Argumentative Essay On Smoking In Public Places

Arguably, many countries in the globe have laws that regulate or prohibit smoking in various places. As a matter of fact, smoking affects both smokers and non-smokers. The two types of smokers that is the active and passive smokers faces tremendous consequences, but the differences arise in the sense that an active smoker makes the choice to smoke while a passive smoker is just a victim of smoking by inhaling the smoke. Nonsmokers and smokers meet in various public places such as hotels, restaurants, busses, offices, as well as various institutions and each one should enjoy their life whatever. Smokers have the freedom to smoke, but they should not be allowed to smoke in public places. In general perspective, smoking in public places should be banned because it causes health problems, pollutes the environment, as well as violating non smokers’ rights.
Smoking in public places should be banned because it causes health risks to those individuals who have decided not to smoke. It is evident that those who smoke suffer various health problems; nevertheless, non smokers are affected by the second hand smoke, which exposes them to health risks. In this case, the non smokers should be protected through the banning of smoking in public places. Many people in the world today die because of smoking-related illnesses. Smoking in public places causes a higher percentage of lung cancer and other body organs. In addition, second-hand smoke increases the risk of non-smokers of suffering from heart disease. It is ascertained that pregnant women suffer from smoking and second hand smoke in various ways namely, miscarriage, stillbirth, and premature birth. Based on the health problems caused by smoking in public places, it is evident that smoking in public places increases the cost of health care. Therefore, the best solution to these health problems is to ban smoking in public places.
Smoking in public places pollutes the environment exposing the public to various risks. The smoke that is released into the air has very many hazardous chemicals. In this case, the second hand smoke is very risk to the individuals who do not smoke. Individuals who continuously inhale the smoke fumes that are in the air are prone to diseases as compared to active smokers. I have three young boys, and I do not like them inhaling second hand smoke; hence, smoking in public places should be banned. Apart from exposing the non smokers to diseases, smoking in public places pollutes the land, as well as the water that we drink. Smoking in public places should be banned because it pollutes the environment, leading to water, land and air pollution.
Undeniably, smoking in public places breaks the rights of other people. In most cases, smokers believe that they have the rights to smoke. Actually, this is true, but smokers do not have the right to smoke in public places because they will be breaking other peoples' rights. I work in a fast food restaurant, and I always find it very rude and against peoples' rights to smoke in the drive thru. The smoke blows into the face of the workers and into the restaurant making the customers uncomfortable. Additionally, children are also exposed to smoking behaviors because they see other smoking in public places. I believe smoking in public places should be banned because the rights of non-smokers are violated though inhaling of second hand smoke.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Smoking in public places causes health problems, pollutes the environment, and violates the rights of non-smokers. The responsible stakeholders should put into consideration the effects of second hand smoke on non-smokers and completely ban smoking in public places. The general public also should be made aware of the impacts of secondhand smoke, especially on their health.