected man to a man who falls from grace and becomes a sinner.
John Proctor wants to get back the time and pretend like the adultery situation did not happen at all. He says: “Abby, I may think of ...

The “exclusionary rule” is one of the most important elements of United States criminal procedure law, but it is not found in the Constitution. Indeed, the exclusionary rule is a court created procedure that allows a judge to declare inadmissible any testimony or evidence presented at trial that was result of or otherwise obtained in violation of the Bill of Rights’ Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments. In other words, while the basis of the exclusionary rule is the Constitution, it is not a constitutional right. Rather the exclusionary rule was created as a means for the court to prevent ...