Free Design Evaluation Case Study Example

The process of System Engineering encompasses different elements and aspects. One of the significant aspects of system engineering processes is the design optimization. There are various designs that contribute to the functioning and continual progress of the system engineering processes. Design and design evaluation are elemental under the design optimization of the system engineering process. Faulty design systems can lead to failure of engineering systems and processes. The faulty designs will affect the entire flow of the engineering system.
The engineering systems could fail because of faulty designs in various ways. Faulty designs are those that lack one or more elemental features of that design. As such, the missing features of that design create loops or faults in the system leading to its failure. Design integration is a significant step in engineering systems. This step encompasses certain features that are significant in meeting the end goal of the engineering process. That goal is to enable every specialized component or area to be in aligned context with other components and to accept the design inputs from other steps of the engineering process. These key features include teaming, outsourcing, communication, data formats, and techniques of analysis, common tools and the location. The absence of one or more of these key elements could lead to failure of an engineering process in various ways.
Firstly, the absence of one or more of the key features will slow down the growth and progress of the design and the engineering process and system. Many engineering systems start small and grow as a design system spec develops. Therefore, if features like common tools and data format are missing, the progress of the engineering system slows down leading to failure. The missing of the key features will act as an obstacle to the incorporation of the design specialists to the system. For instance, if proper communication is missing, it is difficult for the design specialists to cover various aspects of the system design and varied requirements because there is insufficient communication. As such, the system can easily fail because of misinterpretation and misunderstanding of crucial information because of poor or absence of communication techniques. If features like outsourcing and teaming are missing, it will be difficult to meet the organizational requirements to have the design specialists in all components to integrate their expertise by working together. As such, channelization, diversification and sharing of ideas lacks in the process leading to failure of the engineering system.
Following the system engineering process to the latter does not always guarantee that the system will not fail. That is; a system engineering process can have proper design integration and system test evaluation techniques but still fail. These failures could surface because of other factors not addressed in the test and evaluation system. For instance, the failure could occur when the use of a device or structure exceeds the design limits, inhibiting proper functioning of that device or structure. That is if the design of a device or structure allows it to support a specific amount of strain, and the users apply greater amounts, the structures and devices or systems begin deforming and consequently fail. Other contributing factors of failure that could surface outside the system engineering process include financial costs and improper use. Therefore, engineering could still fail despite following the system engineering process.