Forum 1
Human rights are always respected at all cost and that is a human need. But there are instances where this policy ceases especially when violation comes in. Like in instances of genocide, it is obvious that respect for human rights is never there and in its place reigns disregarded of this fundamental right. In cases like this, it is obvious that the sovereignty of a country is never respected for the sake of the citizens who are subjected to the genocide. It is therefore thought that such interventions are not unacceptable assault on any gi9ven state but rater constructive intervention to put to a stop imminent danger.Humanitarian intervention on a sovereign state is a rather contentious issue among many states at least since the cold war. The legality of such an action has drawn many reactions from different schools of thought but the eminent issue here is that, at least the murder or killing of innocent people is at least reason enough to intervene. It is wise to stop grave violations of any fundamental human right even if it means using force just to give life the dignity that it deserves (Jentleson 2010).Interventions like these which seek to bring sanity to a warring nation needs no consent of that government to stop genocide because if it were within the powers of that country then it should have stopped the genocide and because it has not, then it is okay if other nations intervene. A country is supposed to protect its citizens from danger and if a country fails to do so, then other nations of the world can go to any length to ensure that people are protected no matter what it takes. If there is infringement of the fundamental human rights then it leaves no doubt that human rights intervention is appropriate. I believe that intervention is very appropriate and should be used just for the sake of saving lives.
Forum 2
On one hand the world seeks to integrate it is of great importance to acknowledge the fact that this has been made possible because this has been happening for some time now. This is so because of the desire for human connectivity through exchange of products, ideas and every other aspect that characterizes culture. Since time immemorial, this has been a major cause that man has taken in the quest to unite the world as a global village. The United States of America has been at the fore front to ensure that this happens as it has greatly contributed to this cause. This has benefited most nations of the world because at least some success has been achieved. It can therefore be viewed from the positive side in as much as there are a few negative effects. In a nutshell, globalization is good because it has been beneficial to not only America, but the world at large. For instance with the rise of China, the influence it has to the rest of the world in regard to globalization and the influence that America has on the global platform gives an insight on how the world is influenced by these influential nations.Globalization has changed the world in so many good ways that it deserves credit. Just as the US has played a very important role in all this so are another nations despite the fact that the US takes credit for all that is happening. All factors lay constant, it is for a fact that globalization is good and the US can be credited for all that has happened in regard to it just as other regimes as well as global governance as seen through (Jentleson 2010).
According to Jacob Diamond and Sabine Nehme, humanitarian intervention in such instances as genocide is justifiable. This is so because genocide acts are brutal and against fundamental human rights. Jacob Diamond thinks that it does not matter whether the country is sovereign or not, when such happens, other countries should rise in arms to try and stop it. Sabine Nehme also thinks that genocide should not expand while other countries sit and watch. I strongly support their ideologies as they uphold the idea of human care and concern for others who are under suppression. Genocide should therefore be stopped at all costs.
