Probabation is primarily a result of an offense where mostly a detailed action is required and is closed and managed through the involvement of larger number of individuals and detailed closures. It is very effective and immediately reaching the offender and providing the results. Normal, civil violations are a common example where the local police can arrange for proper judgments.
Parole
Parole on the other had is highly systematic as compared to the above, however involves a set function of the management where the decision making is done through carefully selected judges and provides the offender a strong result through detailed hearing process and may take a little time however is effective in providing the right results.
Immediate Sanction
Immediate sanction is a basic type of judgment where a quick result is required and is taken care off immediately with the help of politically located autonomous judges and the expectation is only to provide a quick result to the offender and is mostly done in cases including minor violations.
The Parole proves to be the best way out here as it provides a proper function of the management and also includes a proper procedure where the judgment is based on selected teams and also provides an opportunity to decide the adequate steps that must be taken in order to deal with a particular violation. The process in this, is neither very quick and nor too late and provides a quality judgment due to which it is the best as an actual correctional strategy.
If we talk about the ethical points related to the same, it is important to understand that in the case of immediate sanctions it may be difficult to gather a proper evidence against the offender and also the selection of judges is random and autonomous which may not provide enough grounds to enable the offender provide proofs in his defense.
Works Cited
Probabation and Parole Bureau. (n.d.). PROBATION AND PAROLE BUREAU. Retrieved July 9, 2012, from cor.mt.gov: http://www.cor.mt.gov/content/CommCor/Procedures/140_5interventionhearings.pdf
Tonry, M. (2007). Intermediate Sanctions in Sentencing Guidelines. Washington, D.C.: NCJ 165043.
