The scenario presented in the case highlight that friendship is formed among the various characters that are involved. Through the duration that employees spend in an organization there is a bond that is created. Through this bond, there is a level of comfort that is developed where employees in different departments relate. This is regardless of the professional gap that exists between employees in different levels. Through the level of correlation that is created, various employees can effectively air their views. This promoted by the fact that they are confident in themselves, and convinced that there is confidentiality in the matters that they discuss. The level at which the individuals in these studies relate is not professionally viable.
This is because they tend to cross and professionals boundaries that should be in existence between different departments. It is acknowledgeable that this level of bonding may be hazarders (Peterson, 2005). This has the potential of affecting the firm negatively based on the decisions reached. It is required that professionalism be maintained where employees do not think that they can cross policies due to existing social bonds. It is expected that all decisions made in a company serve the interests of the parties and should not be tied down to emotional or social bonds that may exist in work places. It is evident through the study that employees can exploit the diverse social bonds that are created at work places in their best interest.
Through analyzing the case, it is evident that the manager refuses to be persuaded by his colleague into making decisions that are based on personal views of one individual over the well-being of the company. This is because he acknowledges the need for consultation and following various policies that are in the organization. It is acknowledgeable that the foundation of any firm business is founded on the need to ensure that all policies are followed. This is because all matters that involve the operations of a business should be solely done in accordance to the knowledge and support of the shareholders (Peterson, 2005). This is because the shareholders are what any organization is made of since they have put their resources into the business. Therefore, it is expected that every decision that is made is in the best interest of the involved parties.
Such situations can be minimized in the organization through ensuring that all employees are informed on the significance of following organizations policies. This is because the accomplishments of the business are determined by the organizations ability to abide by the set policies. Workers should also be made aware that the investors are to be consulted of any decisions endorsed by the company (Peterson, 2005). In particular, workers are entitled to be informed of all decisions that are to be reached in the organization. Social bonds and personal interest should also not influence the organization’s decisions. The sentiment is supported by the perspective that organization essentially comprised of many individuals other than the employees of the organization.
As a future leader, I have learnt that I should guarantee that all decisions reached in an association are in the greatest interest of all individuals. This is because an organization is not a personal business where choices are to be made due to personal interest. I have acknowledged that I should set a boundary between my relations with employees. This would safeguard me from being influenced by social bonds that can make me adopt decisions without going through the proper channels.
References
Peterson, R. A. (2005). Business ethics: New challenges for business schools and corporate leaders. Armonk, NY [u.a.: Sharpe.
