Computer ethics has a very important professional responsibility of serving the public interest as well as welfare to further improve the understanding public of the science of computers. Computer ethics should therefore take personal responsibility in maintaining high standards of integrity, honesty, and due diligence in the way they conduct education, research, and other professional duties. They should also be concerned with the condition of health and safety relating to the consumers, co-workers, and the community. Intellectual property is defined as original expressions of symbols, as well as words and ideas that represent the services or products of a person or company. Here, the expertise of computer ethics is necessary in matters relating to public health and safety (Bynum & Rogerson, 2006).
Similarly, it is vital to avail considered comments relating to the general public in general on matters that involve computer application (Bynum & Rogerson, 2006). Computer ethics in the George Freestuff case need to be in their best positions to not only decipher but also communicate all complex matters of computer ethics to the general public. It is clear that honoring the commitments that are made in contexts of fulfilling professional duties is also a matter of importance. The George Freestuff case also needs to establish and maintain thorough lines of communication across the professional and academic communities. This aspect aims at generating favorable opportunities to appropriately develop collaborations on educational and research.
Understanding the meaning and implication of intellectual property is the first step towards enhancing its security and safety. Furthermore, it is more beneficial that the competence of the operators in the field seeks to develop programs, projects and surveys of ethical behavior restoration. Some of the ways through which this can be achieved include providing technical assistance and relevant advice to enable the preservation of the cultural framework (Bynum & Rogerson, 2006). Preparing technical reports on computer behavior excludes any judgment of the market value to develop adequate programs and teach on computer conduct effectiveness. It is also crucial that information is disseminated to gain efficiency in its availability to the intended users while at the same time upholding its safety and security. Therefore, promoting deeper understandings of the areas of behavior conservation and restoration is of paramount importance.
In upholding the value of intellectual property, balances between computer ethics and the humanities is an indispensable topic for theoretical instruction. Here, the theoretical subjects are determined by the levels of specialization in the areas of behavior conservation and restoration. According to the George Freestuff case, this covers issues of ethical principles of behavior conservation and restoration, history of techniques and materials, manufacturing and technology processes as well as the identification and study of the processes of deterioration. Computer ethics in this case should display as well as transport all aspects of intellectual property. At this point, it is important to take note of the theories, techniques and methods of conservation which are drawn from preventive security conservation and restoration (Bynum & Rogerson, 2006).
Further, the processes that are involved in developing reproductions of objects, methods of documentation and history of intellectual property conservation are very influential aspects in decision making. Legal issues have a fundamentally very impactful effect on the overall approach to protecting intellectual property. The main dimensions of legal influences include professional cultural heritage law, statutes, insurance, and tax and business law. Other variances in this case include management (including collections, staff and resources) health and safety (such as environmental issues) and communication skills (for instance, information technology).
Reference:
Bynum, T. W., & Rogerson, S. (2006). Computer ethics and professional responsibility. Malden, MA [etc.: Blackwell Publishing.
