Article analysis: What you don't know about making decisions
Article analysis: What you don't know about making decisions
The aspect of making wise and rational decisions is to be able to rather give reasons that support or criticize a particular position. The Basic aspect of an argumentation process helps one to skillfully conceptualize and to apply the required knowledge in the presented ideas to a particular field. According to David A. Garvin and Michael A. Roberto, setting a strategy and motivating people is key in decision making process. The chapter is keen in giving insights concerning the approaches given to the decision-making framework.
- Decisions as Process: Inquiry versus Advocacy.
- Constructive Conflict
- Consideration
- Closure
- Advocacy Versus Inquiry in Action
- Critical thinking and decision making
Decision making is a process and rather not an event that is sated with nuances and personal aspects which helps an individual or organization to achieve its ultimate goals. The basic tenet of analyzing, synthesizing and critically giving rational thoughts on the process of decision making is key and vital in making an approach. According to the authors, the difference between good decisions and bad ones made by leaders within an organization framework is because of striking. Hence rational thoughts are included in the decision making process to help ensure that they properly fit the specified task.
This is a model properly formulated to effectively and systematically work in the form that aims at achieving a particular decision set. The approach is simplified to help prevent the complexity in the whole matter, in the due process. The process engulfs the ethical and rational thoughts in ensuring that correct decisions are made. The framework works hand in hand with other keenly implemented factors to ensure that a variety of options and approaches are gathered together to discover the best solution.
Importance in Decision Making:
Decision making is key in ensuring the success of the organization. Critical thinking is key in the decision making process. This is through putting in place all the required approaches to help in formulating the best decision to be implemented. The process also helps in the management and leadership of the various aspects within the managerial scope. In addition Pervasiveness of the decisions made is properly implemented by the working staff within the organization set up. Finally, the process also helps in planning and implementing policies to help best fit the alternatives chosen within the process.
Key concepts:
Closure
Making decision on when to end something is a bit challenging. Usually, decision makers make rush decisions and make conclusions or can reach pre-mature decisions. Making pre-mature decisions or reaching to decisions late can be destructive; usually it is attributed to unchecked advocacy. Deciding too early results from ‘groupthink' in essence, this happens in a situation where both old and new members are in the same panel. The new members might be forced to follow suit because of their little knowledge or experience concerning matters and rules. In the other hand, late decisions are caused by unchecked advocacy. Late decisions when members fail to reach into a central concession. Lack of proper mechanism to deal with the issue will definitely result to endless loop. This is a situation whereby some people are ready to accept and become contented with the decisions made. Sometimes those overruled tend to refuse the outcome of the decisions made and the result is partial acceptance. People believe leaders are there to represent them. Therefore, their decisions ought to be appreciated and considered by the subjects.
Constructive conflict
Intense debate over something can result conflicts. However, conflicts and rigorous debates can converge issues into a single point, thus enabling leaders make effective decisions. Similarly, some conflicts can result destroy decision-making process. For example when people debate thoroughly about an issue, they will explore all weaknesses and create new ideas.
Decision making process; inquiry versus advocacy
No doubt, there are decisions that are not effective. Inquiry is considered an open process aimed to generate various options, enhance exchange of ideas and come up with proper results. Advocacy is the use of consensus methods to reach a decision; this means that there is representation.
Conclusion
The basic aspect of Critical thinking and decision making helps in the general form of ensuring that key alternatives are implemented in the organizational process. Setting strategies and implementing the critically thought decisions would effectively help in the governing and leading of the people within an organization framework.
Critical thinking and decision are making help leaders achieve both personal and organizational goals set before them. All managers and concerned stakeholders, work along the set Decision making framework to help them achieve better results in the management.
The Key concepts involved in the decision making process through implementing of critical thoughts include; closure, Constructive conflict and inquiry versus advocacy process in the process of selecting the best alternatives within the framework. Hence according to the authors, truths concerning the correct decisions implemented comes from the critically thought aspects and within the framework.
.
Reference
David A. Garvin and Michael A. Roberto. 1995. What You Don’t Know About Making Decisions.
