Argument Revisit: Free Sample Essay To Follow

(P) Everything existent was created.
(P) Everything that can’t create itself must have a creator.
(P) Humans are existent and cannot create themselves.
(C) Humans have a creator who is God.
All that exists was created. In order to exist, something has to come into existence. The act of coming into existence is known as creation. This means that all existent must have been created. Obviously, there can be two sources of creation – inside and outside. If something cannot create itself then, to come into being it has to be created by something or someone else, i.e. have a creator. The bottles cannot create themselves; they are created by humans, and so, we are the creators of the bottles. Humans exist and cannot create themselves. As it can be found, no human has ever been created either by himself; humans can only be found to reproduce themselves. This means that humans cannot create themselves, and so they have a creator. This creator is God.
As I can recall there are no logical fallacies in the argument, so it is at least valid. The only slight exception is premise 3 which can be thought to have an argument from ignorance fallacy. However, I do not think that this impairs the strength of this premise since the claim it makes is rather obvious. As for the cognitive biases, everything might be a bit more complex. As I have not reviewed all the arguments and discussions regarding the third premise, given the totality of modern physical as well as esoteric information on the subject, there can be some confirmation cognitive bias hidden in this premise. However, I do not think that this bias even if present affects the soundness of the arguments significantly.