Report Critique Discussion
The group presentation on the topic of anaerobic digestion specifically provides a good source of information especially for those who might have no knowledge at all of the issue being presented in the discussion. The diagrams they used were really helpful in making a visual distinction on the more technical aspects of the report. These diagrams and tables provide good data that helps out the audience to know more about the matter being discussed and become more involved in understanding it thoroughly. The chronological arrangement of the different parts of the discussion helps a lot in organizing the process of discussing the different elements of anaerobic digestion. However, it would have been better if the summary section of the report provide at least five points of focal concerns that could identify the most important factors that make up the research, thus increasing its value for practical study reference. Hydraulic Fracturing “Fracking”
The simplicity of the approach of this report could be given commendation. The concise description of the different elements that make up the distinct definition of Hydraulic fracturing makes this report easy to relate to and easy to understand. Nevertheless, it would have helped if a few more images and diagrams were utilized to describe or visually define the conditions of operations that are involved in Hydraulic Fracturing. What constitutes a good report is its capacity to engage the readers and/or audiences into the discussion. Overall, this report was able to accomplish such aspect of interest-capturing value that it could be considered effective enough in presenting the topic that it is supposed to give attention to. Working towards becoming more engaging through visual aids would actually make this report an excellent presentation.
