Free Essay About Alternative For The Radioactive Materials

The main arguments and or thesis that the author is trying to convey or convince of me is that there is a very high risk that comes to be of hazard to the environment and the biodiversity that comes from the radioactive wastes. On one side , the pros that comes as a result of the production of nuclear power and the use of nuclear energy and products looks very lucrative and this makes the discussions about the risk involved when investing on this area to be generally risky. There are a number of strategies that have also been put into action in order to curb the main risks and the cons that comes out because of the nuclear energy. Thus, this has made it quite controversial when doing a general assessment of the short term and the long term effects that may come from such investments.
The premises, logic and the evidence presented for the justification of the nuclear energy is not convincing. The author asserts that the prominent options that exist for the handling of the high-level radioactive materials. the reasons why this argument is not persuasive is because the cons that come as a result of the radioactive materials are so much adverse and hazardous to the general environment . The long term effects of the radioactive materials cannot be compared to the pros that we may see in the present since they are there to bring an everlasting negative impacts to the general environment. However, the point that I find convincing in the text is the idea of the storage of the wastes in the onsite cooling pools.
The implications of the argument is that even though there is a very high risk that is always involved in the nuclear energy sector and the use of the highly radioactive materials. The argument draws out that there are various strategies that have been used bring a solution to the challenge of the radioactive wastes the nuclear materials. The most effective method that comes because of the argument is the dry cask storage. This method has been found to have a good safety record but found to be quite expensive. The second and most favorable and cheaper option is the recycling and reprocessing of the used fuel and the used radioactive materials. Thaw author asserts “as promising at that sounds, reprocessing is not only incredibly expensive but also more significantly it produces a plutonium isotope that can be used in nuclear weapons.”(Environment and Society, pg. 211).
The question that can be asked from the reading is that” could there be better methods that can be used as an alternative for the radioactive materials and nuclear energy? Are there better policies that can be formulated as a means to curb the effects that has often resulted from the radio-active materials”
The areas that I did not understand how the contribution of the political class to the effects of the radioactivity and production of nuclear energy. It is also always very difficult to understand the reason why there is a continual increase in the investment of the radioactive materials and nuclear energy not only to the developed nations but also to the developing economies. In addition, there current storage strategies in the long run must run out of space or can be very fatal in case of an accident.