The main idea from this reading is the idea of what will work in the post corrections environment and what works best to change offender behavior toward this end . The study hypotheses are whether the current post incarceration programs have a chance of reducing the recidivism rates in the future. The methods are used to test the study hypothesis is a literature review of the various types of research that was available at the time of the article and its effectiveness if available. For reentry programs, the aftercare stage speaks to an essential point in the wrongdoer's backslide aversion. Detainees might start their reentry prepare exceptionally hopeful and with great expectations. With proper administration conveyance they might discover reentry manageable and be entirely effective in the early days and months.
Nonetheless, as the day by day stressors and dissatisfactions of completely acclimatizing once more into neighborhoods, families, furthermore, work environments are understood, the customer might discover it increasingly hard to keep up a professional social way of life. A very much outlined reentry project ought not just help guilty parties in aptitude development and without a formal and organized project set up that expands upon prior treatment conventions, guilty parties might backslide when the administrations and social backing decrease.
Yes the authors provided a fairly good review. The article is older and does not include some of the more recent attempts at acclimation and post incarceration attempts. The article gives way to the notion that more research needs to be done. The author also supports the belief that more parole officers with a smaller case load can be an effective instrument in fighting recidivism.
References
Listwan, S. (2006). How to Prevent Prisoner RE-Entry Programs from Failing. Federal Probation, file:///C:/Users/Kingston%20University/Downloads/Listwan%20etal_2006_PEI%20applied%20to%20reentry-11%20(1).pdf.
