In the field of medicine, embryonic stem cell research is a major breakthrough which gives new hope for patients with chronic illnesses and a promise for a better life for long-suffering patients. However, the debate continues as to whether embryonic stem cell research is morally acceptable. The debate is centered on two moral principles. One is “the duty to prevent or alleviate suffering” and the other is “the duty to respect the value of human life”.
There are several reasons why one does not believe that embryonic stem cell research is ethically acceptable. First, in order to obtain an embryonic stem cell, it is necessary to destroy an early embryo, which means ending a human life. One feels that whether it is an embryo, a fetus, a baby or a fully-grown human being, no one is justified to cut short a life just to save another life. Especially if it is an embryo, because it cannot even defend itself; it is so helpless against those who wish to curtail his life. Some people claim that an embryo is not yet human while others believe on the contrary. But for one, suffice it to say that if there is no certainty that it is human or not, then it is even more justified that it should not be killed. Under no circumstance is it acceptable to kill embryos, even in the guise of medical advances. An embryo should be given a chance to live. Besides, one finds it difficult to comprehend whether a sick person is willing to kill another human just to make him well.
The only situation where embryonic stem cell research can be ethically acceptable is when the fertilized egg can no longer develop into a human being because of natural causes. Otherwise, an embryo at any time in its development stage should be considered human; thus, must be treated with dignity and respect.
Works Cited
Hug, Kristina. "Embryonic stem cell research: an ethical dilemma." 23 March 2011. eurostemcell.org. 5 April 2013
