My perspective
Conflicts between moral norms and public health goals are indeed commonplace and often hard to avoid. The disparities between the goals of public health and the societal expectations often times collide leading to medical dilemmas amongst medics. Evidence of such conflicts is portrayed by the existence of bioethics discipline through which medics mediate moral dilemmas in the course of their practice.
Post one
A suitable illustration of the conflict described above is the phenomenon of diverse cultural set ups within a nation and the preference of a universal national code for public health practices. Some societies hold dear their moral ideals and are often unwilling to compromise them even during encounters with public health concerns. The effort by governments to provide desirable standards within communities such as sanitation, water and pest control usually are met with opposition from these cultural ideals occasioning the conflict discussed above.
Post two
A sample case of these conflicts is the existence of international health standards by various international bodies such as World Health Organisation (WHO) that conflict with the local standards of health of various nations. The result is an incoherence that occasions medical dilemma among the medics. Also, the phenomenon of medics who emerge from conservative societies is a contributor to the chances such conflicts as they choose between keeping up with professional requirements and keeping with their societal norms.
Post three
The best example of such conflicts is in the circumcision of males in most African states and indeed even in some white states. According to the WHO, circumcision in males promotes hygiene. Also, the practice is thought to minimize chances of contracting HIV/AIDS and other STIs. However, several societies render the practice inconsistent with their morals and thus do not observe it. This creates dilemma amongst medics who are employed to ensure compliance in such areas.
