Free Case Study About Abet Ethics

The global society embarks a large portion of its economy on the level of productivity initiated by industries, factories and manufacturing companies that employ several engineers to run the power plants. Information denotes that these are entities, which employs a large global population to enhance their ability to manufacture the final products. Critically, the entities require trained personnel to handle the material and machines in a professional and ethical approach securing the globe from side effects manipulated by the role of productivity (Davis et al, 40). Critically, sources assert that coal is an important product, which is, used to accelerate several activities in companies. It is evident that its combustion embraces production of harmful gases. Research asserts that an approximate of 10% among the giant organizations has not emulated the set policies to secure the globe from severe global warming among other outlays. In the first place, sources assert that it is prone to the production of carbon dioxide in a wide range where the gas is exposed to the atmosphere manipulating global warming.
Sources assert that such effect touches every organism, which lives on earth in the sense that it leads to its harm. In the first place, it leads to drying and weathering of the plants due to excessive warm (Bucciarelli, 143). Further, it initiates several diseases to the human phenomenon embracing high mortality rate; hence, reducing the population. Such an effect lays a negative approach to the economy in where those who die eliminate a resource whose application would endorse prosperity of their respective specializations. Further, the combustion leads to the production of other harmful gases for instance, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. In a more critical review, when sulphur dioxide mixes with the humid in the atmosphere it inciting to the establishment of sulphuric acid which impose a negative impact to the people through skin burn among other challenges. The study will engage an effective analysis and investigation of ethical and unethical approaches, which were applied, in the case spurring Dr Simpson’s firm towards acquisition of the tender.
Critically, the citizens stood on the safe side where they opposed the project to manipulate an effective environment through the prevention of harmful emission. Critically, they initiated an ethical approach where they minded on the society’s welfare (Colby, Anne, and William, 334). On the contrary, they engage the character without the realization that the project is set to merit the community where they would benefit a good living from the project. Further, they forgot that it would manipulate more employment opportunities to the community; hence, incite development and elimination of poverty. Critically, the environment group acted unethical in their character where they did not inform the community on the respective alternative which would supplement the proposed mechanism; hence, merit the society.
The study asserts that the environmental group endorsed Dr Burn to the wrong corner in an unethical character where they denied that their respective approach would not enhance climate change. Critically, such a statement established their hope and gave them solidarity to stand by the argument. It is evident that it would be ethical if they advised him to engage a different option, for instance, the use of wind or solar applications (Bucciarelli, 146). Further, the environmental group dubbed the climate skeptics where such an effect enhanced their chance to lose the tender in the sense that it promoted more environmental pollution.
Evidently, Dr Burn’s lawyer admitted misrepresentation when he ratified Son’s argument. They said that it was right for Burns to assume the task if their method would eliminate all the other emissions and emit carbon dioxide. Critically, this was Son’s strategic plan to defeat Dr Burns in the bid. They knew that such an aspect would accrue their failure; hence, win an opportunity to assume the task (Colby, Anne, and William, 332). Critically, the legal concept of the lawyer indicates that they should operate in confidentiality way without influence from any person. Therefore, he played a major part in disqualifying Dr Burns. In second perspective, Dr Burns also engage an unethical character in the aspect of assuming the duty where it is evident that they knew the effects associated with their model. Critically, the character, which attracted their failure, entails the aspect that they did not accept it to change to an alternative. Such behaviour embraced dishonesty and indeed lowered their professional dignity. It is evident that they understood the effect of carbon dioxide emission initiates global warming, and it would have been right if they ratified that and change. Information asserts that the role of eliminating carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is high as compared to elimination of other coal emissions.
In a different perspective, the CLS argue in a very contrasting character where the Sons support the application of renewable sources to run the CCS project. Critically, the aspect indicates that CLS is unethical because they enforce the use of a mechanism, which embrace release of carbon dioxide. It is evident that the increase of electricity would help spur the project where even though the use of electricity is costly (Davis et al, 42). Information asserts that the use of their mechanism in the project would hurt everybody in the globe where they deny such an effect, which is unethical.
Recommendation
Critically, it is important for an organization to engage an effective role in truth where transparency and possibility of ideas is prioritized. Critically, Dr Burns failed in this aspect where it was very difficult for him to spur the opportunity and achieve the bid. Information asserts that the implementation of such ethic would consider the global society where they are part of it. Critically, their character is very unethical because they only considered meriting the task without catering the globe. Therefore, it was right for them to accept their condition and engage diversity in the project. Dr Burn’s lawyer played an unethical role in the process where he did not consider the critical application of their model. Critically, he should have asked questions on the effects associated with the model in order to advice them on the respective approach, which should be applied to achieve the opportunity (Bucciarelli, 145). The fact that he did not have technological knowledge towards the situation was unethical in the sense that he was supposed to represent them in truth. Critically, if they could win the bid the lawyer would be liable to the effects, which their model would initiate towards the environment. In a more critical review, the environment group is initiating a role, which interferes with the global environment; hence, undermining human health and the health of other organisms in the society. Critically, it should operate in an ethical concept embracing ideas, which invite safety to the entire society. Critically, they should embrace transparency and follow the respective procedures and rules necessary to meet the project in a mechanism, which will not hurt any person. Critically, their action indicates signs of corruption where they ratified that Dr Burn have adequate competence to assume the task while in the real sense they are not.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the law took its stand where it allowed the Sons to engage the task because their approaches are very transparent. In the first place, they recognize that the cost of eliminating carbon dioxide is high. The aspect endorses them to seek possible alternatives to supplement the aspect of burning coal, which initiates large amounts of carbon dioxide (Relman, 2669). Evidently, they embrace the use of solar power to generate the carbon capture sequestration, which accelerate the CCS pilot project. Further, their lawyer sought the truth about the matter where he stood firm to represent their argument and assisted the community shun the effective outlay which would be initiated by coal combustion. Critically, Dr Burn should emulate such a mechanism embracing ideas, which benefit the entire community.
Work cited
Bucciarelli, Louis L. "Ethics and engineering education." European Journal of Engineering Education 33.2 (2008): 141-149.
Colby, Anne, and William M. Sullivan. "Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education." Journal of Engineering Education 97.3 (2008): 327-338.
Davis, Denny, et al. "Assessments for three performance areas in capstone engineering design." American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2007.
Relman, Arnold S. "Medical professionalism in a commercialized health care market." Jama 298.22 (2007): 2668-2670.
Schinzinger, Roland. "Introduction to engineering ethics." (2000).