Free Essay About BP And Deepwater Horizon Disaster Of 2010

Through the discussion of this case analysis we were able to enrich our learning experience. Working with this case has been very different compared to the individual case analysis. In contrast to Zappos, which was a success story, the case study on the BP and Deepwater Horizon Disaster of 2010 shows the negative dimensions and impacts that a mislead and contradictory organization can impose. The most important lesson that can be learned is how in order to be authentic, effective and ultimately successful; companies need to align every little component of their organizational set up. A crucial aspect for this is leadership behavior. Management needs to act as a role model for the behaviors it wishes to see. Second, BP is a negative example of a company that does not learn by its mistakes. All in all, this case study has inspired us to be receptive for and sensitive of inconsistent and contradictory organizations that lead to inefficient and problem causing cultures. We can use this insight in our future job positions and thereby having a sustainable and value adding impact for a company.
BP acts as a negative example for a company whose strong culture is the cause for poor performance which not only affects the company itself but also various stakeholders as shown with the Deepwater Horizon rig. This behavior is characteristic for BP and arose at several incidents. It has been shown that BP is a company which does not act according to its statements. In other words, its statements do not represent BP’s real and deeply held assumptions; and is therefore not supported by its artifacts in the form of structure, incentive systems, and general organizational setup. It needs to be recognized that it is culture which mainly is important for the manner in which an organization is successful or unsuccessful and that culture therefore needs to be created and nurtured consciously.