Introduction
The introductory section of the paper clearly presents what the author was trying to convey. The author posited that oversights in nursing care can produce negative impacts. There was not enough research to show the factors why nursing care was omitted. The absence of appropriate and adequate literary support on the subject, the problem statement was ambiguous. There were no methods stated in the initial paragraph. Rather, the methods were mentioned in the other section of the paper. There was also no mentioning of the research tradition utilized; hence, no assumptions can be rendered concerning the research problem.
Two research questions were clearly identified – what form of nursing care is missed out and the reasons for being unable to provide nursing care. These two inquiries seem, by all accounts, to be predictable with the study's subject. The questions offer knowledge to the reasons why nursing care is not rendered.
In the introductory section of the paper, the author expresses that earlier research examines have demonstrated that diminished staffing can bring about an expansion in hindering results for patients. Real themes in the audit are identified with staffing, nourishing danger/lack of healthy sustenance, advantages of ambulation, and issues after release. The articles, for the most part, begin in the nursing journal as well as other essential sources. There is by all accounts a full collection of subjects inspected making a solid structure for this study. A hole in examination has been recognized in the region of missed nursing care, which demonstrates a requirement for more research around there. The key ideas of the study are conclusively identifiable for the reader. The author makes it clear that we are going to investigate and analyze this idea and furthermore, recognize why medical attendants fail to render care.
Protection of Human Participants
The techniques are obviously recognized in this segment. The collection of data and the techniques used in the analysis of data are clarified completely. The members, which are RN's, LPN's, and CNA's in the doctor's facility were requested to maintain all information private. Be that as it may, they got some information about the failure to perform routine parts of their everyday occupations before their associates. This could make individuals get to be uncomfortable and withhold data from the analyst, paying little mind to her certification of classification. More legitimacy and protection could have been gotten from a coordinated meeting. It would not be difficult to envision that individuals would not have any desire to take an interest in this study, hence alone.
Method
The information gathering and information investigation strategies are clarified completely. The members were requested that focus on secrecy. Be that as it may, they were gotten some information about fail to perform routine parts of their everyday employments before their associates. This could make individuals get to be uncomfortable and withhold data from the scientist, paying little respect to her confirmation of privacy. More legitimacy and security could have been gotten from a balanced meeting. It would not be difficult to envision that individuals would not have any desire to take an interest in this study, consequently alone.
The examination convention is distinguished in the exploration outline area. The center gatherings utilized by the questioner were the sole method for information accumulation; no time was spent in the field watching the subjects. The outline seems to have been pre-decided before any meetings had been led which means it did not develop in the field. It does not offer the impression of being any reflexivity, or self-reflection about inclinations in this segment. The measure of contact made with the study members was constrained to one and only session. The analyst documented the subject's announcements by a recording device, and the information was investigated different times.
The example is plainly characterized. It expresses the job titles of the members and the measure of deputies from every employment title. Moreover, the quantity of center gatherings and the length of the group meeting are expressed. Data on the healing centers where the subjects work is incorporated into the article. It is not clear how the specialist could get access to the office. The information accumulation strategy for center gathering interviews ends up being reliable with grounded hypothesis and the naturalistic worldview. The information from the center gatherings was tape recorded, then deciphered. This was the primary technique for information gathering, which may diminish the consistent quality of the study. It is not specified which inquiries were asked by the scientist or who was driving the center meetings. From the length of the center gathering interviews and the example size, it is sheltered to say that the information was of an adequate amount to give extravagance and profundity to the study.
Procedures
The data accumulation systems are expressed apparently under the information investigation area, and another scientist could effortlessly recreate it. The recording methods are also noted and are adequate for this sort of study. By straightforwardly recording the education members, there is no space to add individual emotions or predispositions. It is not specified who led the center gathering or the measure of preparing they had. To upgrade the legitimacy of the information, it was broken down by two individual authors freely of each other. The writer incorporates criteria for the information to wind up a topic in the information investigation area of the article.
Results/Data Analysis
The data examination techniques are represented in this segment. The author says she utilizes a grounded hypothesis approach. However, there is no express reference of her coding or which grounded theory model was used. From the examination rose a few subjects, which the author goes ahead to depict. Predisposition was effectively lessened by the techniques depicted in the above area. More data on the information investigation techniques could be incorporated.
Findings
Findings from the study are distinguished and clarified in this segment. Often, quotes are utilized from the center gatherings which bolster the proposed topic. The subjects express to the reader why the medical attendant cannot regularly complete his or her nursing care. The discoveries of the particular nursing assignments and also the topics fit the first idea and system of the study. The inquiries from the earliest starting point of the article are addressed, and the reader can truly comprehend the perspective of the medical caretaker and the deterrents she confronts. The citations unquestionably include a component of comprehension for the reader and give great understanding to the laid out topics.
Recommendations
In this area, the authors clarify how we can consolidate discoveries from their study into our practice. Their discoveries are talked about, and the analyst clarifies how the information is important to medical attendants and administrators on med-surgical units and how it can diminish the measure of missed care. The author additionally communicates what questions stay unanswered and the open doors for future examination on this particular subject. Additionally, she says parts of her study which can be enhanced.
Conclusion
The report was composed and sorted out well. The immediate citations from study members gave an adroit depiction of why medical attendants missed care. Maybe more citations could be incorporated to improve the portrayals. After reading the article, one can tell the analyst is a sound source. The decision of strategies, information examination, and general format of the article indicates she is an accomplished scientist. Toward the end of the article, the author states different inquiries that remain unanswered, which give a premise to a future examination which demonstrates how nursing care influences the patients and their recuperation.
Reference
Kalisch, B. (2006). Missed Nursing Care A Qualitative Study. J Nurs Care Qual, 21(4), 306-313.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams.
