Example Of Argumentative Essay On What Some Call Self-Writing By Jim W. Corder

On Argument, What Some Call “Self-Writing,” and Trying to See the Back of One’s Own Eyeballs,” was written by Jim W. Corder. The author strongly defends “self-writing” and its central relation to rhetoric. In the first part of the essay, Corder talks about the unique version of Aristotle’s rhetoric by detailing five and not four rhetorical classes. The classes highlighted entail intellectual, willful, emotional, spiritual and corporal rhetoric. Corder adds a 6th class that discusses the rhetoric experienced by both the writer and the reader. He highlights that it is difficult for any person to realize “the backs of your own eyeballs.” This identifies errors in arguments as the author confronts them for what they are. For instance, the arguments not perceived as described include “barbs, slurs, and insults.” Jim W. Corder names them “shorthand arguments” that emerges out of “one world” to oppose another and are components of completed thoughts of the speaker. Corder believes that the error is associated with lies experienced in debates on matters on conviction because the “argument is already over before it begins.” The contents of his article are controversial because of the arguments of the narrator. The author applies ethos, pathos and logos to institute authority and link with readers in a perfect manner. The paper shall candidly and comprehensively elucidate on the classical principles of argumentation-ethos, pathos and logos- as used by Jim W. Corder to develop authority throughout his article and connect with the readers.
Jim W. Corder is considered a teacher and a prolific scholar. He is popularly recognized for his rhetoric studies and teachings in writing. In the article, the author uses ethos (authority) to defend “self-writing” The essay highlights the commitment of Corder in explaining the real situation associated with self-writing. His objective was to deliver an important argument by claiming, “All writing is self-writing.”
Interestingly, the author adopts an authoritative voice when expressing his opinions and thoughts throughout the essay. He uses a firm and steady tone to explain the urgency required in understanding self-wring and the rhetoric associated with the idea. As a result, readers easily capture the message that targets them. The message content is something that Corder has strong feelings towards.
The ethos argument is demonstrated by Corder as he applies his rhetoric expertise to explain the significant points in the article. His character is judged by his capacity to address comprehensively “self-writing.” Jim W. Corder argues, “Personal rhetoric’s underlie formal arguments.” He exposes assumptions associated with his other writings, and this makes the essay a crucial one.
In the essay, the author uses pathos-the appeal to emotion to capture the reader’s emotion. The author uses the concept of pathos to enrich the concept of rhetoric in argumentation. His skills addressed rhetorical situations in narratives in a unique manner. Corder appeals to the listeners and readers when he describes techniques known as “self-writing.” He claims that the technique results to pointless arguing. The emotions of the readers are captured when Corder opposes those who think that self-writing is ‘drivel’ and claims, “all writing is self-writing.” The author defends the writing style by claiming how it is self-revealing, grounded on the experience, and this assists him to create a writer’s rhetoric.
Logos is prevalent in “On Argument, What Some Call “Self-Writing,” and Trying to See the Back of One’s Own Eyeballs article.” Jim W. Corder defends self-writing in a logical manner. His reasoning makes the work beautiful to be desired by listeners and readers. The author explains the techniques in rhetoric argument and his ability appeals to readers. His writing is controversial as he criticizes those against his logical reasoning. As a scholar in rhetoric and composition, the author introduces listeners and readers into the inventive universe and disagrees with the ones holding antagonistic viewpoints. He develops the best way into which a writer understands the scenes of rhetoric.
In conclusion, Jim W. Corder has expressed his authority to construct a valid argument in his article by applying the ethos, pathos, and logos. The argument is strong enough to convince the reader to understand self-writing. Corder uses his expertise to compose his opinions and views. The use of authoritative voice is also significant in composing the essay. Corder uses all important elements and assists the readers to understand his article.