Introduction
With the onset of technological changes, globalization and a radical development within the world of academia, political systems have suffered radical changes in the wake of advancement. In the long run, scholars of political science and philosophy have been left pondering with the concerns and questions resonating around new governance ideals and models. This paper critically puts into perspective one of the views from the academics.
Summary
Critique
The approach assumed by the author is revealing and inquisitor in nature. He puts into perspective the jurisprudence that has been established by political systems in governance. One gets along with his observations which are predicated on the overlapping roles of governance and political philosophy towards the overall achievement of governance objectives. In the long run, the reality downs on us that governance is intended for society to achieve order and stability. This brings into forth interrogation of the system of governance and its contribution towards the overall achievement of the goals. It is my contention that governance needs to be approached liberally in the quest for alternatives to achieving the societal objectives.
Conclusion
The nature of governance that is hinged on liberal political philosophy should be evolving and accommodative of new developments in the modern context. It should, therefore, provide the solution to questions of governance and its role in society.
Questions
These raises questions on the essence of liberalism and its place in governance. One needs to ask whether in the long run, a liberal system that is embracive of change would be the solution that addresses arising issues such as the author’s.
References
Rose, N. (2008). Governing "Advanced" Liberal Democracies. In N. Rose , & P. Miller, Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life (pp. 32-64). New York: Polity.
