The natural law is a theory that has been practiced together with theories of politics, civil law, religious morality theories and theories of ethics. This paper seeks to focus attention on the natural theory of ethics, but in the discussions that follow, a connection with interesting implications for the politics, law and religious morality will be determined. The article has two main goals. First, it seeks to identify the defining traits of natural law theory. Secondly, it focuses on identifying some of the major theoretical possibilities that natural law theorists encounter in formulating a precise opinion within the obstacles set by these defining features.
Natural law and divine providence
While my fundamental focus would be on the status of the natural law as comprising of the principles of practical rationality, consideration should be placed on the importance of Aquinas’s perception. He claimed that natural law is a product of divine providence. The critical thesis stated here by Aquinas is that the natural law is a participation in the permanent law. The eternal principle, for Aquinas, is that a rational strategy by which all creation is centered. It is the natural law that forms the way that humans participate in the everlasting law. While non-rational human beings take part in the natural law only by being determined by it; their activities by default result from their determinate traits, natures the existence of which outcomes from the will of God. Rational beings like us are capable of grasping our share in the everlasting law and freely acting on it. It is this aspect of natural law that justifies on Aquinas’ perception. Aquinas reference of natural law, as a law, is a principle of action established by one who cares for the welfare of the community. While God has care over the universe, it was God’s choice to bring into existence human beings who could operate and use the universe freely. Therefore, in accordance with the principles of reason, it is enough to substantiate our thinking to those rules of reason as law.
Natural law and practical rationality
According to Aquinas, natural law constitutes the basic principles of practical rationality, and human beings have this status out of natural conditions. The belief that the natural law constitutes the fundamental principles of practical rationality implies, for Aquinas, that the edicts of the natural law are universally known by nature. The dictums of the natural law are also known by default. All humans possess a fundamental knowledge of the principles of the natural law. This knowledge is revealed in our essential directedness towards the numerous goods that the natural law directs us to pursue. We could make this inherent awareness explicit and propositional via reflection on practice. Aquinas states that there is a fundamental knowledge that all human beings have, despite the implications of the knowledge being a hard nut to crack, or the efficacy of that knowledge could be thwarted by evil dispositions.
The substance of the natural law view
The central view of Aquinas natural law perceptions as described far concerns what could be termed the metaphysics of morals. Its function is divine providence and the globally authoritative trait of its norms. What about the normative components of Aquinas’s natural law opinion? Does there exist anything distinct on the normative natural law position? At this juncture, it is difficult to state much without stirring controversy, but we could state a sufficient amount concerning Aquinas’s natural law theory to ascertain that it is an inspiring option to utilitarian ethics. Aquinas reiterates that the critical principle of the natural law is that it is ample to be implemented and evil avoided. This is a principle of perspicuity of action-only action that could be understood as conforming with this rule, as implemented under the idea that evil should be avoided and good sought. This could be understood as an intelligible activity. Nevertheless, nobody can simply do an act of good. Instead, one has to pursue some specific good. Aquinas reiterates that we comprehend immediately, by preference, that there exists a variety of factors that qualify to be worthwhile and which can be pursued e.g. reasonable conduct, procreation, society and knowledge.
According to Aquinas, it is the good that is crucial regardless of whether an action, or a kind of action, is logically posterior to whether the action motivates some good. The good is prior to the right. Nevertheless, on Aquinas’ view, we are, in some way, able to make judgments using those principles, concerning the guidelines for good actions, and the manner in which the good could be achieved. His thoughts are founded on the following lines: first, there exists certain methods of acting in response to the fundamental human goods that are essentially flawed. Secondly, for an action to be termed as right, or sound, is for it to be an act that is not flawed.
Natural law and Christianity
Christian morality is founded in the Bible and the doctrines of the church, rather than the unassisted human reason. Nevertheless, Aquinas and other philosophers argued that the human being reason could present a logical root for those moral guides that were passed through revelation. They could also be used to apply a logical foundation for those moral edicts that were also known via revelation, and could be used to practice Christian precepts. This proved a specifically worthwhile approach for those moral scenarios, which were not known in Biblical times The natural law practice is dominant in the catholic moral thinking, but was opposed by the Protestants. The protestant thinkers saw no human reason as “fallen” and thereby unable to offer a sound basis for moral rules.
The doctrine of natural law comprises of a particular subset of the larger question of the place of reason in ethics. Its adherents tend to be the Roman Catholic, but not always so. Its meaning is anything but unproblematic and obvious. In spite of having been subject to wave after wave of criticism in the history of philosophy and theology, natural law continues to appeal to those who believe that ethics should be grounded in the moral life and being. Theological ethics is drawn to natural law for two fundamental reasons: first; it advances a form of moral realism. Secondly, some ethics are attracted to natural law for its universal scope and its claim to apply to all human beings. The underlying argument of natural law is that all human beings are equal, regardless of whether rich or poor, conqueror, or the conquered, men as well as women.
Works Cited
Braybrooke, David. Natural law modernized. Toronto: University of toronto press, 2008.
Dewar, john. International project finance : law and practice. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2004.
Fredrich, Georg and John Silber. Natural law : the scientific ways of treating natural law, its place in moral philosophy, and its relation to the positive sciences of law. Philadelphia: University of Pennyslvania, 2003.
George, Robert. Natural law theory : contemporary essays. Oxford: Clarendon, 2003.
Kaina, howard. The natural law theory of ethics. Chicago: open court, 2004.
Olson, Grant. Buddhadhamma : natural laws and values for life. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.
Passerin, allessandro. Natural law : an introduction to legal philosophy. New Brunswick: transaction publishers, 2005.
