Response: The Effects and Implications of
The paper explored the concept of eutrophication, since it appears to be a pressing problem that has a negative impact on various organisms and the environment as a whole. A small clarification was provided that the increased number of nutrients within the ecosystem can be natural or anthropogenic. Thus, eutrophication
When it comes to the structure of the research, the abstract gives a brief idea about the whole paper and owing to clear table of contents, specific sections are well organized. It should be noted that eutrophication has a significant influence on farming. Human activities tend to be a core cause of eutrophication. With regard to the location, it has been examined that estuaries, lakes and coastal regions are most common places for eutrophication. The excess nutrients consumed by people and animals are released as urine or feces. The section that is called sewage from animals and humans discusses necessity of processing human sewage in treatment facilities, while animal’s sewage can be easily absorbed by the soil and then rain wash it into a body of water.
The effects from eutrophication are rather surprising. The fact that dead zones are increasing all over the world is extremely alarming tendency. The exposure of harmful toxins by algal blooms raise a number of serious concerns. It is fairly optimistic that the reversal of eutrophication is possible, however in order to ensure such reverse process, biomanipulation should be used. Nonetheless, the section that suggests preventative measures of eutrophication is not fully developed. Even though the points are rather relevant, the reference to Nixon (1995) seems to be a bit outdated. Overall, the paper is pretty informative, as the effects of eutrophication are clearly outlined.
