For a country to run smoothly the issues emanating from the congress, parties and state authorities should go hand in hand in making sure the constitution is followed to the later. This paper addresses issues to do with congressional ethics, third party candidates and their impact on the overall governing rule.it will also look at the role of Federal and State authority in the education sector.
Congressional Ethics
Roy Moore, Alabama’s idealistic chief justice, is a member of Congress who faced elimination from the bench, for being indicted on six counts of violating judicial ethics. Moore’s order monitored a multifaceted legal conflict over marriage equivalence in Alabama. The federal district court collided with Alabama’s sanctions on same-sex marriages in February 2015 but continued its ruling while U.S. Supreme Court deliberated on the issue. The Alabama Supreme Court maintained the marriage embargoes in a clear case and ordered the validation judges in the state to conform to them.
The reason for the charges was because Moore intervened through his administrative role as the state’s chief justice and commanded the validation judges to implement the marriage interdicts on January 6. Moore defended the order as an effort to culminate misperception and vagueness among the probate judges. But since the constituency law court had by then struck down the sanctions, Moore’s command amounted to a deed of insolence in ambiguity with the federal judiciary.
I do agree with the verdict since Moore’s conduct is considered as defying the federal judges, and it is deliberated as violating Alabama’s judicial ethics principle. Every person has got equal rights when it comes to expression. The LGBT community has rights just like any other heterosexual individual.
In as much as the members of Congress do have powers to institute laws, it is not morally right to interfere with the rights of others in trying to exercise power. This, therefore, kills my trust of most congress members.
Third Party Candidates
Though some contenders have recurrently supposed that they want more choices than just those presented by the Republicans and Democrats, the Constitution fundamentally brands third parties unrealistic. There has been no recorded time when a member of the third party won the elections. This is attributed to two main reasons. First, the extension of the federal government tends to smother out third parties that were initially dynamic at the state and local level. As national anxieties increasingly control elections, voters are less motivated to back parties that only have an original focus. At the same time, the major parties- the representative and popular work tirelessly to designate third party issues and sway their followers into their affiliation.
Second, engagements have taken when one party leads the parliament are repeatedly uncompleted comparatively indeed when the new party gets control, as it unavoidably does. In the United States, that is much tougher. The establishing forebears require legislation to be relatively problematic to endorse and similarly difficult to change once ordained. That explains why we there are two houses of the administration with different expressions, dealings and election rules, and a head of state who may or may not be of the party guiding either house of Congress.
In the event a candidate from third party wins, the state would have no trust on the Republican and Democratic Party. Third parties have either been automobiles for prominent individuals with severe conceptual interests such as the Libertarian and Green parties. The major influence of these ideological parties, though, is to gutter votes away from the first side adjoining to their position. Green Party votes arise at the expense of Democrats, and those of the Libertarian Party primarily emanate from the Republicans.
Federal and State Authority
One main issue fronting the United States today is education. Standards and worth of education vary broadly from state to state, cities, and even districts. Nevertheless, federal and state government still play some role in the education policy. The central authority has set federal laws with the utmost influence on education policy, equal entrance to education and maintaining students' and teachers' legitimate rights.
The federal government likewise impacts education by allotting funding merely to those school districts that follow specific general strategies. Most of this money serves toward support agendas for children with incapacities. The rest of the funds is disseminated to school districts that show satisfactory yearly progress.
Finally, federal supports like the National Science Foundation and the Department of Education circulate suggested teaching approaches and materials, which are helpful in covering the set curriculum.
Every state's constitution necessitates it to offer a class organization where children may obtain an education. Many state compositions also encompass definite necessities for generating educational curricula. Some state laws authorize state establishments to hand-pick textbooks and educational resources. In addition to constitutional power, state governments also have the right to establish in this area, or they can allow officials to launch, select, and legalize curriculum. State legislatures have also set compulsory necessities for scholars to graduate. They suggest a model curriculum agenda, permitting local authorities to advance their curricula grounded in the universal state goals.
The U.S constitution offers no restrictions to the state and federal response to the education issue. This is because one manifesto of the constitution is to improve the education sector.
References
Deva, S. (2009). Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business. New York: Prentice Hill.
West Brighnton (2009). West Americas Government. New York: St. Paul : West Pub. Co.
Jameson, W. (2006). The State Government Functionality. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Jansson, B. S. (2009). The Reluctant Welfare State. Australia: Cole Press.
Leewars, M. (2014). Federal and State Governments. India: Cham Springer Press.
Rosenstone, S. (1996). Third parties in America : citizen response to major party failure Princeton. New York: Princeton Univ. Press.
