Free Case Study About Criminal Laws On Drug Felony

How, according to Michelle Alexander, has the American Supreme Court “eviscerated” the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures? What examples does she give? CH2
According to Alexander, the American Supreme Court has eviscerated the Fourth Amendment due to the adoption of spatiality in the war against drugs. Alexander reiterates the evisceration of the Fourth Amendment due to legal espionages and conspiracies in the war against drugs where the war is inclined on racial lines. For example, Alexander attributes this practice to the incidences of stop-and –frisk operations, especially in the poor communities. Other examples presented by Alexander to signify this refers to the arbitrary and discriminatory police practices, and unfortunately, these efforts seem to target the black and brown population. Therefore, the fourth amendment has been applied with racial lens, and only targets certain races or regions based on their social and economic standings.
According to Alexander, what demographic is the most likely to be guilty of drug possession and sales? How is this data at odds with the way the mainstream media depicts drug users and drug dealers? CH3
Alexander reiterates that the guilty demographic for drug-related felony are the drug kingpins and violet offenders. However, this narrative is disputed with the current statistic that labels drug offenders on possession, rather than getting to the root cause of the matter. In fact, Alexander gives a justifiable statistics linking close to 80% of drug arrests to possession of marijuana. This is quite controversial of the actual truth, since the convicted individuals have no history of violence or any major selling activity. Thus, the war against drugs has been misrepresented to involve individuals with no apparent drug history, but is merely held liable for possessing marijuana, which is a mild drug compared to tobacco or alcohol. It’s unfortunate that the media has depicted lesser criminals to be the mastermind behind drug-related felony, while missing off the target.
What are examples of how the judicial system and/or police profiling are allowed to actively or passively discriminate against people of color in general and African Americans in particular, according to Alexander? CH3
The police have been involved in an active discrimination to the people of color when it comes to the war on drugs. In the first instance, police officers have arbitrary arrested perceived drug offenders and instituted charges that unfairly target them. For example, charges of possessing marijuana have been misinterpreted to mean sales and distribution. In addition, the judicial systems have contributed to this endless chain of drug offense against people of color since they do not give a fair hearing to less-privileged offenders in the society. In as much as these statements might be considered to be valid, felony on drug should be treated with a lot of seriousness, and it must be expedited regardless or color or race. No sympathy should be accorded to a person due to his or her minority status.