Waiver College Essays Samples For Students

The Supreme Court case Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966) raised a number of important issues regarding the treatment of juveniles in the criminal justice system. The facts are as follows. The defendant, Morris A. Kent, Jr. was arrested for breaking into a woman’s apartment, stealing her wallet, and raping her (Kent v. United States, 1966, p. 543). He was 16 years old at the time he committed these offenses and, because of his age, was subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court (Kent v. United States, 1966, p. 543). Kent was subsequently taken ...

Juvenile Justice Transfer Process

Juvenile justice is a justice system that was made to protect delinquent offenders it is a system that act as a shield to offenders below the majority age from the criminal system. The establishment of juvenile justice system dates back 1868, it was meant to protect children from the adult way of justice (Taxman, 2014). The main aim of forming the juvenile justice was to encourage the rehabilitation on the basis of the child needs (Robinson, 2014). The system separates young criminals below the age of 17 years from adult criminals. Formation of the system was under the belief that if young ...

Q.1
The legal issues are part of the business in the modern times, and the companies have to demonstrate greater level and degree of care in order to preserve their stake in the deal. The larger corporate players in the business world often trick the smaller ones into entering a bad deal so the Little Oil Company (LOL) seriously qualifies as smaller company in the featured transaction. The Big Tex Oil Company (BTOC) has to help the formerly mentioned organization in order to make the intended and planned project into a corporate success of historical nature.
However, the confidentiality ...

Miranda Rights

The decision of the Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona that a confession obtained through interrogation while in custody, and at which time the suspect was not informed of his/her constitution to have a legal representative present would be inadmissible in the court of law. However, only the accused can proclaim their constitution protection in contesting the involuntarily obtained confession. These Miranda rights, as they are popularly known, are necessary in the course of justice as they guarantee the constitutionality of the Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and Fourteen Amendment. Fifth Amendment deals with self incrimination, Sixth Amendment relates to right to ...

Section

The Bidding
Charterparty invited tenders for the construction of a new cruise-liner, to be called the Ocean Carpathia. Donelly was invited to tender. However, the person responsible for receiving tenders left work early.

ISSUE: WON Donelly Brothers can compel recognition of its bid? HELD: Yes

DISCUSSION: Similar to the case of Blackpool v Blackpool, it is the duty of the entity requesting for bids to inspect all those which have been submitted. In the case at bar, MC Donelly was actually able to submit its bid on time. It is not the fault of the bidder that their documents were not received in time, as it was the responsibility of the ...

NY Bar Examiner

New York, NY 10001.
Dear Madam/Sir.
I am an applicant for the Bar Exam that is coming up. I have already filed my candidature papers for the same. I understand from the Exam Requirements that an Official Transcript needs to be sent to the Bar Board in order for a candidate to be allowed to take an exam. It seems that this requirement is absolutely mandatory and a waiver for the same can only be granted by the Bar Examiner. It is for this reason that I am writing this letter, which also supports the earlier petition that I ...

Head size and intelligence: A correlational study

ABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between head size and intelligence. A cross-sectional research design was used in the study. Twenty (20) respondents with ages from 12-18 years were purposively selected. Ages, head circumferences and IQ scores were obtained from each of the respondents. One way ANOVA revealed a no significant difference among the respondents in reference to their ages, head sizes and intelligence (p < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed a no significant relationship between the respondents’ head circumferences and IQ scores (R2 = 0.002). Thus, this study concluded that having large head size doesn’t account for one’s ...

This document is the risk analysis plan of American Military University Arena located in Charleston, West Virginia. The arena can accommodate 65000 people and is utilized as a multipurpose facility to host events in college and professional basketball, football and hockey matches. The objective of this document is to analyze various possibilities of risk which may occur and cause hindrances in arena usage, threat to audiences and players or performers, result in any serious damages, etc. In this document, the information provided will include: services provided, clients served, person responsible for risk management, roles and responsibilities, stakeholders of facility, details ...

The right to counsel is a fundamental right provided by the Sixth Amendment to ensure a fair trial of the accused. The Sixth Amendment states that accused shall enjoy inter alia the rights of the assistance of a counsel for his or her defense. For several years in the United States of America, this right only applied to capital offenders accused by the Federal Government and not the States. It was until the year 1963 that this position was changed in the celebrated case of Gideon v. Wainwright. This case was heard up to the Supreme Court at Florida which reversed the ...

LS 301 7

Question 1
Berghuis vs. Thompkins, 560 United States of 2010 (docket 08-1470), refer to a verdict by the U.S. Supreme Court where the jury favored a suspect who recognizes his or her right to stay put under Miranda vs. Arizona. The ruling also recognized people, who recognized their right to remain hushed, but does not openly waive or invoke the right (Thomas, 2012). The Supreme Court affirmed that unless the person in custody stated that he or she was depending on the right, his or her following voluntary statements might be used in a court of law and police could go ...

