Question 1
Trans/cross/dis-programming is defined by Bernard as the act of merging differences into one where function does not follow form, and vice versa. He proposes the displacement and mutual contamination of terms where a church can be changed into a club and railway stations becoming museums (Tschumi 5). This tries to elaborate the deviation from the traditional norms and the normal cultures.
Question 2
In the event the writer defines architecture as the design of condition to dislocate tradition and regressive aspects of society to implement the desired change or differences. I think the aspect of events and thought is quite relevant to the modern society in that it brings an image of visual thinking and imaginations. The desire of imaginary events that might be happening in space and contemporary society may be used to design an event.
It is of importance in the modern society in that, it brings the contextual combination of image and action, image and its use, image and the structure in demand. This idea can be used as a channel of programming events in the contemporary society where need should meet the design. The idea is also of great importance in the society for it allows, the planning of an event in a chronological order.
Thinking has become a crucial part of the society today, it create visionary actions and boosts creativity and innovativeness among the individuals. This in turn results in masterpieces of every art in the architecture department. Technology has met desire in the current society as the result of combining events and thought. The current trend in technology and communication designs are definitely out of the event-thought correlation in the society today. Bernard's model of argument has a big role in the contextual modern society architecture (Tschumi 7).
Work cited
Tschumi, Bernard. Architecture and Disjunction. Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.: MIT Press, 1999. Print.
