This essay is based on three essays. These essays include Faith and Diplomacy, Making Conversation, and The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention. From the surface one might conclude that these two essays ate talking about the same thing. However, this is not the case. The authors of these two authors of these three authors are using words that might seem to the author to have the same meaning to the audience in order to be able to express themselves in the best way possible. One thing that is important to realize is that these three essays illustrate high levels of writing skills and mastery of the topic in the part of these authors. This paper intends to looks at the central ideas and messages that these essays are trying to convey.
First of all, it is important to look at Albright’s essay entitled “Faith and Diplomacy.” In this essay, the author uses stories about how the faith of certain individuals, factions, and organizations helps to shape the lives of these entities. The faith and persistence that is employed by the individuals and entities discussed helps them to withstand the various challenges that face them in their daily lives as well as allowing them to be able to conquer tragedies that could terminate their hopes and visions in life. On the other hand, Appiah, the author of the essay entitled “Making Conversation” takes a totally different approach to capture the attention of his audience. Unlike Albright who uses imagery and short stories to pass his message to his audience, Appiah explains the power that conversation can have on the life of an individual. Appiah is quick to point out that communication is a key tool in realizing both institutional and global peace and cohesion. Many global issues that discuss some sensitive issues like the question of environmental protection are reached through conversation. Therefore, Humanity as an element is shaped by the power of conversation.
Unlike Appiah and Albright, Friedman in his essay “the Dell Theory of Conflict” does not employ hypothesis to pass his message to the audience. Instead, Friedman uses theory to justify the logic of his perspective about global harmony. In his story, Friedman uses the idea that global connectedness is a recipe to the realization of global harmony. Friedman is quick to talk about the emergent forces of globalization and internationalization which have caused people from different parts of the world to be in a position to communicate and frequently interact easily compared to the past. This shift from the traditional paradigm that centers on the question of territorial sovereignty has been made possible by the fact that the world has witnessed technological advancement that has improved both the communication and transport industry. In this way, people and goods can easily move from one territory to another therefore increasing the availability of goods and services across various territories.
Based on the approaches that assumed by these three authors, it is clear that there are trying to draw a relationship between humanity and the ever evolving world. This is the central idea that these authors tend to revolve. Trying to make these connections is motivated by the fact that humanity depends on what nature has to provide in owner to meet his or her needs.
Phycology writes that is that it is human nature to give priority to our basic needs. Some of the basic wants that humanity cannot live without include food, clothing, and shelter. The ability to be able to obtain both basic and secondary wants dictates one’s standard of living. Affluence and lack are two principles that characterize human needs. Shelter for instance in one part of the world may include nothing more than a grass hut; while in other parts of the world in might, be a 3-bedroom 2-bath home on a 6000 square foot lot. Depending on the availability of resources, humanity is bound to depend on the depth of their pockets to live a quality life. Despite the availability of basic needs, humanity also has so other wants that shapes their level of happiness. One basic human need that is often overlooked is the need to belong. Being connected to a family unit or a given community is important. The ability to create a connection between oneself and a given community also rests on Appiah’s idea about the power of communication.
For instance, in Appiah’s essay, he spoke about the Roman Empire developing systems for growing food outside of Rome he said. Appiah writes that the Romans “had already worked out how to live check to jowl in societies where most of those who spoke your language and shared your laws and grew the food on your table you would never know"(Appiah 57). In this case Appiah shows how the power of conversation can be used as a tool to be able to obtain key human needs like food. Albright also seems to draw from a similar philosophy. In his story about tells John Paul II and his journey to meet the Polish people. John Paul II "above all, urges his countrymen not to be afraid. “(Albright 25). This is a clear indication that conversation has the power to build motivation towards meeting a given objective. Thomas Fried Friedman extrapolates the idea about the power of conversation by theorizing that communication and working together enables people to withstand pressures and end up fulfilling their objectives. For instance, Friedman uses the McDonald theory where he explains that the characters involved “preferred to wait in line for burgers"(Friedman 125). This is a clear indication that working together makes people stronger because these people were not worried about the line because they had company.
In conclusion, the three authors, Albright, Appiah, and Friedman talk about how human kind interacts with the world in order to effectively meet his basic needs. Among some of the key ideas derived from these three authors is the idea that conversation has the power to bound people together and contributes to the realization of global harmony.
Works Cited
Albright, Madeleine Korbel. Faith and Diplomacy. Washington, DC: Council on Faith & International Affairs, 2006. Print.
Appiah, Anthony. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2006. Print.
"Thomas Friedman The Dell Theory of Conflict Essays and Term Papers." Thomas Friedman The Dell Theory Of Conflict Free Essays 1. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 June 2012.
