Free Essay About Political Science S

3. Can authoritarian rule be legitimate? Why or why not? Should all people be under democracy? What are the possible benefits and potential dangers that result from promoting this goal?
Authoritarian is a government characterized by constrain to political organizations and constrains to anti-regime demonstrations by the public. The concept of political legitimacy lies within the framework of Political Science. Political legitimacy is an indistinct term since some theorist claim that legitimacy is a process of superior framework while others argue that a legitimate system must have defenses such as liberty, equality, equity, and collective bargaining for all people.
The legitimacy of a government is subjective since it depends on the public view in a country on how they feel whether the government is legitimate and responds to their needs. The democratic government gets to the office because of the vote of the electorate while an authoritarian government seizes and retains the power without the vote of the electorate. The Western view explains that democracy as the basis of legitimate government since there are public participation and the observance of human rights. Those who oppose this view cite that rightful holding of power has no restrictions to democratic ideals. A violent authoritarian government is legitimate when the public believes so. Democracy regimes have better education systems, good health indicators, fewer instances of murder by the government, freedom of the press to criticize the government, less military disputes, political stability, and low instances of refugees in the country compared to authoritarian regimes. Most democracies have income inequalities that translate to a wide gap between the haves and have-nots. Additionally democratic regimes can suffer famine as well as instances of terrorism.
In conclusion, many people believe that democratic regimes are legitimate while this paper contends that the legitimacy depends on the support and beliefs of the people towards the government. There are tendencies of certain political systems that can influence people’s view to consider them as being legitimate. One cannot contend than an institution is legitimate by looking at the political system and using bias views from the West. Legitimacy depends on the people and, in this case, it is possible for authoritarian regimes to have the view of the legitimacy.
4. Why was Communism unable to provide the benefits that it promised in theory? Do the flaws appear due to this line of thinking, or did those in power misapply its principles?
Karl Marx theory contends in creating equality and unity to eliminate class struggles and realize the advancement of economic development. Communism in Russia and China has realized limited success by them applying this framework. The theory of Communism has inherent flaws coupled by the communist leaders abusing power.
Communism in China promised to realign human relations by ensuring political and economic reforms to create equality. Proponents of this theory cited that Religion bred an inequality by promising people rewards in their afterlife. Mao Zedong cited that by applying Communism, there would be gender equality, national and ethnic identities would change the elimination of the institution of marriage, and the promotion of harmony by destroying nationalism. The Communist political systems in china promised to absorb markets and unemployment, competition, people’s individual profit, and bankruptcy. The government sought to provide public goods such as education and healthcare by providing these services equally for all.
Russia established the Communist regime in 1917 by Lenin. Lenin succeeded in driving out an entire generation that was indispensable. This hurt the intellectuals in the country, cultural substance, and the economic development. The concept of Communism application is agriculture brought a calamity since this move was ill timed. Russia suffered famine and due to the collapse in the agricultural sector. Russian Communism devolves into perpetration of murder by Stalin. Most of the Communist leaders in Russia such as Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin are gang leaders who operate in militia groups. These groups seize power to pursue their own interest such as murdering other gangs. The leaders in Russia contend that the Marxist ideology has a period of civil and international conflict that is essential before the emergence of a victorious system.
In conclusion, Communism is not a viable option to counter the capitalism structure since it is an unworkable system of societal condition. Communism in practice was unable to provide the benefits it promised in theory. After the fall of the Soviet Union, most of the countries abandoned the Communist rule. The People’s Republic of China still adopts the Communist system in the 21st century. The country has reassessed most of the policies reiterated by the legacy of Mao Zedong. China has managed to reduce state control to realize growth in the economy and a reduction in the rate of poverty.