Discuss the value of transparent internet compared to a regulated one
In the contemporary society, internet has encouraged impressive growth thus leading to the connectivity of the world. For example, through internet, there have been many innovations around the globe and it has allowed people from all over to share and access knowledge. The most significant part of the internet is its flexibility, openness and standardization. Therefore, this implies that failing to allow transparency in internet will be the start to destruction of different innovations that have shaped the contemporary world. On the contrary, allowing a transparent internet will encourage innovation, support internet standards and enhance the exchange of ideas and knowledge, which will promote development around the globe (Levmore & Nussbaum, 2010).
Initially, transparent internet has many values compared to regulated one. This is because transparency in internet encourages more innovation and competition around the globe. This is possible since different interesting stories surrounding internet started from somewhere similar to how most of the giant business in the society started as an attractive idea. Therefore, the ability to allow the transparency of internet will allow other small companies grow rapidly because they will have a chance of accessing relevant information essential in expansion. Consequently, regulating internet is similar to regulating innovation, which will affect development negatively (Anandarajan, Simmers & Teo, 2006).
Remarkably, transparency in internet has more advantages compared to regulated internet because it persuades exchange of relevant information and promote the rights of consumers. This is because allowing free internet will augment the ability to share and discuss ideas. In addition, regulating internet will be similar to breaching peoples’ right regarding freedom of expression (Spinello, 2011). Finally, internet should be transparent because it is different from other networks applied in communication. For example, even though radios and television are common among many homes, they are not similar with internet. This is because internet acts as an interactive medium, by allowing both parties to participate and embrace technology unlike most radio and television stations, which involve the participation of one individual (Information Resources Management Association & Khosrowpour, 2001).
References
Anandarajan, M., Simmers, C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2006). The Internet and workplace transformation. Armonk, NY [u.a.: M.E. Sharpe.
Information Resources Management Association., & Khosrowpour, M. (2001). Managing information technology in a global environment. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Levmore, S. X., & Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). The offensive Internet: Speech, privacy, and reputation. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Spinello, R. (2011) CyberEthics : Morality and Law in Cyberspace, 4th edition Jones & Bartlett Pub.
