How social interactions may change based on the size of a group
Simmel argues that the larger the group, the more an individual becomes more secluded, alone and segmented. Based on the size of the group, Simmel's views were somehow indefinite. On one hand, he argues the bigger the group of people, the better for an individual. Based on arguments, it is clear that the large the group of individuals, the harder it becomes to exert any control to an individual, by it is very likely the person will become distant and impersonal (Simmel 47). In the smallest social groups, social interaction is usually more intense as opposed to large groups owing to individual’s inability to share other people’s views or attention with others. As a community grows regarding size, it is suitable to experience tipping points where the manner in which it operates needs to be revolutionized.
How one’s identity is shaped by the uses of the terms “I, me, and generalized other”
According to Mead, the manners in which an individual defines himself or herself in a group of people of which they are part of shapes their identity (Mead 22). The use of “I, me and generalized other”, contributes to our identity and other people’s social identity. Based on this argument, it can be assumed as a grand account constructed of various individual stories. The reflection is that different characterization serves as the "one’s real being" that reflects pictures of the person.
Identities are shaped by how people want others to see them
Both Goffman and Cooley have argued that when an individual does not have the consent of what other people think of him or her, the individual might develop self-doubt and feelings of lack of confidence (Jacobs 24). Based on their arguments, is apparent that a person’s identities are identified by how they display themselves in social situations. The paradigm of sociological theory of socialization connotes that the person’s self-grow out of person’s social interactions with other people. The perspective of ourselves comes from the consideration of individual qualities and impressions of how others see us. In fact, how we see ourselves does is not defined by from who we truly are, but instead from how we others see us. The idea is that individuals in our close surroundings serve as the "mirrors" that reflect pictures of each and every individual (Hepworth 80). I am in agreement with both Goffman and Cooley the identities are twisted by how they would like others to perceive them.
Lessons learned from Susan Cain’s TED talk: humans interact differently
Susan Cain investigates how the contemporary society advanced to celebrate the qualities connected with extraversion (Smith par. 1). But then, as opposed to being a social impairment, inner-directedness is not merely massively broad additionally socially beneficial and fundamental. She gives the case of Apple, which we've come to connect with the Steve jobs. Based on her TED talk, it is apparent that the creative value of working alone in requisite in building an iconic companionship. Based on her argument that humans interrelate in a different way, it is indispensable for the student in learning institutions and workers to maintain stimulation. The belief system of groupthink which holds the idea of creativity and any productivity as humans interact in a different way. The concept of people interacting in various manners differentiates the zero correlation that exists between having the best idea and being the best speaker.
References
Hepworth, Mike. "Deviance and Control in Everyday Life: The Contribution of Erving Goffman." The View from Goffman (2000): 80-99. Web.
Jacobs, Glenn. "Charles Horton Cooley, Pragmatist or Belletrist? The Complexity of Influence and the Decentering of Intellectual Traditions." Symbolic Interaction 35.1 (2012): 24-48. Web.
Mead, George Herbert. "Science in Social Practice." Social Thought and Research (2000): n. pag. Web.
Simmel, Georg. Theory in Social and Cultural Anthropology: An Encyclopedia (n.d.): n. pag. Web.
Smith, Jason E. "The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Cain , Susan." Journal of Analytical Psychology J Anal Psychol 58.1 (2013): 144-46. Web. http://www.ted.com/talks/susan_cain_the_power_of_introverts.html
