Following the guidelines of the course Id guidelines
Definition of Job Ranking
Job evaluation is one of the most essential human resources practices in a modern business organization that settles on the significance of a particular job or task relevant to the organizational productivity and overall performance (Susel, Lasley, Montezemolo & Piper, 2015). There are different methods associated with job evaluation process. In this very research paper, a discussion has been made on ranking process, one of the simplest and fundamental methods for assessing job evaluation. Job ranking is a method that has put together organizational tasks and assignments according to the merit or essentiality to the firm. In order to complete the job ranking methods, a potential list of the tasks has been developed to take jobs as per their importance. According to the value of a given task, priority list has been made to set the right order to be followed. Based on some crucial judgments such as the effort to be put, skills and knowledge, responsibility and accountability towards a job and working environment, the priority, and worth of a job have been ranked.
Steps in Ranking in Job Evaluation
For small and medium size organizations, Job ranking can be termed as an active process in job evaluation. There are some steps to be followed in order to complete ranking method in job evaluation process. First, in the case of ordering the job according to the priority list, a list of the job positions can be determined to show the responsibility of the post. Next, a short description of job can be defined to access the primary liability of the position. By considering the importance of the tasks to the organization, ranking of position can be done. In the case of paired comparison tactics, a comparison has been made on two posts important for the organizational perspective (Li & Dai, 2010). Through critical evaluation of the position, effective job ranking system can be done to set the higher and lower ranking.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Ranking
The ranking method is the easiest and most used job evaluation process. It is helpful in deciding the importance of the job. On the basis of job ranking the compensation packages are planned to satisfy the individuals working at a particular position in the organization. There are several advantages and disadvantages of the ranking method of job evaluation. The advantages and disadvantages are discussed herein below.
The advantages of ranking job evaluation method are discussed in the points given below:
Simple: The ranking process is easier to use because the ranks are given by importance of the job for the organization (Susel, Lasley, Montezemolo & Piper, 2015)
An effective way of job evaluation: It is the most efficient way to job evaluation in case of less number of employment in an organization.
Measure the importance of the job: It helps the management of the organization to evaluate the importance of the job to give proper ranks to the jobs. Hence, it can be seen that the process helps in judging the importance of the job and helps the management to monitor effectively the performance of the employees working at a particular position.
The disadvantages of ranking job evaluation method are discussed in the points given below:
Difficult in cases of a higher number of jobs: It becomes difficult for the management to rank a job in case of a huge number of jobs present in an organization. For example, the management of a global organization cannot use the ranking technique to evaluate the job.
Judgments are subjective: In most cases, it can be seen that the decision made by the ranking method are subjective and limited in nature. It becomes difficult for the management to use the technique in cases of a large number of jobs.
Repetition of the ranking process: In the case of addition of a new job, the ranking method needs to be repeated.
References
Li, C., & Dai, F. (2010). An Model Based on Group Decision-Making Method and Job Value Evaluation. AMM, 20-23, 432-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.20-23.432
Susel, I., Lasley, T., Montezemolo, M., & Piper, J. (2015). Augmenting the Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks. Risk Analysis, 36(1), 49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12456
