S.M.A.R.T Goals and Actions
S.M.A.R.T Goals and Actions
The first S.M.A.R.T goal involves the effort to enrich safety by incorporating the “follow safe rigging & lifting practices” and “work in confined spaces safely” to some up with lifesaving rules in all security operation. The steps are:
Identification of the hazards associated with these operations, which is realized through a thorough risk analysis.
Precisely mapping out the Responsibility of each person in rigging and lifting, to ensure that no part of the process is left unmanned.
Identification of the Lifting limitations of devices and equipment being used, to avoid overloading.
Establishment of clear Communication lines and procedures. This will also include warnings given before the processes start, with every party armed with sufficient communication equipment.
Training on personal Conduct during rigging, lifting or working in confined spaces. This will touch on aspects such as where to place hands and feet when working and how to walk when carrying loads.
Consideration of the environmental factors in the working area. Aspect such as electric wires and tall trees need to be taken into account.
Identification of the legal requirements concerning confined space entry. Permits are usually required for one to work in such locations.
Making of emergency arrangements for confined spaces and processes involved in lifting and rigging.
Identification of the Best practices in all the processes, with special consideration given to regulations and company policies on the same (Occupational Safety & Health Administration, n.d.).
The second S.M.A.R.T goal involves coming up with defined duties for a contract security service vendor. The steps are:
The Security Manager will be in charge of all the security plans adopted, and will be accountable for any security lapses. The manager will also oversee the recruitment and training of staff.
The Assistant Manager on intelligence will be responsible for obtaining information on any possible security threats.
The Assistant Manager in charge of investigation will be responsible for following up on various safety issues under investigation.
The Assistant Manager in charge of disaster management will be responsible for disaster preparedness of the security department by identifying risks and drawing up plans.
The Deputy Manager in charge of security operations will be the chief of staff and in charge of all security operations when the security manager is not present.
The first Assistant Manager in charge of security operations will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the security plan. The docket will also be in charge of job training.
The second Assistant Manager in charge of operations security operations will oversee the discipline of the staff while ensuring that their welfare is catered for.
The Assistant Manager in charge of technical operations will manage the utilization of security equipment, keep up with innovation in the field and offer training to the staff.
The assistant manager in charge of communication will ensure that communication equipment for the security department are well installed and maintained.
The assistant manager in charge of administration will oversee all the administrative matters and training that is non-technical (Subramanian, 2006).
The third S.M.A.R.T goal entails creating procedures required for an oil and company corporate security operations headquarters. The steps are:
Conducting of an extensive risk assessment to identify the possible threats that could compromise the functioning of a company.
Identification of the effect of each of the identified threats, to the critical operations of an institution.
Establishing the likelihood of the risks materializing, by using historical data.
Mapping out the potential losses once a security threat emerges within an institution.
Determining the costs required to aid in the recovery processes.
Identification of alternative action plans to mitigate the risk posed by the security threats.
Choosing the most cost-effective option and developing an action plan for threat mitigation.
Identifying the key stakeholders in the plan, and their responsibilities.
Seeking approval of the action plan from the right authorities.
Communication and sensitization of the various players about the chosen action plan (Subramanian, 2006).
References
ADA National Network. (n.d.). What is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Retrieved February 25, 2016, from adata.org: https://adata.org/learn-about-ada
Occupational Safety & Health Administration. (n.d.). Rigging Process. Retrieved February 26, 2016, from osha.gov: https://www.osha.gov/dts/maritime/sltc/ships/rigging/rigging_process.html
Subramanian, S. (2006). Industrial Security Management. Gyan Publishing House.
The Americans with Disabilities Act. (n.d.). Retrieved February 25, 2016, from accessiblesociety.org: http://www.accessiblesociety.org/topics/ada/
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commision. (n.d.). Facts About the Americans with Disabilities Act. Retrieved February 25, 2016, from www.eeoc.gov: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/fs-ada.cfm
Walker-Jones, J. (2014). EEOC: ADA Case Law Update.
