Many communities and societies exist today but the one that I am acquainted with most is my class. I am currently in college and the school is a grouping of people from all walks of life. My class exhibits a divergent assemblage of individuals from different ethnics, races, political, age, social and economic backgrounds. However, despite this diversity, life has perfectly been well and the differences have ultimately been neutralized.
In “Arts of the Contact Zone” Mary Louis Pratt brings forth an argument about a “community” and a “contact zone”. The word community is quite a common phrase and according to Pratt, the society’s idea of community is “strongly utopian, embodying values like equality, fraternity liberty which the societies often profess but systematically fail to realize” ((Pratt, 493). In regards to a contact zone, Pratt argues that the idea of a contact zone is envisioned in part to compare with philosophies of community that motivate much of the reasoning behind language, culture and communication. In my class, a single language is used for communication thus easing the communication process and increases the authentication and value of messages put across by colleagues and instructors (Pratt, 497).
Pratt contends that community is an imagined and an idealized construction. This is because it has an assumed unity that instead of liberating marginalized voices suppresses them. In regard to Pratt’s point of view, my classroom can be considered a community but can also be considered as a contact zone at the same time. My class is a community because everybody is there for a similar reason. Everyone in the classroom experiences similar surroundings and the professor or the lecturer teaches the same ideas to the entire class. Additionally, everyone in the class has an equal chance of grabbing the concepts being put across. The instructor treats everyone equally with no favoritism whatsoever.
As mentioned earlier, my class boasts of members from a diverse range of cultural backgrounds. From Caucasians, African Americans, Latinos, Asians and Native Americans, my class seems to have it all. As such, one would think that getting along would be a daunting task and there is no way that we would ever get along and the word community would not apply. However, with time, things changed and we were all integrated into the system and fitted so well. Unity and harmony prevailed thereafter. The irrational mania with reputation becomes less apparent when we focus on our roles and responsibilities (Pratt, 478). We make the class our first primacy and it starts resembling a community.
Things were quite rocky at the beginning when we first joined up but over time, things have only gotten better. For instance, most of us did not know each other on a personal level. Our diverse range of backgrounds only aggravated the situation. We also took quite a lot of time to understand and get used to our professors. However, one we got used to each other and our professor, everything started to become quite smooth and this has been the trend for quite some time now. These days, entering into the classroom is like entering into a small mini world. The class offers some form of a “safe house”. Pratt defines a safe house as a place where “groups can constitute themselves as horizontal, homogenous, sovereign communities with high degrees of trust, shared misunderstandings, temporary protection from legacies of oppression” (Pratt, 489).
During classroom sessions, we are all able to escape the expectations of the general social word. In this confined environment, we consider as our “safe house”, we can talk to anyone without regards to our many differences. Every single student has at least something in common with the others. We are in the same class, we complete similar assignments and we are treated in a similar way. In our class sessions, it is common for the professor to assign us group assignments. Sometimes the professor arranges us in a set of groups while in other instances, we are told to arrange ourselves in compatible groups. It is in such instances that the definition of “community” finds massive application (Pratt, 494). During such cases, we are able to assemble our strengths and weaknesses and make them work together so as to get the project done in the best way possible and make sure that everyone gets the best marks possible. Those whose are considerably weak in some disciplines are easily assisted to improve due to the high free interaction that exists in our classroom. We have learnt to develop a high sense of brotherhood.
However, the above description is what Ben Anderson would call an “imagined community” which is in real sense a contact zone. The single most thing that qualifies our classroom to be a contact zone is our diverse backgrounds. In addition, everyone in the class is different, whether cognitively or physically. We share the common goal of getting education and passing our exams. However, this does not curtain the fact that we are different. This is just in terms of our differing ethnicities but also because of the different cliques and personalities that we share.
According to Pratt, a contact zone is also used “to refer to social spaces where cultures meet, clash, and grapple with each other, often in contexts of highly asymmetrical relations of power, such as colonialism, slavery or their aftermaths as they lived out in many part of the world today”( (Pratt, 499). Even though we shared many traits and ideas, we would never actually be the same 100%. As Pratt argues, there is a need for us to develop methods of comprehending or even noticing the intellectual and the social spaces that are not unified, homogenous so as to develop ways of valuing and even tolerating differences.
I think our class is more of contact zone rather than a community. For instance, a debate on the issue of racism once sprung up in our class. The question was whether racism still exists in the contemporary society. Everyone agreed that racism was indeed still rampant in the society but what got the debate going was when an aspect of stereotyping was introduced. One person suggested that black people are naturally more arrogant and loud. The opinion of the class was divided right at the middle with the black students vehemently opposing this statement while most of the Caucasian students buttressed the statement. At this time, the notion of a community did not seem to exist and everyone had a differing opinion. This scenario reinforces Pratt’s assertion that there is a need for us to move away from this “utopian community” that we tend to create in our minds and deal with this exacting reality of a “contact zone”. Until the public is able to do this, cultures will not cease clashing as a “contact zone”. This hugely applies to our class. Additionally, all provisions are shared equally, no hatred and no one does harm to the others. We generally have no bad feelings towards each other but we live a simple life.
It seems that we have been blinded by this “utopian fantasy” where we think that simply because we get along in class, share similar goals and are taught similar ideas, we are essentially a community. However, as seen in the aforementioned debate, some unspoken issues need to be addressed before we can consider ourselves a community. The utopian fantasy where a society generally disregards and lives without realizing the wide variety of differences or problems that need to be addressed is destructive (Pratt, 489). What’s even more worrying is that people are aware of it but tend to ignore it.
The above depiction indicates that our class is not perfect. I think the most appropriate thing to do would be to consider our class as both a community and a contact zone. It is the same teachers or professors who equip us with similar knowledge and ideas since we share a common goal. This does not however eliminate the deep differences within us as shown earlier. Although we may exhibit similar traits and characteristics outwards, we can never really be the same this and me is what qualifies the class to be a contact zone (Pratt, 478).
I however think that the class elucidated above is like many others in the society today. In the age of globalizations, many societies brag of harboring individuals from different ethnic, cultural, religious and even cultural backgrounds. It is however very advisable to heed Pratt’s suggestions and realize that there are some differences that will always exist between us and we are therefore a contact zone. However, the existing differences and factors that hinder our social interaction should not hinder our cooperation. As a class, we continue being united and harmonized.
Works Cited
Pratt, Mary Louise. “Arts of the Contact Zone.” Profession 91 (1991): 33-40. Web.
Pratt, Mary L. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge, 1992. Print.
