Example Of The Frog Prince Essay

Robert Pack is a renowned lecturer and author in the United States as well as in the entire globe. He was born in 1929 in New York City. He attended his tertiary education at Dunmore College and Columbia University. He was a lecturer in many universities including the University of Montana. The author of many books is the sole writer of the “The Frog Prince” poem. This is a poem that is entailed of various writing techniques which make it interesting as well as meaningful. The poem has been constructed through excellent writing elements for an extremely meaningful platform.
One of the elements that can be observed from the poem is the resonance. This refers to the tendency of a piece of writing to change frequencies at some points. In the first line of the poem, the author uses an exclamation mark to indicate the intensity of the words used as well as pay adequate weight on the message being delivered. This is critical in indicating message for the poem. Through resonance the author shows that it was funny to have the frog becoming the prince. This element is exclusive significant in the definition of meaning for the poem. Also, the element is shown by use of a word like surprise at the end of the first sentence followed by an exclamation mark.
The other major element evident in the poem is tone variation. All sentences that Pack uses in the development of the poem indicate certain tone variations. At some point, tone varies to high definition while on the other hand it varies to low definition. Tone variation is extremely paramount in the definition of the message that the poem carries. In this case, the author has used tone variation to indicate the surprise that was there as a result of relationship between the frog and the princess. Tone variation is made critical following extensive use of questions that show the level of amazement that the frog and princess relationship pose to the society.
Also, rhyme is evident in the poem. This is a writing style that autos use where different words have similar sounds at the end in a poem or a song. Pack has also used the element in the poem in an extremely critical manner. For example, the second and the third sentences end with the same sound; frame and name. Also, the sixth and the eighth sentences end with the same style these words are wonder and under. This style affirms the aim of the author which is to deliver on the misery-filled poem. Rhyme makes the flow of poem smooth to the anticipated meaning.
The other element that is evident in the poem is word repetition. This is a style where words are repeated by the other to indicate their significance in the poem. For example, the name frog has been used at several instances to indicate the exclusive significance of the frog in the poem. The frog is emphasized through continuous use of the name in the poem to indicate its significance as the main element in the poem. Also the term prince has been used twice to indicate how amazed the author was in finding out that the frog could become a prince.
Robert Pack had extensively used his writing skills through exclusive respect of authorized writing elements to bring forth an exclusively meaningful poem. Through the use of repetition word, rhyme, tone, and resonance, the author has been able to bestow meaning to the poem. It is indeed surprising how a frog would become the princess. In critical analysis of the poem, it may be coined to the rare relationship between people of low status and those of high status. However, Pack has witnessed similar situation, which has been analyzed through exclusive creativity.