Example Of Thesis Proposal On What Statement Is The Play Making About Revengeis Revenge Ever Acceptable,Even

1. A draft of the opening paragraph. Revenge is a menacing force driven by the dark section of an individual. So hard to control, revenge results in atrocious actions. When a person seeks such an action, he has to acknowledge getting back the same consequences; in other means, he has to be ready to dig two graves. William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, conveys how revenge can lead to the ultimate destruction of a person’s life and causing a never-ending chaos. As well as, it portrays how it results in the devastation of not only the revenge-seeker, but the community around him as well. Despite the fact that Hamlet's revenge is undoubtedly valid as no actual law can help the Prince to punish the uncle, who has become a king, it can hardly be considered an act pleasing to human morality. Considering the difficult question of the relationship between revenge and justice, Shakespeare involves fatal actions. Shakespeare illustrates this theme through the struggles of characters and their misleading actions. He depicts how Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras pursue revenge yet gain nothing but death and sorrow. The protagonist does what he has to, yet he is doomed and destroyed, and similarly, all those he loves or hates are doomed. In “Hamlet,” the problematic nature of revenge is embodied not in discourse about what is moral or immoral, but in three specific dramatic situations that transfer the idea of destructive consequences of vengeance as justified or blind it does not bring peace both internal and external.
2. The main points for arguments.
A. Shakespeare’s innovation to the tragedy of revenge is in showing not only an external but internal conflict causing by it.
- A thoughtful protagonist reveals different sides of the concept of revenge.
- After learning of his father death, a hasty marriage of his mother, the ghost’s story, Hamlet makes a tragic discovery about the imperfection of the world.
- Hamlet’s thoughts rushes in many different directions and the hesitations of his inner world are in unpredictable motion. It is not enough to say that his soul splits, but it is divided into many pieces.
B. Only in the good old days, revenge was a good form to restore justice, and now, when the evil has spread, it does not solve anything. To confirm this idea, Shakespeare poses in face of the problem of revenge for the death of the father three characters: Hamlet, Fortinbras, and Laertes.
- Laertes acts without thinking, sweeping away both who are right or wrong.
- Fortinbras, on the contrary, renounces revenge.
- Hamlet puts the solution to this problem in depending on the general ideas about the world and its laws.
C. The image of Hamlet stands for fatal consequences that each character has prepared for oneself, revenging, or of refraining from revenge and forgiving instead. Heroes of tragedy die ironically:
- Laertes - by the sword, which he has smeared with poison to kill Hamlet under the guise of an honest fight;
- King - by the same sword (his proposition that it should be sharp, unlike Hamlet's sword, and poisoned);
- Queen Gertrude drinks poison by mistake, as she errors in trusting King;