Example Of What If Arguments Before The Supreme Court Were Televised Essay

2) How wide an audience do you believe the television proceedings of the Supreme Court would have?
It is likely that the scope of audience attracted would depend on the case currently being televised. As with many genres of television, the more dramatic cases are bound to attract wider audiences. For example, a case which has already attracted media attention, such as that of a serial killer, will probably be more widely viewed than a large fraud case which has, so far, gone mostly unnoticed in the public eye. Nevertheless, I believe that all cases would attract viewers, certainly for a time after the court was first broadcast. There would be a certain degree of novelty to it and the media may hype it up, attracting people to watch. However, it would be interesting to see how the public interest in court cases wavered after the first year or two.
3) Do you think that televised proceedings of the Supreme Court would significantly increase public awareness of supreme court decisions? Why or Why not?
Televised proceedings of the Supreme Court may increase public awareness of decisions, but not significantly. After all, the final outcome of cases are made public knowledge after they are closed, already. If public awareness were increased, it would more likely be over the processes which the Supreme Court goes through in order to reach a decision. Furthermore, launching televised cases may well make the officials involved feel on display and would undoubtedly affect their performance in court. As a result of this, a defendant’s experience could be changed. Any factor which causes the court environment to be less impartial cannot be a positive one.