In criminal law, the right to remain silent was first established in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), as a constitutional right. Miranda laid the groundwork for many cases (Leo 621), but Berghuis v. Thompkins 560 U.S. 370 (2010), is arguably the most important case related to Miranda in recent history. In Berghuis, new precedent was set for determining whether a waiver of the right to remain silent must be expressly implied.
In Berghuis, a man named Thompkins was arrested and interrogated after a shooting in Southfield, Michigan, in which one victim died. Thompkins was given a piece ...

A defendant is innocent until proven guilty. The structure of the legal system and process in the United States is to place the burden of proof on the government. The government carries this burden of proof as to every element of the crime the defendant is charged with. In order for a criminal defendant to be found guilty, the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (In re Winship, 1970, p. 361). The reason for this high burden of proof is to guard against government abuse. Were the government not bound by any constraints, the respective positions of ...

According to the case presented in this case scenario, there is avoidance of legal requirement to have redemption. Clara has presented her current year’s tax returns and it seems there are some unusually abnormally in her tax return. She reported a large capital gain in her stock redemption in 2011. This was due to an irregularity made during the redemption process. Clara did not avail herself during the family during the redemption process. This affected the whole process of exchange treatment, where she was supposed to avail herself for a completion of the termination. The analysis of the returns reveals ...

INTRODUCTION

The concept of federal sovereign immunity is anchored on the sovereign immunity doctrine. This doctrine provides that the federal government cannot be sued unless it has given explicit permission to be sued. The concept, whether applying to the state or federal government, has been assailed for its contradicting tension with constitutionalism - a legal principle that exists to limit governmental powers vis-à-vis fundamental rights of individuals (Sisk 74). Jackson (2003), thus, noted that the concept is a “place of contest between the values of Constitutionalism” with limiting governmental powers, on one hand, and judicial hesitance brought about by commitment to ...

Miranda v. Arizona (1966) was a landmark case that led to the protections afforded suspects against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment of the constitution being clearly spelt out and extended. Though this right had constitutional protection beforehand, the Warren court held that while confessions made while in police custody may be superficially voluntary, the environment in such a scenario may, in fact, compel a suspect to confess. The Court held that "the modern practice of in-custody interrogation is psychologically rather than physically oriented" and that "the blood of the accused is not the only hallmark of an unconstitutional inquisition (Miranda, 1966). The ...

After the American colonies won their independence from the British, the thirteen colonies became the current thirteen states on America. These states have formed a league that enables them to work together in harmony. The Article of Confederation was a document that described their system of government, where the state governments had most of the power than the national/federal government. However, this contradicted the government under the King that placed the national/federal government above the state governments. The constitution was written in order to replace the Article of confederation, which the founding fathers thought to leave the nation too weak. The ...

The Adjudication Process in Juvenile Justice System

Juvenile Justice System
A person under the legal age of 18 (in most state) who committed an action against the prevailing state laws is considered a juvenile. A network of government agencies that are tasked to deal with juvenile misconduct is called a juvenile justice system. They consist of Department of justice, juvenile corrections, probation, police, prosecutor, court and detention (The3rdjudicialdistrict.com N.D). In a common court, the convicted criminal’s social status is also being considered especially if the convict is a minor, the existing law that protects women and children will prevent a juvenile from being sent over to an adult correctional ...

My name is and I was born on the 23rd of December, 1988 in Keelung, Taiwan. My parents were and . I have one older brother who works as a firefighter for the FDNY. He also was part of EMT (FDNY) for 3 years. My family immigrated to the United States in 1994. Our only support here was my uncle . He is the only one from our family who speaks English. We moved to the United States because my parents wanted me and my brother to have a good education and have a better job. It was really hard for ...

Medicaid is one of the major funding agencies for healthcare in the US which delivers health coverage to people with low incomes (Medicaid, n.d.). The Medicaid program was redesigned as per the instructions of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo on January 5, 2011 to address the deficit of budget (Department of Health, n.d.-b). A team was crafted in order to redesign the Medicaid program by the governor with the objective of developing a budget proposal for the first year and develop a reform plan. The key stakeholders of Medicaid were engaged to figure out the possible changes in the way ...

Introduction

The issues of whether or not to treat juveniles or minors the same ways as adults when they commit a crime is a delicate one and has been debated for decades. Many authoritative figures believe they should be treated in a similar manner. However, there are many researchers that feel differently, believing that charging a child with what many consider an “adult crime” could affect the rest of their life and leave them with no hope of redemption. When making such a life-changing decision a judge or jury should already understand the social, biological, and psychological factors that differ ...

