The distinct nature of the family formation, religion, and urban developments in the Chesapeake Colonies compared to the rest of the New England region played a key role in stimulating witch scares within Virginia, as well as quelling uprisings such as Bacon’s Rebellion. The Dominion of Virginia was largely characterized by underdeveloped towns and cities coupled with an unstable nuclear family structure. This created vulnerability for chaos rising against figures of power like Governor William Berkeley. In contrast, a solidified familial system along with an established religious presence in other regions of New England gave rise to social stability, conversely leading to no major outcries or witchcraft panics or rebellions similar to Bacon’s.
Apart from faith and a lack of a strong family structure, the Chesapeake Colonies were unique in comparison to other New England regions due to their secular economic pursuits and high mortality rate. This led to an absence of religious motivation – and, consequently, no witchcraft scares. Another reason for rare witchcraft scares cases was that the colony was predominantly male-populated, with an untypically low number of women. The colonists’ prime focus for coming over from Europe laid heavily on amassing wealth through monetary gain, such as making enslaved Black people work on tobacco plantations. This contrasted heavily with New England’s strong religious motivations that put faith higher than money.
The establishment of a stable family formation in New England provided an advantageous and prosperous environment and social stability for lower-class citizens. Consequently, even with religious motivations involved, it promoted economic growth potential that likely deterred any uprisings similar to Bacon’s Rebellion. Also, each son or daughter in New England had access to enough land providing them with actual independence and potential opportunities. In contrast, Virginia suffered from limited land availability due to numerous unchecked laborers and indentured servants. The land Virginians needed so badly belonged to Native American tribes. Altogether, these circumstances caused conditions ripe for civil unrest in the Chesapeake Colonies, such as Bacon’s rebellion.
In early New England, religion was a key source of obedience, with the hierarchical control from Puritan church authorities widely accepted as part of their patriarchal family model. This likely contributed to why major rebellions were avoided (Murrin et al., 59-61). Moreover, families emigrating to America during this time sought religious freedom while depending on fishing and small-scale farming, leaving little cause for discontentment or revolt, such as experienced during Bacon’s Rebellion elsewhere in America.
In a nutshell, religion and strong family foundations in the 17th century had a tremendous impact on colonial life in New England. At the same time, in the Chesapeake Colonies, families were not as well established, nor was there an organized religious presence, making it difficult for witchcraft scares to take hold. As such, no uprising mirroring Bacon’s Rebellion in New England occurred due to this lack of instability within those particular societies. By comparison, the familial stability found in traditional New England society kept potential rebellions from occurring during that same era.
In general, religion held strong sway throughout both regions but even more so in New England, which helped foster increased obedience from its citizens, leading to fewer instances of civil unrest or rebellion. As a society, the Chesapeake Colonies had a different social landscape than their New England counterparts, with weaker family ties and less developed town structures. This lack of cohesion enabled more economic growth among the lower classes, which in turn contributed to an overall positive sentiment towards local governance, with Bacon’s Rebellion being one notable exception. Remarkably, this uprising, fueled by the plea to expel Native Americans from Virginia territory, then turned against Colonial Governor William Berkeley after he refused to do that. And although the rebellion failed after over a year of resistance, it marked a turning point in colonial history, as it was the first instance of frontiersmen challenging British rule. The conflict proved unsuccessful in its primary objective but ultimately led to Governor Berkeley being removed from his post and recalled to England, demonstrating that even though they were overseas, colonists had begun to challenge imperial authority (Henretta et al., 113). This, to a great extent, became possible due to the unique combination of weak familial stability and low religious motivations of the Chesapeake Colonies population.
Bibliography
Murrin, John M., Johnson, James M., Gerstle, and Gary. Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People, Compact. Boston: Thompson Wadsworth, 2008.
Henretta, James A., Rebecca Edwards, and Robert O. Self. America’s History, 7th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011.
