Philosophy
Explain some of the benefits a student may gain by studying philosophy.
Philosophy enables one to reason and it represents almost every aspect of one’s life. Studying philosophy enables one to understand themselves better, understand the purpose of their lives and be in a position to account for most happenings in their daily lives.
Explain the Socratic Method of Teaching. Is this a useful way for students to learn?
Socratic Method of teaching is a technique that involves a dialogue between the student and the teacher where the teacher poses questions at the students continuously. It is an efficient method of learning because the teacher is able to shape the student’s outlooks and thoughts.
Explain how critical thinking can be used to analyze a philosophical issue
Critical thinking emphases on reasoning and an appraisal of dialect to tin an effort to describe questions, scrutinize descriptions and define what is accurate concerning the world. Analytical thinking breaks down bulky sentences into lesser denotations.
Compare and contrast deduction, induction, and abduction.
Deduction, induction and abduction compare in that they are all approaches of argumentation. Deduction refers to the manner of finding data to support an argument. Abduction refers to supplying anauthorization that permitsone to change from statistics to argument. Induction on the other hand refers to finding adispute to elucidatecertain data.
Explain some of the different areas of philosophy which will be discussed in this course.
Philosophy is a compound arena that involves varied different areas of thought. Some of the areas are aesthetics, Africana Philosophy, ethics, existentialism, History of Philosophy, philosophy of religion and political philosophy.
Compare and contrast various views on substance such as materialism, idealism, and dualism
Idealism has the outlook that the nature or reality is based on minds and opinions only. Materialism sums on substance as the only prevailing article in the space. Dualism believes that a non-physical can generate a physical action. These three compare in that they believe in the existence of a physical reaction.
Plato had four views. That the worldwide survives subsistently, distant from the cognizance, that the worldwide is in the object itself; that the entire is associated to a system which is exists solely and that the entire is a single linked to a joint system which is not single nor several.
Explain and evaluate the views of Anaximander regarding the nature of substance
Anaximander believed that the rudimentary constituent from which all originates need be more basic than water. The substance should be boundless and ageless. His theory explained things in the perspective of regular powers
Explain and evaluate the views of Pythagoras regarding the nature of substance
Pythagoras established a logical, radical, and spiritual culture whose followers thought that the sphere could be expounded by means of arithmetic as grounded upon whole quantities and their proportions.
Explain Aristotle’s 4 causes
Material explained the composition of an object being described. The second cause is the formal outline of the item or the design which this party of body takes. Efficient cause is the foundation of the chief principle of modification or permanency. The purpose of an object is the thing that is admired.
Compare and contrast rationalism and empiricism
. Rationalism involves the certainty in distinctive concepts, motive, and assumption. Empiricism is the acceptance in intellect insight, orientation, without essential ideas. Both principles begin with rudimentary philosophies like the maxims of geometry.
Explain the difference between A priori and A Posteriori Knowledge
A priori knowledge or rationalization is self-governing of involvement, as with mathematics, reiterations, and inference from untainted motive. A posteriori knowledge is reliant on familiarity or pragmatic evidence, like most features of learning and individual knowledge.
Compare and contrast Foundationalism and Coherentism
Coherentism is the denial that all explanation dashes back to stuffs that people are instantly warranted in considering. Foundationalism on the other hand refers to supposed principles that originate new principles typically developed unidirectional. Both encompass the customary attitudes to establishing beliefs
Compare and contrast pragmatic theories of truth with the correspondence theory of truth
The correspondence theory of truth says that the certainty of a declaration is resolute merely by the way it re-counts to the ecosphere. A pragmatic theory of truth is a philosophy of certainty in the viewpoints of practicality and pragmatisms.
What are some of the implications of Godel’s Theorem
Godel firstly demonstrated that however complicated ideologies are, no semantic philosophies such as certainty, mathematical truth can explain them. Godel sought to demonstrate the confines of numerical fact