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)—Title 9, US Code, Section 1-14—was first enacted on February 12, 1925. FAA underwent a few developments through the years. It was codified on July 30, 1947 (61 Stat. 669). It was amended September 3, 1954 (68 Stat. 1233); added Chapter 2 on July 31, 1970 (84 Stat. 692); added two new Sections in October of 1988; renumbered on December 1, 1990 (PLs669 and 702); added Chapter 3 on August 15, 1990 (PL 101-369); and, added Section 10 on November 15, 1990.
The FAA provides the guideline for the enforcement of arbitration agreements ...

Lawmakers in United States of America brought a bill in their federal government whose aim was to ban the junk food’s purchases using funds from Supplemental Nutrition Assistant Program, NSAP. The bill raised many issues among the members calling for a mass debate. Some members opposed the bill while others supported it. The bill on one side directed Human Services and Health Department to seek from the government, a waiver that would ban the purchase of junk food while on the other hand; low-income individuals were provided with financial incentives to help them purchase more vegetables and fresh ...

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) was formed by congress in 1996 to curb the growth of needy families. However, not all families, and children were eligible to access the funding of TANF due to restrictions on different levels governing the funds. One such level is the distribution of the fund, or block grant to each state basing in its need. However, each state is entitled to set its own restrictions, there are several rules regarding TANF from the federal government.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), is determined by the time limit for families and children receiving support. ...

Citizenship and Instruction Program

Experience and Community Need
BronxWorks, is a settlement house and multi-service organization with proven track record of leading immigration services since 1998. That year we first collaborated with SEEDCO to launch a series of initiatives that target low-income immigrants with limited English language proficiency. Our organization leveraged resources to provide English as a Second Language (ESL) services and civics classes from the New York City Department of Youth and Community Development (DYCD) to more than 250 participants in 2015 and over 600 participants since its inception. For over 18 years, we have provided citizenship and ESL instruction to New ...

The Pinellas County administration has long enjoyed multiple regimes of administrative and political stability because of exceptional professionalism from public officials. None of its commissions has failed a bid for re-election since 1992. This situation follows that the county’s employees receive excellent treatment and enjoy lasting careers. Nonetheless, recent times have seen the officials engaged in a land scandal involving the appraiser, the county administrator, board of commissioners, and the Attorney (Menzel, 2009).
In the events following the scandal, the County Attorney was aware that her actions in the land case would appear biased against the County government. ...

Intersectionality of sexuality and poor immigrant women

Intersectionality of sexuality and poor immigrant women
Basically, intersectionality refers to the study of intersections between systems or forms of domination, discrimination or oppression. While race, class and power intersection constitute the major structural elements of many Latina and black women experience in shelters of battering, it is worth noting that sexuality intersection exist in other sites. For the poor immigrant women, their condition of being immigrants can put them in a vulnerable status that are coercive, though not reducible to the economic class easily (Lockhart & Danis, 2010). For instance, according to the immigration Act of 1986, someone who ...

The environment is under different types of threats. Environmental pollution has been a key issue of concern in the last two centuries. The sustainability of human activities is something that the government has tried to look at in a detailed manner. Air pollution has been one of the most dangerous pollution in the environment. The human activities have contributed much to air pollution. The impacts of air pollution in the environment are massive and hazardous especially to the future generation the human activities especially industrial emission and automotive emission has been the main source of air pollution (Ackerman and William 1468). ...

Introduction

Time has seen radical changes in the court system. Earlier it was all about conviction for a given crime. Victims of addiction were just apprehended, put behind bars where it would do worse to them as they would silently suffer withdrawal (Chrobo, 348). However, this model that describes sovereign power has changed and paved way for disciplinary power, a model characterized by set procedures and curriculum under strict disciplinary measures. The Drug Treatment Courts are one such example.
Drug treatment courts are mandated to deal with persons convicted of non-violent crimes in which the eventuality would be a custodial sentence (Foucalt, ...

Ladson Billings (2006) observes that achievement gap is one of the hot topics in American education system that lead to disparity between White and foreign students. The education debt continues to accumulate in economic, sociopolitical, and historical component. Ladson Billings (2006) compares the education debt to the national debt that contrasts to the national budget deficit. The education research focuses on the impoverished in America that represent an increasing number in the nation. The education researchers pursue inquiry from the foreign students while they rarely provide the solution to the problems. The prevalence of the achievement gap appears in ...

Introduction

The California Dream Act enables illegal immigrants who have graduated from high school a Cal-grant aid. They are also entitled to a permit of residence for 6 years. The Carl-grant is divided into two, A and B. Section A considers the grade point average (GPA) and financial necessity. B depends on GPA, the highest level of education of the applicant’s parents and marital status. Legal citizens have difficulty times applying and getting financial help. Allowing illegal immigrants to the aid on simple requirement is amnesty of the highest level. It heightens unfairness compared to applicants who are U.S citizens. It ...