Free Essay On Mandates In Education For Students With Learning Disability

The regularly mandated practices and programs under No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the individualization required by Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (ADEA) are both clear in terms of policies and regulations implementations. Practices and programs of NCLB and IDEA have undergone critical perspectives on the issue regarding students with disabilities, and the use of evidence-based research.
There are great changes in the educational landscape for students with disabilities. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is actively supporting for improved student outcomes and educators across the United States of America examine their practices to gather special methods to close the achievement gaps between groups of students. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (ADEA), is enthusiastic enough in providing for increased access to education for students with disabilities.
Both acts are focused on students with disabilities with full attention, as every school and state in United States labors to improve their academic outcomes. The policymakers are studying both the ongoing implementation of NCLB and the reauthorization of IDEA to determine the most effective means for serving students with disabilities.
There are different feedbacks regarding the outcomes of NCLB and IDEA in the field of education at present. Some feedbacks are positive on its practices and programs and few are against it. Some educators find it confusing when they will only focused on its disadvantages but seeing the positive side or its advantages on both ACTs, it is believed that it provide a better outcome for the benefit of every student with disability in particular. Since both ACTs in every district mandated new practices, standardized, and packaged curricula called research-based approaches, educators followed with those mandates with commitment.
Accordingly, many special educators do not agree that the research is not good when it comes to teaching those with disabilities, as there is little evidence that they were included with the data used to promote and sell these canned programs. The special educators have expressed difficulty with individualizing these materials and they lament the fact that they are unable to use the materials that they found to be tried and true in the past. Some programs actually have rewritten IEP objectives that must be included for accountability purposes. Many special education teachers feel that their students are being pushed aside because typically their tests results hold back the rest of the district.
Concerning some disagreements from special educators, I would suggest that they should not be focusing on a single view such as the teaching difficulties on their part as educators. Instead, they should focus generally and they should follow the newly improved strategies provided on both ACTs on the new imposed requirements for standards, assessments, accountability, and parental involvement. In fact, NCLB requires every school to test all students and that includes students with individualized Education Programs (IEPs). In accordance to the requirements of the law, every state assessment system is designed to be valid and more accessible for the utilization by the widest possible range of students in the vicinity. In addition, IDEA requires every parent to participate in the team to discuss the learning needs of their child sincerely and to determine if the school should conduct comprehensive evaluations if the child is suspected with learning disability (LD).
However, not every child with LD qualifies for special education services. In this case, in order to be eligible for these services, the students must both have LD and as a result, need special education for them to make progress in their respective school and for them to receive benefit from the general educational program. Though the identification process is complex, it differs by state and explanations of the said processes are more detailed in NCLB and IDEA Parent Guide.
Every support from NCLB, IDEA, educators, and parents would bring progress and prosperity in education. Together we must stand with one purpose that is quality education for every child.