What should we have for dinner? Such a question appears so straightforward and contrary to the societal norms of eating habits that may guide us to steer the world to a sustainable ecosystem management. As traditionally determined the human beings are the greatest omnivores of all times with selective eating habits, which reflect the ideals of other omnivores in the ecological system. According to Pollan, the period before the current technological advancements, eating habits, and theories were resolved . The major stand that resolved the dilemma was the cultural forces of the universe as well as the societal organization that influenced habitual orientations in humanity as well as other animals. Ideally, our eating habits as omnivores are the parameters that drive our society. In a natural way, we have a selective standard that may derail our environmental sustainability to create a productive stand. This essay draws a variety of nuances from Pollan and other scholars to facilitate an effective Earth sustainability.
The omnivore’s dilemma dwells upon the variety that an organism may have to eat. When humans eat, we extend a variety of things that poses the question of what to eat at what time (Verplanken & Woods 2006). The dealing extracts the fraught anxious element of an organism creating stress and elementary structures. From the cows and other extraordinary herbivores, the stress does not exist. For instance, the cows eat only grass. Such dependence is ideal as they always have their food without stress on what to eat at any given time. For human beings, nature offers a variety of choices such as the supermarket. The choices usually have no standard measure of nutrient content or beneficial values. As such, some tend to lengthen the person’s life while others shorten the life incredibly.
One way to create a sustainable eating habit is to create a culture to enhance our eating values. The culture that Pollan talks of in this context is the sustainable traditional foods that determine our life incredibly REH. The traditional habits of eating have a means of influencing the choice and preparation of our eating habit to create a sustainable environment for every organism. An example of such knowledge is the instance that it is okay to eat morels but only after, they have been carefully cooked. Such a deal with the relationship and culture will serve to create a dominant inhibitory nature of human life and relieve the human life of dilemmas in selection and option ability (Baroni et al 2006).
Additionally, in the contemporary American society, as well as other parts of the world, appropriate systems to enhance an effective eating for a sustained environment. Culture and the individuality often lack a correlation today so that people have no means to make their choices from any background. The subsequent factor that emerges in such contexts if the buffeting of information that the scholarly word proffers. As is expected, the books will expect you to cut down on fats, reduce sugar intake, and avoid diabetes or cancer and many other precautionary elements. When mixed together, one remains more confused due to the conflicting ideals of reality. One dominant example is the current carbophobia that gripped the American market taking away the wholesome meal of carbohydrates, as was the tradition. In a way, the new means of eating derives a relative elementary factor not to be compared to any nuance. Such distractive factors are bound to reduce the life span of many people and create confusion in food selection.
In a further analysis of the food chains of sustenance according to Pollan, the various chains have a significant element of depletion. For instance, the industrial food, organic, as well as alternative chains has a semblance on the corn to produce a greater part of the food production especially for the industrial nuance. The corn factor in many industries tend to emerge from the fact that the food stuff is easily available and provides an easy food to meant as compared to the different elements necessary. Such interplant elements have a way of fostering the actual output mechanism to link every device in place. The implications of eating so much corn are traceable to the human eating habit, which determines that we become omnivores in the outlook. The one food factor has a way of depriving our body of many elements of necessity as is depicted by the society. The corn factor tends to create obese children who have a limited life span. The growing of so much corn also leads to the deprivation of vital nutrients from the environment. For instance, many corn products are nitrogen-depriving meaning that growing of too much corn deprives the soil of vital nitrogenous elements to drive the other aspects of the ecosystem.
Therefore, it is vital to have food chains that sustain the environment in the sense that they provide the environment with the right value of nutrient as they take their share of the same. Organic food substances must have a means of encouraging an equal balance with the synthetic elements to create a sustainable product output in the final sections of the ecosystem.
Reference
Baroni, L., Cenci, L., Tettamanti, M., & Berati, M. (2006). Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61(2), 279-286.
Pollan, M. (2013, July 21). Penguin.com USA interviews. Retrieved from Penguin.Com: http://www.us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/omnivores_dilemma.html
Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 90-103.
