Rise of Nationalism in China and Korea
Introduction
Nationalism is the notion of considering your culture, value, traditions, language and important aspect of life superior to other countries. There are primarily two political perspective of socialism. The first one is primordial’s view, which identifies the nationalism as a reflection of perceived and ancient tendency of human being that encourages them to bifurcate it into distinct group or system. The second view is the modernist perspective that identifies that for existing into modern society, there are some structural conditions.
Although Koreans and Chinese seem to depict two distinct nationalities but both of them have myriad sub-classes of nationalism. The nationalism in North Korea is based on the notion that is presented in the form of Juche Idea. On the contrary, in South Korea, it is depicted by the concept of “New Nationalism”. As China has the world’s biggest population base, there are also various different views.
Analysis
American Progressiveness, Chinese Thinking, Russian Ethnological Thought, and Marxism have contributed towards the rise of Chinese nationalism. Myriad conflicting and different manifestation also depict it including the Ultra-imperialism. The Communist Party of China, Three Principles of the People, Japanese Collaboration under Wang Jingwei, Fascist Blue shirts, and Tiananmen Protest of 1989 are some of the historical moments when this was manifested.
A centralized Chinese State has been normally a dire desire of all the Chinese nationalists, but most the questions faced are subject to bitter and intense debate. There are numerous questions on which there has been a historical disagreement of Chinese Nationals like: what policies will make a stronger China, What relationship should china must have with foreigner powers, what is the structure of its goal and the state, and what should be the relationship amongst Majority, Minority Groups, Han Chinese and Overseas Chinese.
How the nationalism in China has been evolved is widely covered with the commentator Lucian Pye. According to him, it is due to a lack of content in the identity of China. On the contrary, this ability has been praised by many analysts who say that the ability of China to transform its identity in many facets is a positive thing it possesses. During intense cases of external events and internal crisis, it can to adapt to a given situation. Although, there are differences amongst various nationalist group but there are few similarities that allow them to associate with each other. For example, both follow the concept of Ultra-imperialism and they all regard Sun Yat-Sen and believe that they are the heirs (ideological) of The Principles of the people. Although, these groups have differences about the question that what democracy means, but ideologically both agree that science and democracy are positive forces.
Around 5000 years ago, there have been numerous versions of the Chinese State. The world was divided amongst three distinct sides; one was the barbarian world, and another one was a civilized world. There was a marginalized concept of Chinese state and people did not believe that their interests would be served by the state of China. The modern concept of “nation state” is different from the empire that is traditional, the current state of china shares its similarity with Qing, and Ming Empires as it has a central point of authority. Historically, there are few examples that the state of China fought wars with foreign forces (Manchus, Mongols and Japanese), as most of its conflicts and wars were internal civil wars that inclined dynastic changes. Attempts have been made historically to sinicize barbarians and foreigners (like Koreans and Vietnamese), who wanted to have a different cultural identity. This part of Chinese cultural trait was not favorable for realizing the concept of a national state of Chinese but this concept gradually change with its relationship with the Western world in the 19th Century.
Throughout the Chinese history, there has been a conflict to define a relationship of Chinese identity and the ethnicity. With the help of Ming Chinese rebels in the 17th Century, there was an invasion by Manchus into the heart of China and they then formed the Qing dynasty. Over a period of time Qing dynasty incorporated groups such as Mongols, Uyghur and Mongols into their controlled territories. Manchus was faced with the issue of maintaining a high level loyal within the people they ruled and at the same time, they wanted to make their identity distinct. Considering this, they adopted a strategy by depicting themselves as Confucian sages who were enlightened, with a basic goal to advance and preserve the Chinese civilization. Over the period of many years, the Manchus finally became a very important part of their nation and they started to recognize themselves as Chinese.
In 1945, the Allied Powers divided Korea at a thirty-eight parallel between south and north as the part of imperial Japan disarmament and until date, this division is persisted. By rival regimes, the split was continued that opposed global politics and ideologies, which further, deepened by differing national identity senses, which was derived from the unique policies, histories, gender roles, and class system and by Korean experiences attained on different border sides. In the late twenty century, the Korean nationalism has been permeated by the split between South and North. Distinctive form of nationalism has been supported by each regime, which is different from the opposite side that, however, seeks to include the completely Korean peninsula in its range.
The imminent issue in relation to Korean nationalism is the reunification of two Koreas. In the unification process, the ethnic nationalism that is prevailed in the Korean society plays an imminent role. According to GiWook Shin, the drive for unification will not only legitimize ethnic consciousness, but also in the early stage of unification process, it can be a common ground, which is required to facilitate integration between two systems. Sunshine policy had been adopted towards the north, and this policy was adopted with the hope of reunion of two countries. In August 2000, the process towards this hope was commenced by the historic June 15 North–South Joint Declaration. In that process, an agreement was discussed between countries to work towards peaceful reunification in the future. In this process, number of hurdles was faced due to the large economic and political differences between state actors like Russia, US and China and between two countries. The short-term hurdle like majority of refugees from the North migrating towards South and in that situation, the need arises to overcome the political and economic instabilities.
Conclusion
American Progressiveness, Chinese Thinking, Russian Ethnological Thought, and Marxism have contributed towards the rise of Chinese nationalism. Evolution of Chinese nationalism is due to a lack of content in the identity of China. On the contrary, this ability has been praised by many analysts who say that the ability of China to transform its identity in many facets is a positive thing it possesses. The nationalism in North Korea is based on the notion that is presented in the form of Juche Idea. On the contrary, in South Korea, it is depicted by the concept of “New Nationalism”. With the rising concept of globalization in the world, the radical essence of nationalism is diluting in the China and Korea with the exception of North Korea, which is still isolated from the entire world.
End Notes
Akaha, Tsuneo. Politics and economics in northeast Asia: nationalism and regionalism in contention. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.
Beal, Tim. Crisis in Korea America, China and the risk of war. London: Pluto Press, 2011.
Fitzgerald, John. The dignity of nation’s equality, competition, and honor in East Asian nationalism. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2006.
Heo, Uk, and Terence Roehrig. Korean security in a changing East Asia. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Security International, 2007.
Saxonberg, Steven. Transitions and non-transitions from communism: regime survival in China, Cuba, North Korea and Vietnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Shin, Gi. Ethnic nationalism in Korea: genealogy, politics, and legacy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006.
Tikhonov, V. M.. Social Darwinism and nationalism in Korea the beginnings (1880s-1910s) : "survival" as an ideology of Korean modernity. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
Tu, Weiming. China in transformation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.
