This article talks about various criticism of a television series “The Race to Address in Orange is the New Black.” In this article, the author seems to argue that many people have written literary criticism against this TV series without necessarily watching of the episodes. He has pointed out that critics tend project various views against the characters in the series without conclusively learning their roles.
In this article, the author seem to hold that constructive criticism of the series should acknowledge the way the series has the concept of racial dynamism and has settled to what was displayed. Largely, the author’s concern is critical in analyzing the theme of the series. To learn the theme of the series, one has to view all the episodes in order to identify the thematic concerns of each episode. Arguably, one episode may be pushing for a given theme, but the next may project a dissimilar view.
Thus, in the article, the concept of racial representation has been a focus of criticism yet the last episodes of the series constructively represented the racial dimensions. Moreover, the author seems to reject the positions peddled by critics about the series. In the author’s view, the series was successful in presenting a powerful theme, which many critics have ignored because of criticizing the series without watching all episodes of the series. In the author’s view, therefore, the critics’ arguments are baseless, as they do not rely on information that can guide objective reasoning. This argument is poignant because it illustrates the failure of the critics. In conclusion, the article seems to reject criticisms made about the series by critics that did not watch all the episodes. Their criticisms are half-baked.
