Shirlee Byrd’s definition of science involves thinking about science is in comprehensive conceivable terms. She adds that pure science is implemented by somebody with interest of human life who is not looking only for a solution but possibly supplement for more questions. Shirlee appears to explain science in terms of those who practice it. She also comments and notes that a researcher should be an inquisitive person with inborn perpetual curiosity.
Definitively, I would say that in the light of the importance of Science and Technology in the contemporary world, it is better to gain some insight into what this is all about. Basically, Science has the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake as its major goal. Oppositely, technology aims at coming up with new and creative methods and products that improve human life and experiences. Or, in other words, Science is the pure knowledge while Technology is the applied scientific knowledge.
Comparatively I would agree with Shirlee Byrd’s definition of science since science and technology is concerned with the innovation and discovery of new systems through research. I would say Science tries to theorize the cause of events, while technology theorizes about novel procedures and products. Understanding natural phenomena is a major motivation aspect for Science while Technology aids in interpreting the environment and understanding how best to make it better.
In comparison with Shirlee Byrd’s definition of science, modern Science, which has been characterized by the heavy documentation and details of facts and procedures, has been a major topic among the people of the western world for several decades now. There is no hope of doing perfect research thus Science will continually question and theorize scientific research conductions.
References
Markert, L. R., & Backer, P. R. (2010). Contemporary technology: Innovations, issues, and perspectives. Tinley Park, Ill: The Goodheart-Willcox Company.
