Discussion
The evaluation of cognitive functions remains a vital concern especially in developing an understanding as well as ideal treatment a range of psychological and physical illnesses. In most cases, orally or written administered measures are put in place for purposes used to assessing aspects of the human brain and its functioning ability. These measures include general intelligence tests specifically aimed at testing the cognitive function similar to the Cognitive Functioning Scale Level. For the cognitive function measurements, factors like memory, level of consciousness, and attention span are put into consideration. The altered cognitive function states and rational thought or brain function is a fundamental of physical brain injury or mental illness indicator in most cases regions.
According to psychologist Robert Sternberg, intelligence is defined as the mental activity aimed at purposively adapting to, shaping and selection of, real-world environments and remains relevant to a person’s life. This is in agreement with Gardner of the fact that intelligence is broader as compared to a single and general ability in better viewing the same as individual talents. Further, British psychologist Charles Spearman perceived the concept to be referred to a general intelligence element or g factor. Through a technique called factor analysis into examining various mental aptitude tests, Spearman added that the scores on the tests were similar.
Achievement constructs and intelligence constructs address different areas. An achievement construct measures what an individual has learned within certain subjects. Intelligence constructs measures person’s potential within the external world. For this reason, the scoring of the tests diversely varies. Intelligence constructs address people through a standard deviation. Notably, intelligence cannot by itself produce achievement. The achievement occurrence will require motivation and environment as well as a level of ability.
