Example Of My Stand Is Against Animal Testing Specifically For Medicine Purposes Research Paper

Man co-exists with animals and nature on the earth. The animals that share the earth with us too have fears, and are able to feel pain in their bodies. Hence it is illegal and unethical to experiment upon the animals in the name of discovering remedies to various diseases of the mankind. Experimenters and medical researchers intentionally cause damage to different body parts of animals, in addition to artificially inducing conditions like cancer in their bodies. Every year millions of animals, including monkeys, guinea pigs, dogs, rabbits, mice and frogs are tested or killed by researchers and scientists of the medical fraternity across the world. Even though the intention of the researchers is to deeply understand the causes for certain diseases and conditions in human beings, and finding remedies, it is quite unethical to use innocent animals for doing medical research. Against the popular belief of medical researchers, most experiments with animals do not lead to progress human health considerably. Thus the value of using animals for experimentation remains questionable.
An article published in 2006 in The Journal of the American Medical Association cautions researchers on the rare translation of treatments advanced by testing on animals to the humans. Also, artificially stimulated diseases in monkeys and mice are much different to those occurring in man naturally. Researchers must note that results of animal experiments may not exactly match human bodies since the body conditions of animals significantly vary from one species to another. Dr Richard Klausner, Director, National Cancer Institute, admits that though medical science has cured cancer in mice, it has failed to cure the same in humans, which has been echoed by many prominent medical researchers including Dr Elias Zerhouni, former Director of National Institutes of Health. Echoing that, Dr Elias warns that the medical fraternity is moving away from researching and understanding diseases of humans in human bodies.
A 2002 report published by the Medical Research Modernization Committee entitled “A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation,” reveals yet another shocking truth. The report, challenging the validity of research, says that more often the species being used for lab experiments are selected due to nonscientific reasons like lesser cost and easiness in handling.
Yet another report published by Jarrod Bailey in 2008 reveals that the 85 successful vaccines to treat HIV/AIDS in animals had failed to cure the same in man. Also, scientists are unable to predict correctly how newly discovered drugs manufactured after experimenting on animals act in human bodies, which results in nine out of every ten new drugs fail, states the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in a news release dated 12 January 2006. Since experimenters hardly publish failed results on experimenting upon animals, the fellow scientific community and general public are not aware of the futility of animal tests.
The animal loving tax payers’ money should not be used to promote violence on innocent animals. Hence, agencies funding animal experimentation must understand the reality and refrain from funding for this unethical practice. Instead, the funders and researchers may concentrate on discovering new medicines from natural organic plant sources, and promoting a healthy and natural way of living to the general public.